Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.52/2-08
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 52/2 2018
W poszukiwaniu typologii innowacji społecznie odpowiedzialnych: mapowanie pola badawczego
(In search of the typology of socially responsible innovations: mapping the research field)

Authors: Andrzej Lis
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Agata Sudolska
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Keywords: responsible innovation socially responsible innovation sustainable innovation
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:11 (115-125)
Klasyfikacja JEL: M14
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of the paper in to map the research field related to the typology of socially responsible innovations through identifying the types of innovations aimed at implementing organizational changes in accordance with the philosophy of corporate social responsibility. The paper enumerates the types of such innovations and analyses the interest of academia in conducting related research manifested in the number of publications. Then, applying the systematic literature review, the paper characterizes the identified types of innovations. Finally, relationships, similarities and differences between the constructs under the study are pointed out and recommendations for further studies are provided.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Black, S.E., Lynch, L.M. (2004). What’s Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation. Economic Journal, 114 (493), F97–F116.
2.Craig, J., Dibrell, C. (2006). The Natural Environment, Innovation and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study. Family Business Review, 19 (4), 275–288.
3.Czakon, W. (2011). Metoda systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57–62.
4.Flipse, S.M., Van Der Sanden, M.C.A., Radstake, M., De Winde, J.H., Osseweijer, P. (2014). The DNA of Socially Responsible Innovation: Social and Natural Scientists Need to Establish Mutual Understanding and a Common Language to Efficiently Work Together. EMBO Reports, 15 (2), 134–137.
5.Foster, C., Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualizing Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-income Consumers. European Journal of Development Research, 25 (3), 333–355.
6.Furmańska-Maruszak, A., Sudolska, A. (2016). Social Innovations in Companies and in Social Economy Enterprises. Comparative Economic Research, 19 (3), 169–191.
7.Heiscala, R. (2007). Social Innovations: Structural and Power Perspectives. W: T.J. Hamalainen, R. Heiskala (red.), Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic
8.Performance (s. 52–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9.Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots Innovations in Community Energy: The Role of Intermediaries in Niche Development. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 868–880.
10.Harris, M., Albury, D. (2009), The Innovation Imperative. London: NESTA.
11.Kazojć, K. (2014). Koncepcja społecznej odpowiedzialności i jej obszary w organizacjach. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 38 (1), 57–69.
12.Levännen, J., Hossain, M., Lyytinen, T., Hyvärinen, A., Numminen, S., Halme, M. (2016). Implications of Frugal Innovations on Sustainable Development: Evaluating Water and Energy Innovations. Sustainability, 8 (1), 1–17.
13.Mulgan, G. (2007). Social Silicon Valleys: A Manifesto for Social Innovations. London: The Young Foundation.
14.OECD (2000). LEED Forum on Social Innovations. Pobrane z: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Forum-Social-Innovations.htm (22.03.2018).
15.Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (red.) (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
16.Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. Stiloge, J. (2013). Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society. Science and Public Policy, 39 (6), 751–760.
17.Pol, E., Ville, S. (2009). Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (6), 878–885.
18.Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining Innovation – Eco-innovation Research and the Contribution from Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, 32 (2), 319–332.
19.Seyfang, G., Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (3), 381–400.
20.Seyfang, G., Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: Towards a New Research and Policy Agenda. Environmental Politics, 16 (4), 584–603.
21.Skrzypczyńska, K. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Indicator of the Company Positive Organisational Potential. W: M.J. Stankiewicz (red.), Positive Management: Managing the Key Areas of Positive Organisational Potential for Company Success (s. 261–286). Toruń: TNOiK.
22.Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy, 42 (9), 1568–1580.
23.von Schomberg, R. (2012). The Quest for the ‘Right’ Impacts of Science and Technology: An Outlook Towards a Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation. W: C. Kermisch, M.G. Pinsart (red.), Nanotechnologies: Towards a Shift in the Scale of Ethics? (s. 269–287). Bruxelles, Fernelmont: E.M.E. & Intercommunications s.p.r.l.