Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2017.49/1-08
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 49/1 2017
Ocena możliwości wykorzystania aukcji jako narzędzia internalizacji efektów zewnętrznych i dostarczania dóbr publicznych w rolnictwie
(ASSESSMENT OF The possibility of applying auctions as a tool for internalisation of externalities and supply of public goods in agriculture)

Authors: Barbara Wieliczko
Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Keywords: agriculture public goods auctions
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:9 (87-95)
Klasyfikacja JEL: Q58 Q28 Q38
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The search for instruments enabling an increase in the effectiveness and efficiency of agricultural policy, including its environmental aspects, is more and more intense. In recent years, researchers have been analysing the characteristics of market instruments, of which auctions are particularly important. The article shows the possibilities of using auctions as an instrument for providing ecosystem services by agriculture and presents the results of research conducted so far in this field, pointing to the advantages and disadvantages of individual solutions. The analysis shows that auctions can be very cost-effective and cost-effective from an environmental point of view. However, this instrument still needs further research and detailed analysis before it can be more widely implemented in environmental practice.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bartczak, A., Krawczyk, M., Hanley, N., Stenger, A. (2014). Buying Spatially-Coordinated Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation on Forest Land: An Experiment on the Role of Auction Format and Communication. University of Warsaw. Faculty of Economic Sciences. Working Papers No. 19/2014 (136).
2.Boxall, P.C., Perger, O., Weber, M. (2013). Reverse Auctions for Agri-Environmental Improvements: Bid-Selection Rules and Pricing for Beneficial Management Practice Adoption. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 39, 23–36.
3.Conservation Reserve Program: Status and Current Issues (2011). Congressional Research Service.
4.Engel, S., Pagiola S., Wunder, S. (2008). Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674.
5.Kirwan, B., Lubowski, R.N., Roberts, M.J. (2005). How Cost-effective Are Land Retirement Auctions? Estimating the Difference between Payments and Willingness to Accept in the Conservation Reserve Program. American Journal of Agricultural Ecconomics, 87, 1239–1247.
6.Kulawik, J. (2016). Wybrane aspekty ekonomiczno-fiskalne zrównoważenia i wielofunkcyjności wsi i rolnictwa. Warszawa: IERiGŻ-PIB.
7.Latacz-Lohmann, U., van der Hamsvoort, C. (1997). Auctioning Conservation Contracts: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 407–418.
8.Latacz-Lohmann, U., van der Hamsvoort, C. (1998). Auctions as a Means of Creating a Market for Public Goods from Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 334–345.
9.Narloch, U., Pascual, U., Drucker, A.G. (2012). Collective Action Dynamics under External Rewards: Experimental Insights from Farming Communities in the Andes. World Development, 40, 2096–2107.
10.Reeson, A., Rodriguez, L.C., Whitten, S.M., Williams, K., Nolles, K., Windle, J., Rolfe, J. (2011). Adapting Auctions for the Provision of Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Scale. Ecological Economics, 70, 1621–1627.
11.Riley, J.G., Samuelson, W.F. (1981). Optimal Auctions. The American Economic Review, 71, 381–392.
12.Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1305/2013 z dnia 17 grudnia 2013 r. w sprawie wsparcia rozwoju obszarów wiejskich przez Europejski Fundusz Rolny na rzecz Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich (EFRROW) i uchylające rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1698/2005. Dz. Urz. UE L 347 z dnia 20 grudnia 2013 r.
13.Rozporządzenie Rady (WE) nr 1698/2005 z dnia 20 września 2005 r. w sprawie wsparcia rozwoju obszarów wiejskich przez Europejski Fundusz Rolny na rzecz Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich (EFRROW). Dz.U. L 277 z 21 października 2005 r.
14.Shoemaker, R., (1989). Agricultural Land Values and Rents under the Conservation Reserve Program. Land Economics, 65, 131–137.
15.Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., Strappazzon, L. (2003). Auctions for Conservation Contracts: An Empirical Examination of Victoria’s Bush Tender trial. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 477–500.
16.Takeda, M., Takahashi, D., Shobayashi, M. (2015). Collective Action vs. Conservation Auction: Lessons from a Social Experiment of a Collective Auction of Water Conservation Contracts in Japan. Land Use Policy, 46, 189–200.
17.Valle, H. (2012). Coordination and Strategic Behaviour in Landscape Auctions. Pobrano z: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/124466/1/2012AC%20Valle%20CP.pdf.
18.Wieliczko, B., Kurdyś-Kujawska, A., Herda, J. (2016). Mechanizmy i impulsy fiskalne oddziałujące na rozwój wsi i rolnictwa (2). Warszawa: IERiGŻ-PIB.