Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis


ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2023.43-02
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Lista wydań / 2/2023 (43)
National Security-Related Expulsion Cases during the Pandemic in Hungary: Secret Revealed?

Autorzy: Erzsébet Csatlós ORCID
University of Szeged
Słowa kluczowe: national security-public safety-public order expulsion the reasoning of decisions classified information
Data publikacji całości:2023
Liczba stron:16 (27-42)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Liczba pobrań ?: 108

Abstrakt

The research investigates the reasons behind the surge in the number of expulsion cases awaiting resolution by the Constitutional Court of Hungary during the initial year of the pandemic by conducting an analysis. Identity between the cases examined can be discovered along issues related to factual and legal merits, which in several cases is the cause of the problem and the effect of which draws attention to the right to an effective remedy. The study focuses on the factual and legal issues of decisions on expulsion and entry and residence bans from the point of view of legally established third-country nationals residing in Hungary. The study explores Constitutional Court and high court decisions of the period compared to the relevant case law of the Supreme Court in a comprehensible manner and digs up the roots of the identified common problems. Exploring the legal basis in the light of basic international and EU law obligations, both access to classified documents and a system of appeal against decisions constitute a set of complex, completely independent and unrelated procedures, that ultimately means that the facts on which the expulsion is based, which are also particularly difficult to ascertain, cannot be effectively disputed.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Ambrus I., A koronavírus-járvány és a büntetőjog. “MTA Law Working Papers” 2020, no. 5, https://jog.tk.hu/mtalwp/a-koronavirus-jarvany-es-a-buntetojog (accessed: 27.11.2022).
2.Boeles P., Brouwer E., Groenendijk K., Hilbrink E., Hutten W., Public Policy Restrictions in EU Free Movement and Migration Law: General Principles and Guidelines, Amsterdam 2021.
3.Chetail V., COVID-19 and human rights of migrants: More protection for the benefit of all. International Organization for Migration (IOM). Geneva, 2020. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/covid19-human-rights.pdf (accessed: 27.11.2022).
4.Csatlós E., Remarks on the Reasoning: The Morals of a Hungarian Expulsion Decision in Times of Pandemic, “Central European Public Administration Review” 2021, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 185–186, DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2021.1.08 (accessed: 27.11.2022).
5.Gutman K., The Essence of the Fundamental Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Best Is Yet to Come?, “German Law Journal” 2019, no. 20, pp. 884–903, DOI: 10.1017/glj.2019.67 (accessed: 27.11.2022).
6.Inotai E., From Political Scapegoating to The Coronavirus Law: The Political Exploitation In Hungary, “Journal for Intelligence, Propaganda and Security Studies” 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59–71.
7.Juhász Zs., Virányi G., Hegedűs T., Visztra T., A Nemzetbiztonsági Szakszolgálat hatósági feladatai, “Nemzetbiztonsági Szemle” 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 126–147, DOI: 10.32561/nsz.2020.1.8 (accessed: 27.11.2022).
8.Kerekes Zs., State of play - az információszabadság Magyarországon 2015 őszén, “Infokommunikációés jog” 2015, vol. 12, no. 64, pp. 137–142.
9.Loxa A., Stoyanova V., Migration as a Constitutional Crisis for the European Union, in: V. Stoyanova, S. Smet: (eds.) Migrants’ Rights, Populism and Legal Resilience in Europe, Cambridge 2022, pp. 139–164, DOI: 10.1017/9781009040396 (accessed: 27.11.2022).
10.Rák-Fekete E., A tisztességes hatósági ügyintézéshez való jog érvényesülése a gyakorlatban, “Közjogi Szemle” 2020, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 93–99.
11.Schabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights. A Commentary, Oxford 2017.
12.Stehlík V., Discretion of Member States vis-à-vis Public Security: Unveiling the Labyrinth of EU Migration Rules, “International and Comparative Law Review” 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 127–142, DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2018-0019 (accessed: 27.11.2022).
13.Szép Á., A nemzetközi védelemben részesített személyek integrációjának szabályozása Magyarországon – nemzetbiztonsági szempontból, “Justum aequum salutare” 2018, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 107–131.
14.Vadász P., Ződi Zs., A nemzetbiztonsági szolgálatok és a rendvédelmi szervek információkereséshez kapcsolódó számonkérhetősége, “Jogtudományi Közlöny” 2020 no. 11, pp. 518–527.