Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

ISSN: 2450-7733    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.53/1-09
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 53/1 2018
Handel wewnątrzregionalny produktami kultury i przemysłów kreatywnych wybranych ugrupowań integracyjnych
(Intra-regional trade in cultural and creative goods in selected regional groupings)

Authors: Monika Znojek
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: international trade intra-regional trade trade policy creative industries cultural industries regionalism regional trade groupings
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:13 (123-135)
Klasyfikacja JEL: F13 F14 Z10
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify trends in the development of intra-regional trade in trade in cultural and creative industries (CCI) of selected integration groups. The following indicators were used to assess changes in intra-regional trade in CCI goods: intraregional trade shares and intra-regional trade intensity index. The research shows that in the period 2005–2015 in three of the four analyzed groups (EU, NAFTA and ASEAN), the CCI goods trade was targeted at members of the group, while in one of them (MERCOSUR) – outside the grouping. The share of intra-regional trade in CCI trade in the analyzed groups was permanently lower than in their total trade. EU-25, MERCOSUR and NAFTA showed a lower intensity of internal trade in CCI goods than in trade in all products, while in ASEAN in some years the intensity of intra-regional trade in CCI goods was higher than the intensity of total internal trade. One of the reasons for the smaller role of internal trade in the CCI exchange than in the total exchange can be considered lower level of liberalization of trade in CCI goods than total goods, which results from the specificity of trade policy in trade with CCI products.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.ASEAN (2011). Declaration on ASEAN Unity in Cultural Diversity: Towards Strengthening ASEAN Community. Bali.
2.Bartsch, M. (2014). The Return of the Cultural Exception and its Impact on International Agreements. Global Media Journal, 4 (1) Pobrane z: http://globalmediajournal.
3.de/2014/06/21/the-return-of-the-cultural-exception-and-its-impact-on-international-agreements/ (10.05.2018).
4.Cheong, D. (2010). Methods for Ex Ante Economic Evaluation of Free Trade Agreements. Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, 52.
5.Formentini, S., Iapadre, L. (2007). Cultural Diversity and Regional Trade Agreements: The Case of Audiovisual Services (UNU-CRIS Working Papers). Bruges: UNU Insitute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies.
6.Galperin, H. (1999). Cultural Industries in the Age of Free-Trade Agreements. Canadian Journal of Communication, 24 (1). Pobrane z: https://cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1082/988 (5.05.2018).
7.Gomez, R., Munoz Larroa, A. (2014). Cultural Industries and Policy In Mexico and Canada After 20 Years of NAFTA. Norte America, 2, 173–204.
8.Kasprzak, R. (2013). Przemysły kreatywne w Polsce. Uwarunkowania i perspektywy. Warszawa: Kamon Consulting.
9.UNCTAD (2018). Creative Economy Database.
10.UNESCO (2017). Culture in Treaties and Agreements. Paris.
11.Unia Europejska (2018). Polityka audiowizualna i media. Pobrane z: https://europa.eu/european-union/topics/audiovisual-media_pl (8.05.2018).
12.Urząd Publikacji Unii Europejskiej (b.d.). Wyjątek kulturalny. EuroVoc Multilingual Thesaurus of the European Union. Pobrane z: http://eurovoc.europa.eu/6558 (8.05.2018).