Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2023.61-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 61 (2023)
Amerykańska metafizyka rasy

Autorzy: Mieczysław Jagłowski ORCID
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, Instytut Filozofii
Słowa kluczowe: rasa rasizm współczesna filozofia amerykańska realizm antyrealizm eliminatywizm konserwatyzm krytyka metafizyki rasy
Data publikacji całości:2023
Liczba stron:22 (67-88)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

W latach 90. XX wieku w Stanach Zjednoczonych rozpoczęła się debata na temat rasy, w którą angażują się liczni filozofowie. Na gruncie filozofii zyskała ona miano metafizyki rasy. Celem artykułu jest naszkicowanie stanowisk w obszarze metafizyki rasy jako wyodrębnionego, głównie amerykańskiego nurtu myśli filozoficznej - realizmu (naturalistycznego i konstruktywistycznego) oraz antyrealizmu – oraz wskazanie najważniejszych argumentów, jakimi ich najwybitniejsi proponenci uzasadniają swoje metafizyczne stanowiska, jak również kontrargumentów ich oponentów. Artykuł omawia także bardzo ważny z moralnego i społecznego punktu widzenia normatywny aspekt tego sporu, wyszczególniając na tej płaszczyźnie dwa główne stanowiska: eliminatywizm i konserwatyzm w kwestii obecności terminów i pojęć rasowych w dyskursach publicznych. W końcowych partiach artykułu rozważono relacje zachodzące między stanowiskami metafizycznymi i dyrektywami praktycznymi formułowanymi przez uczestników debaty oraz przedstawiono argumenty krytyczne dotyczące filozoficznej wartości i społecznej doniosłości tego nurtu myślenia.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Andreasen, R.O. (1998). A New Perspective on the Race Debate. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49 (2), 199-225.
2.Andreasen, R.O. (2007). Biological Conceptions of Race. W: M. Matthen, Ch. Stephens (red.), Philosophy of Biology (s. 455-481). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3.Andreasen, R.O. (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct?. Philosophy of Science, 67, Supplement, S653-S666.
4.Andreasen, R.O. (2004). The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense. Biology and Philosophy, 19 (3), 425-442. DOI: 10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036110.07449.8d.
5.Appiah, K.A. (1992). My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. Oxford and New York: University Press.
6.Appiah, K.A. (1990). Race. W: T. McLaughlin, F. Lentricchia (red.), Critical Terms for Literary Studies (s. 274–287). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
7.Appiah, K.A. (1996). Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections. W: K.A. Appiah, A. Gutmann (red.), Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race (s. 51-136). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.Appiah, K.A. (2005). The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.Balibar, E. (2008). Racism Revisited: Sources, Relevance, and Aporias of a Modern Concept. PMLA, 123 (5), 1630-1639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.5.1630.
10.Carter, B. (2000). Realism and racism: concepts of race in sociological research. New York: Routledge.
11.Carter, J.A. (2014). Does „Race” Have a Future or Should the Future Have „Races”? Reconstruction or Eliminativism in a Pragmatist Philosophy of Race. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 50 (1), 29-47. DOI: 10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.1.29.
12.Corlett, A.J. (2003). Race, Racism, and Reparations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
13.Gannett, L. (2004). The Biological Reification of Race. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55 (2), 323-345. DOI: 10.1093/bjps/55.2.323.
14.Glasgow, J. (2009). A Theory of Race. New York: Routledge.
15.Glasgow, J. (2003). On the New Biology of Race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100 (9), 456-474. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2003100930.
16.Gracia, J.J.E., Smith, S.L (2018). Analytic Metaphysics. Race and Racial Identity. W: P.C. Taylor, L. Martín Alcoff, and L. Anderson (red.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Race (s. 203-215). New York and London: Routledge.
17.Griffith, A.M. (2019). Metaphysics and Social Justice. Philosophy Compass, 14 (6), 1-13. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12594.
18.Hardimon, M.O. (2013). Race Concepts in Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38 (1), 6-31. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhs059.
19.Hardimon, M.O. (2017). Rethinking Race: The Case for Deflationary Realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
20.Hardimon, M.O. (2003). The Ordinary Concept of Race. The Journal of Philosophy, 100 (9), 437-455. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2003100932.
21.Harrison, F.V. (1998). Introduction: Expanding the Discourse on „Race”. American Anthropologist, 100 (3), 609-631. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.609.
22.Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.Haslanger, S. (2005). What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds. Hypatia, 20 (4), 10-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00533.x.
24.Hochman, A. (2013). Against the New Racial Naturalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 110 (6), 331-351. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2013110625.
25.Hochman, A. (2021). Against the Reification of Race in Bioethics: Anti-Racism without Racial Realism. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21 (2), 88-90. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1861371.
26.Hochman, A. (2017). In Defense of the Metaphysics of Race. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 174 (11), 2709-2729. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0806-0.
27.Hochman, A. (2021a). Janus-faced Race: Is Race Biological, Social, or Mythical?. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 175 (2), 453-464. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24169.
28.Hochman, A. (2016). Race: Deflate or Pop?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57, 60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.03.003.
29.Hochman, A. (2019). Racialization: A Defense of the Concept. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42 (8), 1245-1262. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1527937.
30.Hochman, A. (2017). Replacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized Groups. Ergo, 4 (3), 61-92. DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.003.
31.Ikuenobe, P. (2018). The Practical and Experiential Reality of Racism: Carter’s and Corlett’s Realism About Race and Racism. Journal of African American Studies, 22 (4), 373-392. DOI: 10.1007/s12111-018-9417-5.
32.Jenkins, K. (2019). Two Routes to Radical Racial Pluralism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 93 (1), 49-68. DOI: 10.1093/arisup/akz008.
