European Journal of Service Management

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Service Management

ISSN: 2450-8535     eISSN: 2353-2858     DOI: 10.18276/ejsm.2017.21-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / Vol. 21, 1/2017
Social media adoption in local governments. The case of Poland

Autorzy: Adam Pawlicz
University of Szczecin

Robert Kubicki
University of Szczecin
Słowa kluczowe: local government social media Poland
Rok wydania:2017
Liczba stron:8 (19-26)
Klasyfikacja JEL: M31 O35 Z13
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

The use of social media is gradually transforming all marketing activities also in the public sector. Social media in public administration constitutes also a research area for numerous scholars not only with economic background. Still a majority of contributions deal with qualitative aspects of social media adoption by either presenting good practices or comparing the selected social media of cities and countries. Hence there is a paucity of research that presents the real share of social media adoption in public administration, especially at the local level. The aim of this paper is to fill this research gap and present the data of social media adoption among lowest level of Polish local government. As a research area we choose communes (municipalities/ Polish: gmina/ NUTS 5) as the lowest administrative unit in Poland. We used a random sample of 385 Polish communes (out of 2478) and examined whether they have official social media profiles by inspecting their official web sites. The main result of this study is the estimation of a percentage of communes that have at least one social media official profile which in 2016 was 52,71%. This represents a huge expansion of social media popularity as in 2015 we estimated the same number as 26,75%. The structure of used social media sites between 2015 and 2016 did not change much as Facebook remained the most often chosen social media for local public administration.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Abdelsalam, H. M., Reddick, C. G., Gamal, S., & Al-shaar, A. (2013). Social media in Egyptian government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 406–416. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.020
2.Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2016). A Measurement Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Social Media to Public Engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1289–1307. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1100320
3.Alotaibi, R., Ramachandran, M., & Kor, A. (2016). A Conceptual Model for the Factors Affecting Social Media Adoption in Saudi Government 2.0. In ECEG2016-Proceedings of 16th European Conference on e-Government ECEG 2016 (pp. 10–18).
4.Area and Population in the territorial profile in 2016. (2016). Warszawa.
5.Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
6.Bonsón, E., Ratkai, M., & Royo, S. (2016). Facebook Use in Western European Local Governments: An Overall View. In Social Media and Local Governments (pp. 59–77).
7.Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
8.Bryer, T. A., & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social Media and Public Administration Introduction to the Symposium. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1806(March). http://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330301
9.Eng, J. (2003). Sample Size Estimation: How Many Individuals Should Be Studied? 1. Radiology.
10.Harris, J. K., Mueller, N. L., & Snider, D. (2013). Social media adoption in local health departments nationwide. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1700–1707. http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301166
11.Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M., & Becker, J. (2013). What makes local governments’ online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 387–396. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.013
12.Karakiza, M. (2015). The Impact of Social Media in the Public Sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 384–392. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1214
13.Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., … Xie, L. (2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 480–491. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002
14.Kot, S., Jakubowski, J., & Sokołowski, A. (2007). Statystyka: podręcznik dla studiów ekonomicznych.
15.Landsbergen, D. (2010). Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG (pp. 243–250).
16.Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. (2016). Social Media and the City: Analyzing Conversations in Municipal Facebook Pages. In Social Media and Local Governments (pp. 243–261).
17.Machin, D., Campbell, M., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2011). Sample size tables for clinical studies.
18.Magro, M. J. (2012). A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government. Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 148–161. http://doi.org/10.3390/admsci2020148
19.Mergel, I. (2013a). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
20.Mergel, I. (2013b). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004
21.Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. (2013). A three stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73(3).
22.Moses, L. (1978). Tables of random permutations.
23.Oliveira, G. H. M., & Welch, E. W. (2013). Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 397–405. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019
24.Pawlicz, A. (2015). Wykorzystanie mediów społecznościowych jako narzędzia marketingu turystycznego przez gminy leżące na terenach Parków Narodowych w Polsce. Ekonomia I Środowisko, 55(4), 176–187.
25.Pawlicz, A., & Kubicki, R. (2016). Wykorzystanie mediów społecznościowych w marketingu terytorialnym gmin w Polsce. In D. Sokołowski & P. Tomczykowska (Eds.), Kreatywność w turystyce. Nowe trendy w rozwoju turystyki (pp. 147–157). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
26.Sidorkiewicz, M. (2013). Use of Facebook in promotion of hotel services. In Responsible tourism 2020 (pp. 199–208).
27.Smalec, A., & Gracz, L. (2015). Wykorzystanie mediów społecznościowych przez samorządy lokalne w procesie komunikacji społecznej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wroclawiu, 414.
28.Spurrell, D. (2012). An opportunity or a threat? How local government uses social media today. The Guardian, 5–9.
29.Sułkowski, Ł., & Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D. (2014). Communication of Polish Cities in Social Media. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 13(4), 39–52.
30.Zavattaro, S. M. (2013). Social Media in Public Administration’s Future: A Response to Farazmand. Administration & Society, 45(2), 242–255. http://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481602
31.Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 189–209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050