Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2016.35-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 35 (2016)
Dysjunktywizm i natura percepcyjnej relacji

Autorzy: Paweł Zięba
Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Słowa kluczowe: halucynacja percepcja relacja współkonstytuowania relacja przyczynowa alternatywizm dysjunktywizm uzasadnienie epistemiczne
Rok wydania:2016
Liczba stron:25 (87-111)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

DISJUNCTIVISM AND THE NATURE OF PERCEPTUAL RELATIONSummaryThis paper surveys selected (though arguably representative) versions of metaphysicaland epistemological disjunctivism. Although they share a common logicalstructure, it is hard to find a further common denominator among them. Two mainconclusions are: (1) a specific standpoint on the nature of perceptual relation is notsuch a common denominator, which means that it is very unlikely that all of theseviews could be refuted with a single objection; (2) contrary to what its name suggests,disjunctivism can be correctly expressed without the employment of disjunction.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Brogaard, B. (2011). Disjunctivism. Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide.
2.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.Burge, T. (1991). Vision and Intentional Content. W: E. Lepore, R. van Gulick
4.(eds.), John Searle and His Critics (s. 195–213). Oxford, UK–Cambridge,
5.MA: Blackwell.
6.Burge, T. (2005). Disjunctivism and Perceptual Psychology. Philosophical Topics,
7.33 (1), 1–78.
8.Burge, T. (2011). Disjunctivism Again. Philosophical Explorations, 14 (1), 43–80.
9.Byrne, A., Logue, H. (2008). Either/Or. W: A. Haddock, F. MacPherson (eds.),
10.Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (s. 57–94). Oxford: Oxford
11.University Press.
12.Byrne, A., Logue, H. (2009). Introduction. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue (eds.), Disjunctivism:
13.contemporary readings (s. VII–XXIX). Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.Campbell, J. (2002). Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University
15.Press.
16.Chalmers, D. (2010). Świadomy umysł. W poszukiwaniu teorii fundamentalnej. Tłum.
17.M. Miłkowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
18.Conduct, M.D. (2010). Naїve realism and extreme disjunctivism. Philosophical
19.Explorations, 13 (3), 201–221.
20.Crane, T. (2006). Is there a perceptual relation? W: T. Gendler, J. Hawthorne (eds.),
21.Perceptual Experience (s. 126–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.Crane, T. (2011). The Problem of Perception. W: E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford
23.Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). Pobrane z: http://plato.
24.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/perception-problem/.
25.Dretske, F. (2000). The Mind’s Awareness of Itself. W: Perception, Knowledge and
26.Belief. Selected Essays (s. 158–177). Cambridge University Press.
27.Fish, W. (2010). Philosophy of Perception. A Contemporary Introduction. Oxford,
28.UK–Cambridge, MA: Routledge.
29.Haddock, A., MacPherson, F. (2008). Introduction. Varieties of disjunctivism.
30.W: A. Haddock, F. MacPherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action,
31.Knowledge (s. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.Hellie, B. (2014). The Multidisjunctive Conception of Hallucination. W: F. MacPherson,
33.D. Platchias (eds.), Hallucination. Philosophy and Psychology
34.(s. 149–173). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
35.Hinton, J.M. (2009a). Selections from Experiences. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue (eds.),
36.Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 13–32). Cambridge: MIT Press.
37.Hinton, J.M. (2009b). Visual Experiences. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue (eds.), Disjunctivism:
38.contemporary readings (s. 1–11). Cambridge: MIT Press.
39.Johnston, M. (2009). The obscure object of hallucination. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue
40.(eds.), Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 207–269). Cambridge: MIT
41.MacPherson, F. (2014). The Philosophy and Psychology of Hallucination: An Introduction.
42.W: F. MacPherson, D. Platchias (eds.), Hallucination. Philosophy
43.and Psychology (s. 1–38). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
44.Madison, B.J.C. (2010). Epistemic Internalism. Philosophy Compass, 5 (10),
45.840–853.
46.Martin, M.G.F. (2002). The Transparency of Experience. Mind and Language,
47.4 (4), 376–425.
48.Martin, M.G.F. (2006). On Being Alienated. W: T. Gendler, J. Hawthorne (eds.),
49.Perceptual Experience (s. 354–410). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.Martin, M.G.F. (2009a). The Limits of Self-Awareness. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue
51.(eds.), Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 271–318). Cambridge:
52.MIT Press.
53.Martin, M.G.F. (2009b). The Reality of Appearances. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue (eds.),
54.Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 91–116). Cambridge: MIT Press.
55.McDowell, J. (1998). Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. W: J. McDowell (ed.),
56.Meaning, Knowledge and Reality (s. 369–394). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
57.McDowell, J. (2008). The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for
58.a Transcendental Argument. W: A. Haddock, F. MacPherson (eds.), Disjunctivism:
59.Perception, Action, Knowledge (s. 376–389). Oxford: Oxford University
60.McDowell, J. (2010). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations,
61.13 (3), 243–255.
62.McDowell, J. (2013a). Perceptual Experience: Both Relational and Contentful.
63.European Journal of Philosophy, 21 (1), 144–157.
64.McDowell, J. (2013b). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism (II). Philosophical Explorations,
65.16 (3), 259–279.
66.Millar, A. (2007). What the Disjunctivist is Right About. Philosophy and Phenomenological
67.Research, 74 (1), 176–198.
68.Millar, A. (2010). Knowledge and Recognition. W: D. Pritchard, A. Millar,
69.A. Haddock (eds.), The Nature and Value of Knowledge. Three Investigations.
70.Phillips, I. (b.d.w.). Uncoscious Perception Reconsidered. Pobrane z: http://www.
71.ianbphillips.com/uploads/2/2/9/4/22946642/antwerp.pdf.
72.Pritchard, D. (2012). Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University
73.Pryor, J. (2001). Highlights of Recent Epistemology. British Journal for the Philosophy
74.of Science, 52, 95–124.
75.Schellenberg, S. (2014). The Relational and Representational Character of Perceptual
76.Experience. W: B. Brogaard (ed.), Does Perception have Content?
77.(s. 199–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78.Schetz, A. (2007). Alternatywizm w teorii percepcji. Diametros, 14, 85–104.
79.Schetz, A. (2014). Biologiczny eksternalizm w teoriach percepcji. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo
80.Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
81.Siegel, S. (2010). The Contents of Visual Experience. New York: Oxford University
82.Snowdon, P. (2008). Hinton and the Origins of Disjunctivism. W: A. Haddock,
83.F. MacPherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge
84.(s. 35–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85.Snowdon, P. (2009a). Perception, Vision, and Causation. W: A. Byrne, H. Logue
86.(eds.), Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 33–48). Cambridge:
87.Snowdon, P. (2009b). The Objects of Perceptual Experience. W: A. Byrne,
88.H. Logue (eds.), Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (s. 49–74). Cambridge:
89.Soteriou, M. (2000). The Particularity of Visual Perception. European Journal
90.of Philosophy, 8 (2), 173–189.
91.Soteriou, M. (2005). The Subjective View of Experience and Its Objective Commitments.
92.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 105, 177–190.
93.Soteriou, M. (2010a). Perceiving Events. Philosophical Explorations, 13 (3),
94.223–241.
95.Soteriou, M. (2010b). The Disjunctive Theory of Perception. W: E.N. Zalta (ed.),
96.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition). Pobrane
97.z: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/perception-disjunctive/.
98.Thau, M. (2004). What is Disjunctivism? Philosophical Studies, 120 (1),
99.193–253.
100.Travis, C. (2013). Frege, Father of Disjunctivism. W: Perception. Essays After Frege
101.(s. 59–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102.Tye, M. (2007). Intentionalism and the argument from no common content. Noûs,
103.41 (1), 589–613.
104.Tye, M. (2014). What is the content of a hallucinatory experience? W: B. Brogaard
105.(ed.), Does Perception have Content? (s. 291–310). New York: Oxford
106.Woleński, J. (2007). Epistemologia. Poznanie, prawda, wiedza, realizm. Warszawa:
107.Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
108.Zięba, P.J. (2014). In Search of the Holy Grail of Epistemology. Kriterion – Journal
109.of Philosophy, 28, 55–74.