33.Lee, C.S.J. (1994). Navigating the Topology of Race. Stanford Law Review, 46 (3), 747-780. DOI: 10.2307/1229107.
34.Kim, C.J. (2004). Unyielding Positions: a Critique of the „Race” Debate. Ethnicities, 4 (3), 337-355. DOI: 10.1177/1468796804045238.
35.Kitcher, Ph. (2007). Does „Race” Have a Future?. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (4), 293-317.
36.Kitcher, Ph. (2012). Preludes to pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.Kitcher, Ph. (1999). Race, Ethnicity, Biology, Culture. W: L. Harris (red.), Racism (s. 87–117). Amherst: Prometheus Books.
38.Koterski, A. (2015). Nauka, rasizm i postrasizm. Filozofia Nauki, 2 (90), 123-139.
39.Lappin, R. (2016). Should CERD Repudiate the Notion of Race?. Peace Review, 28 (4), 393-398. DOI: 10.1080/10402659.2016.1237077.
40.Lemeire, O. (2016). Beyond the Realism Debate: The Metaphysics of „Racial” Distinctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 59, 47-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.08.001.
41.Lewontin, R.Ch. (1972). The apportionment of human diversity. W: Th. Dobzhansky, M.K. Hecht, W.C. Steere (red.), Evolutionary Biology, vol. 6 (s. 381–398). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
42.Livingstone, F.B., Dobzhansky, Th. (1962). On the Non-Existence of Human Races. Current Anthropology, 3 (3), 279-281.
43.Ludwig, D. (2015). Against the New Metaphysics of Race. Philosophy of Science, 82 (2), 244-265. DOI: 10.1086/680487.
44.Ludwig, D. (2014). Hysteria, Race, and Phlogiston. A Model of Ontological Elimination in the Human Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45, 68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.007.
45.Ludwig, D. (2020). Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50 (4), 492-504. DOI: 10.1017/can.2019.52.
46.Mallon, R. (2018). Constructing Race: Racialization, Causal Effects, or Both?. Philosophical Studies, 175 (5), 1039-1056. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1069-8.
47.Mallon, R. (2006). „Race”: Normative, Not Metaphysical or Semantic. Ethics, 116 (3), 525-551. DOI: 10.1086/500495.
48.Martin Alcoff, L. (1997). Philosophy and Racial Identity. Philosophy Today, 41 (1), 67-76. DOI: 10.5840/philtoday199741119.
49.Mavundla, S.M. (2019), Interactive Constructionism: A More Preferable Anti-Realist Approach to the Metaphysics of Race. South African Journal of Philosophy, 38 (2), 219-225. DOI: 10.1080/02580136.2019.1634503.
50.Mills, Ch.W. (1998). Blackness Visible: Essays on Philosophy and Race. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
51.Mosley, A. (1997). Are Racial Categories Racist?. Research in African Literatures, 28 (4), 101-111.
52.Omi, M., Winant, H. (1994). Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. London and New York: Routledge.
53.Oyedola, D.A. (2015). Appiah on Race and Identity in the Illusions of Race: A Rejoinder. Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions, 4 (2): 20-45. DOI: 10.4314/ft.v4i2.2.
54.Pierce, A.J. (2012). Reconstructing Race: A Discourse‐Theoretical Approach to a Normative Politics of Identity. Philosophical Forum, 43 (1), 1-22. DOI: 10.1111/phil.2012.43.issue-1.
55.Quine, W.V. (1995). Rzeczy i ich miejsce w teoriach. W: T. Szubka (red.), Metafizyka w filozofii analitycznej (s. 31-52). Lublin: Wydawnictwo TN KUL.
56.Sesardic, N. (2010). Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept. Biology and Philosophy, 25 (2), 143-162. DOI: 10.1007/s10539-009-9193-7.
57.Shulman, J.L., Glasgow, J. (2010), Is Race-Thinking Biological or Social, and Does it Matter for Racism? An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Philosophy, 41 (3), 244-259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01497.x.
58.Song, M. (2018). Why we Still Need to Talk About Race. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41 (6), 1131-1145. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2018.1410200.
59.Spencer, Q. (2019). A More Radical Solution to the Race Problem. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 93 (1), 25-48. DOI: 10.1093/arisup/akz011.
60.Spencer, Q. (2014). A Radical Solution to the Race Problem. Philosophy of Science, 81 (5), 1025-1038. DOI: 10.1086/677694.
61.Spencer, Q. (2016). In Defense of the Actual Metaphysics of Race. Pobrane z: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/12527/1/PHOS%20submission%20.pdf
62.Spencer, Q. (2018). Racial Realism I: Are Biological Races Real?. Philosophy Compass, 13 (1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12468.
63.Spencer, Q. (2014a). The Unnatural Racial Naturalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 46, 38-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.02.005.
64.Spencer, Q. (2012). What „Biological Racial Realism” Should Mean. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 159 (2), 181-204. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9697-2.
65.Sundstrom, R.R., Kim, D.H. (2014). Xenophobia and Racism, Critical Philosophy of Race, 2 (1), 20-45. DOI: 10.5325/critphilrace.2.1.0020
66.Taylor, P.C. (2000). Appiah’s Uncompleted Argument: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Reality of Race. Social Theory and Practice, 26 (1), 103-128. DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract20002616.
67.Uyan, D. (2021). Re-Thinking Racialization: The Analytical Limits of Racialization. Du Bois Review, 1-15. DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X21000023.
68.Zack, N. (2018). Philosophy of Race. An Introduction. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.Zack, N. (2002). Philosophy of Science and Race. New York: Routledge.
70.Zack, N. (1993). Race and Mixed Race. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
71.Zack, N. (2003). Reparations and the Rectification of Race. The Journal of Ethics, 7 (1), 139-151. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022883014371.