Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.29-12

Lista wydań / 1/2020 (29)
Corporate social responsibility instruments and their impact on labour rights

Autorzy: Aneta Tyc
Słowa kluczowe: labour rights corporate social responsibility private standard-setting
Rok wydania:2020
Liczba stron:15 (177-191)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Liczba pobrań ?: 91


The aim of this article was to assess to what extent self-regulation within the CSR framework contributes to improving workers’ rights worldwide. Transnational company agreements, corporate codes of conduct, NGOs’ social accountability standards, ISO standards, the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and the Global Reporting Initiative were critically analysed us- ing logical-linguistic, historical and comparative legal methods. The research showed some evidence of a limited impact of CSR instruments on labour rights and proved that CSR tools can be perceived only as additional value to law.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Arthurs, H.W., Private ordering and workers’ rights in theglobal economy: corporate codes of conduct as a regime of labour market regulation, in: Conaghan, J. et al. (eds.), La¬bour law in an era of globalization: transformative practices and possibilities, Oxford 2004.
2.Barreau, J. and Arnal, J., Effects of financialization on restructuring and sustainable de- velopment policy: the ACCOR Group Case, in: Sun, W. et al., (eds.), Finance and sus- tainability: towards a new paradigm? A post-crisis agenda, Bingley 2011.
3.Barrier, D., National policy regimes: implications for the activism-policy nexus, in: Ut- ting, P. et al., (eds.), Global justice activism and policy reform in Europe: understand- ing when change happens, New York-London 2012.
4.Bronstein, A., International and comparative labour law. Current challenges, Geneva 2009.
5.Cooper, S., Global supply chain governance: ILO, ISO & Worker Safety, “Professional Safety” 2018, October, pp. 70-74.
6.Cotton, E., Employment relations, international framework agreements and global un- ions, in: Roper, I. et al., (eds.), Critical issues in human resource management: contem- porary perspectives, London 2020.
7.Daubler, W., Corporate social responsibility: a way to make deregulation more acceptable?, in: Blanpain, R. and Hendrickx, F., (eds.), Bulletin for comparative labour relations. Labour law between change and tradition. Liber Amicorum Antoine Jacobs, Alphen aan den Rijn 2011.
8.D’heur, M., Shared.Value. Chain: profitable growth through sustainable value creation, in: D’heur, M. (ed.), Sustainable value chain management: delivering sustainability through the core business, Cham 2015.
9.Egels-Zanden, N. and Merk J., Private regulation and trade union rights: why codes of conduct have limited impact on trade union rights, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2014, No. 123, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1840-x.
10.Fiksel, J., Design for environment: a guide to sustainable product development, New York 2009.
11.Harrington, A.R., Corporate social responsibility, globalization, the multinational corpo¬ration, and labor: an unlikely alliance, “Albany Law Review” 2011/2012, No. 75.
12.Hepple, B., Labour laws and global trade, Oxford 2005.
13.Herman, A., Reassessing the role of supplier codes of conduct: closing the gap between aspi- rations and reality, “Virginia Journal of International Law” 2012, No. 52.
14.Jenkins, R. et al., Introduction, in: Jenkins, R. et al., (eds.), Corporate responsibility and labour rights: codes of conduct in the global economy, London-Sterling, Vancouver 2002.
15.Kaufmann, C., Globalisation and labour rights. The conflict between core labour rights and international economic law, Oxford-Portland, Oregon 2007.
16.Lund-Thomsen, P. and Lindgreen, A., Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where are we now and where are we going?, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2014, No. 123. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1796-x.
17.Lyutov, N., Traditional international labour law and the new “global” kind: is there a way to make them work together?, “Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu” 2017, No. 67.
18.Marassi, S., Globalization and transnational collective labour relations. International and European framework agreements at company level, in: Blanpain R. (ed.), Bulletin for comparative labour relations, Alphen aan den Rijn 2015.
19.Ojeda-Aviles, A., Transnational labour law, Alphen aan den Rijn 2015.
20.Schomann, I., Transnational company agreements: towards an internationalisation of in- dustrial relations, in: Schomann, I. et al. (eds.), Transnational collective bargaining at company level. A new component of European industrial relations?, Brussels 2012, ompany-level.-A-new-component-of-European-industrial-relations.
21.Segerlund, L., Making corporate social responsibility a global concern. Norm construction in aglobalizing world, Farnham 2010.
22.Sikdar, S.K. et al., Measuring progress towards sustainability: a treatise for engineers, Cham 2017.
23.Stohl, C. et al., A new generation of corporate codes of ethics, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2009, No. 90, DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0064-6.
24.Toffel, M.W. et al., Codes in context: how states, markets, and civil society shape adheren- ce to global labor standards, “Regulation & Governance” 2015, No. 9. DOI: 10.1111/ rego.12076.