Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2017.47/1-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 47/1 2017
Regulacja rynku – ujęcie behawioralne
(Market regulation – behavioral approach)

Authors: Piotr Szkudlarek
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: regulation behavioral economy
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:12 (57-68)
Klasyfikacja JEL: K00 L50
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the concept of the use of behavioral economics in the regulatory policy. After the introductory remarks in the first section of the paper the issues concerning the regulation in the economy were presented. Another section includes selected problems regarding behavioral economics. In the third section the implications of behavioral economics in the regulatory policy were discussed. The possibilities of supplementing the gap related to the effi ciency of regulatory policy in the context of building a relationship between the regulator and the market players subjected to regulation were shown in the article.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Angner, E., Loewenstein, G. (2012). Behavioral Economics. W: Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Economics. Oxford–Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2.Arrow, K.J. (1985). The Potentials and Limits of the Market in Resource Allocation. W: G.R. Feiwel (red.), Issues in Contempory Microeconomics and Welfare (s. 107–124). London: The Macmillan Press.
3.Bator, F. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (3), 351–379.
4.Becker, G.S. (1983). A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, XCVIII, 371–400.
5.Borkowska, B. (2014). Paternalizm w państwowej regulacji rynków. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, 35 (3), 35–50.
6.Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism. Symposium Article. Pobrano z: http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/paternPLR.pdf (15.01.2017).
7.Crew, M.A., Rowley, Ch.K. (1988). Toward a Public Choice Theory of Monopoly Regulation. Public Choice, 57 (1), 49–67.
8.Dowling, M., Lucey, B. (2005). The Role of Feelings in Investor Decision-Making. Journal of Economics Surveys, 19 (2), 211–237.
9.Dudley, S.E., Brito, J. (2012). Regulation: A Primer. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Regulatory Studies Center.
10.Fox, C., Tversky, A. (1985). Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 585–603.
11.Godłów-Legiędź, J. (2013). Ekonomia behawioralna: od koncepcji racjonalności do wizji ustroju ekonomicznego. Ekonomia, 4 (25), 24–41.
12.Gorlewski, B. (2010). Podejście behawioralne w naukach ekonomicznych. Przykład ekonomik transportu. W: R. Bartkowiak, J. Ostaszewski (red.), Nauki ekonomiczne w świetle nowych wyzwań gospodarczych. Warszawa: SGH.
13.Hertog, J. (2010). Review of Economic Theories of Regulation. Utrecht: Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University.
14.Jasiński, P. (1996). Regulacja a transformacja systemowa. Zarys problematyki. Warszawa: INE PAN.
15.Joskow, P.L., Noll R.G. (1981). Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview. W: G. Fromm (red.), Studies in Public Regulation (s. 1–65). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.Kahn, A.E. (1990). Deregulation: Looking Backward and Looking Forward. Yale Journal on Regulation, 7 (2), 325–354.
17.Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
18.Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 313–327.
19.Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39 (4), 341–350.
20.Krueger, A.O. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-seeking Society. The American Economic Review, 64 (3), 291–303.
21.Loewenstein, G., Haisley, E. (2008). The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of “Light” Paternalism. W: C.A. Schotter (red.), Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations. The Handbook of Economic Methodologies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Pobrano z: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.588.6917&rep=rep1&type=pdf (15.01.2017).
22.Odean, T. (1998b). Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profi t When All Traders Are Above Average. Journal of Finance, 35 (6), 1887–1934.
23.Peltzman, S. (1989). The Economic Theory of Regulation after a Decade of Deregulation. Brookings Papers: Micoreconomics. University of Chicago. Pobrano z: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1989/01/1989_bpeamicro_peltzman.pdf (15.01.2017).
24.Posner, R.A. (1974). Theories of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5 (2), 335–358.
25.Posner, R.A. (1971). Taxation by Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 2 (1), 22–50.
26.Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
27.Shleifer, A. (2005). Understanding Regulation. European Financial Management, 11 (4), 439–451.
28.Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
29.Sołek, A. (2010). Ekonomia behawioralna a ekonomia neoklasyczna. Zeszyty Naukowe PTE, 8, 21–34.
30.Stigler, G.J. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 2, 3–21.
31.Szyszka, A. (2009). Finanse behawioralne. Nowe podejście do inwestow ania na rynku kapitałowym. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
32.Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.
33.Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consume Choice. Marketing Choice, 4, 199–214.
34.Vickers, J.S. (1991). Government Regulatory Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 7, 13–30.
35.Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.Zalewski, A. (2005). Reformy sektora publicznego w duchu nowego zarządzania publicznego. W: A. Zalewski (red.), Nowe zarządzanie publiczne w polskim samorządzie terytorialnym (s. 66–74). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGH.