Studia Maritima

ISSN: 0137-3587     eISSN: 2353-303X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sm.2017.30-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / Vol. 30 2017
„NASZA PRZYSZŁOŚĆ LEŻY NA MORZU”. WEWNĘTRZNE I ZEWNĘTRZNE UWARUNKOWANIA ROZBUDOWY FLOTY NIEMIECKIEJ W LATACH 1898–1912
(“OUR FUTURE LIES ON THE SEA” INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS OF GERMANY’S NAVAL ARMAMENTS IN THE YEARS 1898–1912)

Authors: Piotr Szlanta
Instytut Historyczny, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Keywords: William II Alfred von Tirpitz Germany Great Britain fleet naval arms race First World War
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:27 (41-67)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Since the very beginning of his accession to the throne in June, 1888, German emperor William II strived to develop Germany’s naval potential, as an integral element of so called “world policy” Weltpolitik. He regarded the transition of the German Reich into a full-scale naval great power as one of the crucial aims of his reign. In his eyes a new fleet should perform many important tasks such as improving Germany’s international position and appeal as a potential ally. This would widen its freedom of movement and help gain new colonial acquisitions. In addition, a German fleet was needed to protect her growing overseas trade and defend communication lines with German colonies. The pride of a new, powerful navy should also help to establish a real unification of German society and to fight back the socialist influence within the working-class, which challenged the existing political and social status quo. In economic terms, this largescale naval armament program should improve Germany’s economic situation, acting as an important catalyst for developing branches of modern industry and for boosting employment. To convince German public opinion of the necessity of naval armaments, the German government started a huge, unprecedented, modern PR-campaign. A key figure of the whole project was Admiral Alfred Tirpitz, nominated in 1897 to the post of State Secretary of the Naval Office. Tirpitz framed the conception of “the risk fleet”. In his opinion Germany should possess a fleet so strong that it would discourage potential aggressor. Mainly, thanks to his efforts in 1898, the German parliament voted in favor of a naval bill. In the following years, until 1912, this law was amended four times. The aspirations of this project were quashed. Instead of strengthening the German international position among the great powers, this program lead to the isolation of Germany among them. Especially, the British politicians and British public opinion were convinced that the German battle fleet stationed permanently in home waters within striking distance of their islands could have only one meaning, namely that such a fleet was built to challenge British naval supremacy and prepare the way for the eventual German invasion. Great Britain was keen to maintain her naval preponderance, which it regarded as indispensable for defending the British Islands and maintaining its vast overseas empire. In vain they tried to work out a compromise with Germans on that issue. But William II was determined to not allow any foreign intrusion in his naval-building program. The last attempt of finding a compromise was the failed mission to Germany of lord Richard Haldane at the beginning of 1912. Thus Great Britain seemed to have no choice but to try to tighten political and military relations with countries regarded, until now, as potential enemies, namely France and Russia. The cost of the program weighed down the German state budget, thus necessitating financial reform and new taxes. During the First World War, the German battleship fleet did not play a substantial role in military operations and after the war was handed over to the victorious allies.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bethman Hollweg, Theobald von. Betrachtungen zum Weltkriege, t. I. Berlin: Hobbing, 1919.
2.British Documents on the Origins of the War 1898–1914, red. George P. Gooch, Harold Temperley, t. I–XI. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1927–1938.
3.Bülow, Bernhard von. Denkwürdigkeiten, t. I–IV. Berlin: Ullstein, 1930.
4.Canis, Konrad. Der Weg in den Abgrund. Deutsche Außenpolitik 1902–1914. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2011.
5.Canis, Konrad. Von Bismarck zur Weltpolitik. Deutsche Außenpolitik 1890–1902. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997.
6.Cecil, Lamar. Wilhelm II, t. I–II. Chapel Hill–London: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.
7.Denkwürdigkeiten des Fürsten Chlodwig zu Hohenlohe-Schillingsfürst, red. Friedrich Curtis, t. I–II. Stuttgart–Leipzig: Deutsche Verl.-Anst., 1906.
