Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.29-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS

Lista wydań / 1/2020 (29)
Constructivism as a chance to break deadlock in interdisciplinary research combining international law and international relations

Autorzy: Tadeusz Kołodziej
Słowa kluczowe: constructivism interdisciplinary research international humanitarian law international relations modern weapons
Rok wydania:2020
Liczba stron:11 (61-71)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Liczba pobrań ?: 270

Abstrakt

The purpose of this work is to prove that the theory of constructivism can be an escape from the trap of the constant struggle for influence, which now includes interdisciplinary research combining international law and international relations. For this purpose, the work is divided into three sections. In the first one, the author briefly presents the genesis of in- terdisciplinary research on international law and international relations. In the second part, the sceptical approach of international law researchers towards combined interdisciplinary research is presented. Also in this section, the theory of constructivism is characterised as a potential area for mutual cooperation between international law and international rela¬tions. In the final part, based on the relationship between international humanitarian law and the features of modern weapons, the author tries to prove that the theory of constructiv- ism is perfectly suited to the analysis of contemporary relations between international law and the policies of nations on the international stage.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.international law aspractice, in: d’Aspremont, J. et al. (eds.), International law as a profession, Cambridge 2017.
2.Armstrong, D. et al., International law and international relations, Cambridge 2007.
3.Byers, M., Taking the law out of international law: a critique of the iterative perspective, “Harvard International Law Journal” 1997, No. 38(1).
4.Brunnee, J. and Toope S., Legitimacy and legality in international law: an international account, Cambridge 2011.
5.Checkel, J.T., Constructivist approaches to European integration, Oslo 2005.
6.Checkel, J.T., The constructivist turn in international relations theory, Cambridge 1998.
7.Curanović, A., Konstruktywizm, in: Zięba, R. et al. (eds.), Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2015.
8.Czaputowicz, J., Teorie Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2008.
9.Dunoff, J.L. and Pollack, M.A., International law and international relations: introducing an interdisciplinary dialogue, New York 2012.
10.Hug, T., Constructivism and media socialization concepts and perspectives in German- -speaking countries, “Constructivist Foundations” 2009, No. 2(4).
11.Klabbers, J., International law, Cambridge 2017.
12.Klabbers, J., Review of The status of law in world society: meditations on the role and rule of law by Friedrich Kratochwil, “European Journal of International Law” 2015, No. 25(4).
13.Klabbers, J., The bridge crack’d: a critical look at interdisciplinary relations, “Internatio- nal Relations” 2009, No. 23(1).
14.Klabbers, J., The relative autonomy of International law or the forgotten politics of interdi- sciplinarity, “Journal of International Law & International Relations” 2004, No. 1(35).
15.Kolb, R., Advanced introduction to international humanitarian law, Cheltenham 2014.
16.Koskenniemi, M., The politics of international law, “European Journal of International Law” 1990, No. 20(1).
17.Koskenniemi, M., The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law 1870-1960, Cambridge 2009.
18.Kratochwil, F., Rules, norms and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reaso- ning in international relations and domestic affairs, Cambridge 2011.
19.Onuf, N., World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations, London 2012.
20.Slaughter, A.M., International law and international relations theory: a dual agenda, “American Journal of International Law” 1993, No. 87(2).
21.Schmitt, M., Precision attack and international humanitarian law, “International Review of the Red Cross” 2005, No. 87.
22.Widłak, T., Prawo a konstruktywizm w teorii stosunków międzynarodowych - możliwo¬ści interdyscyplinarnego zbliżenia, in: Bekrycht, T. et al. (eds.), Integracja zewnętrzna i wewnętrzna nauk prawnych, Łódź 2014.