8.Die Reden Kaiser Wilhelms II, red. Bogdan Krieger, t. I–IV. Leipzig: Reclam, 1913.
9.Epkenhans, Michael. „«Mund halten und Schiffe bauen?» Stapelläufe: Monarchische Repräsentation, politische Legitimation und öffentliches Fest”. W: Das politische Zeremoniell im Deutschen Kaiserreich 1871–1918, red. Andreas Biefang, Michael Epkenhans, Klaus Tenfelde, 189–203. Düsseldorf: Droste, 2008.
10.Epkenhans, Michael. „Wilhelm II and ‘his’ navy 1888–1918”. W: The Kaiser. New Research on Wilhelm II’s Role in Imperial Germany, red. Annika Mombauer, Wilhelm Deist, 12–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
11.Fröhlich, Michael. Imperialismus. Deutsche Kolonial- und Weltpolitik 1880 bis 1914. München: DTV, 1997.
12.Geppert, Dominik. Pressekriege. Öffentlichkeit und Diplomatie in den deutsch-britischen Beziehungen 1896–1912. München: Oldenburg 2007.
13.Große Politik der Europäischen Kabinette, red. Johannes Lepsius, Albrecht Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, Friedrich Thimme, t. I–XL. Berlin: Dt. Verl.-Ges. für Politik und Geschichte, 1922–1927.
14.Hildebrand, Klaus. Das vergangene Reich. Deutsche Außenpolitik von Bismarck bis Hitler 1871–1945. Stuttgart: DTV, 1995.
15.Joll, James, Gordon Martel. Przyczyny wybuchu pierwszej wojny światowej. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 2008.
16.Kennedy, Paul M. The Rise of Anglo-German Antagonism 1860–1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1980.
17.König, Wolfgang. Wilhelm II und die Moderne. Der Kaiser und die technisch-industrielle Welt. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2007.
18.Krockow, Christian Graf von. Niemcy. Ostatnie sto lat. Warszawa: Volumen, 1997.
19.Massie, Robert K. Dreadnought. Brytania, Niemcy i nadejście Wielkiej Wojny, t. I–II. Gdańsk: Finna, 2004.
20.Mommsen, Wolfgang J. Grossmachtstellung und Weltpolitik. Die Außenpolitik des Deutschen Reiches 1870 bis 1914. Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein, 1993.
21.Obst, Michael A. „Einer nur ist Herr im Reiche”. Kaiser Wilhelm II. als politische Redner. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2010.
22.Petzold, Dominik. Der Kaiser und das Kino. Herrschaftsinszenierung, Populärkultur und Filmpropaganda im Wilhelminischen Zeitalter. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2012.
23.Reden des Kaisers. Ansprachen, Predigten und Trinksprüche Wilhelms II., red. Ernst Johann. München: DTV, 1977.
24.Reinermann, Lothar. Der Kaiser in England. Wilhelm II. und sein Bild in der britischen Öffentlichkeit. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2001.
25.Röhl, John C.G. Wilhelm II. Der Aufbau der persönlichen Monarchie 1888–1900.München: Beck, 2001.
26.Röhl, John C.G. Wilhelm II. Der Weg in den Abgrund 1900–1941. München: Beck, 2008.
27.Szlanta, Piotr. „Konflikty marokańskie 1905–1910”. W: Konflikty kolonialne i postkolonialne w Afryce i Azji 1869–2006, red. Piotr Ostaszewski, 124–137. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 2006.
28.The Holstein Papers, red. Norman Rich, Max Henry Fisher, t. I–IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955–1963.
29.Tirpitz, Alfred von. Der Aufbau der deutschen Weltmacht. Stuttgart–Berlin: Cotta 1924.
30.Tirpitz, Alfred von. Wspomnienia. Warszawa: Bellona, 1997.
31.Wilderotter, Hans. „«Unser Zukunft Liegt auf dem Wasser». Das Schiff als Metapher und die Flotte als Symbol der Politik des wilhelminischen Kaiserreiches”. W: Der letzte Kaiser Wilhelm II. im Exil, red. Hans Wilderotter, Klaus-Dieter Pohl, 55–78. Berlin: Bertelsmann, 1991.