Pedagogika Szkoły Wyższej

ISSN: 2083-4381    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/psw.2018.1-05
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 1/2018 (23)
Jak rozwiązywać trudne poznawczo problemy? Refleksyjność studentów programu Erasmus
(HOW TO SOLVE DIFFICULT COGNITIVE PROBLEMS? REFLEXIVITY OF ERASMUS STUDENTS)

Authors: Anna Perkowska-Klejman
Keywords: reflexivity student reflection Erasmus program Bologna system
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:16 (55-70)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The paper contains the original, preliminary empirical study of Erasmus students reflective judgment. It has been defined on the basis of the Reflective Judgment Model by King and Kitchener. The Model is structured in seven separate stages. The first, second and third have been defined by the term prereflective thought. Pre-reflectively thinking people are convinced of the absolute correctness/certainty of knowledge. The fourth and fifth stages correspond to thinking quasireflectively and are indicative of the assumption that knowledge contains elements of uncertainty and is context sensitive. Stages six and seven – reflective thinking – encompass the epistemological assumption that there is no single fixed in time understanding of the world. The aim was to compare the reflexivity levels amongst Erasmus students. The measurement of reflective judgment was conducted using a standardized interview – Reflective Judgment Inventory. Analysis of the results led to the conclusion, that Erasmus students showed higher level of reflection than other students.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalizacja. I co z tego dla ludzi wynika. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
2.Bauman, Z. (2007). Płynna nowoczesność. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
3.Beck, U. (2004). Społeczeństwo ryzyka. W drodze do innej nowoczesności. Warszawa: Scholar.
4.The Bologna Process 2020 (2009). The Bologna Process 2020 – The European Higher Education Area in
5.the new decade. Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education.
6.Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28–29 April 2009. Pobrane z: https://www.eurashe.eu/
7.library/modernising-phe/Bologna_2009_Leuven-Communique.pdf (12.03.2018).
8.Bryła, P. (2015). Self-reported Effects of and Satisfaction with International Student Mobility:
9.A Large-scale Survey among Polish Former Erasmus Students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral
10.Sciences, 191, 2074–2082.
11.Chmielecka, E., Kraśniewski, A., Woźnicki, J. (2003). Korzyści i koszty związane z przystąpieniem
12.Polski do Unii Europejskiej w sferze szkolnictwa wyższego. Warszawa: Urząd Komitetu Integracji
13.Europejskiej.
14.Dwyer, M. (2004). More Is Better: The Impact of Study Abroad Program Duration. The Interdisciplinary
15.Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 151–163.
16.Erasmus (2015). Erasmus – Facts, Figures & Trends. The European Union support for student and staff
17.exchanges and university cooperation in 2013–2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European
18.Union. Pobrane z: ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/library/statistics/erasmus-
19.-plus-facts-figures_en.pdf (25.10.2018).
20.The Erasmus Impact Study (2014). The Erasmus Impact Study, Effects of mobility on the skills and
21.employability of students and the internationalization of higher education institutions. Pobrane z:
22.https://esn.org/erasmus-impact-study (12.03.2018).
23.Fischer, K.W., Pruyne, E. (2003). Reflective thinking in adulthood: Emergence, development,
24.and variation. W: J. Demick, C. Andreoletti (red.), The Plenum series in adult development and
25.aging. Handbook of adult development (s. 169–198). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
26.Friedman, A.A. (2004). The Relationship Between Personality Traits and Reflective Judgment
27.Among Female Students. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 297–304.
28.FRSE (2007). Erasmus – co to dla mnie znaczy? 20-lecie programu Erasmus w Polsce. Warszawa: Fundacja
29.Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji.
30.Gazeta Prawna (2015). Decyzja PiS spowoduje likwidację programu Erasmus? Pobrane z: http://
31.serwisy.gazetaprawna.pl/edukacja/artykuly/903366,reforma-szkolnictwa-wyzszego-pissystem-
32.bolonski-jednolite-studia-magisterskie-licencjat-erasmus.html (10.11.2017).
33.Giddens, A. (2010). Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności. Warszawa:
34.Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
35.IES (2011). The IES Abroad MAP for Study Abroad Programs. Charting a course for quality. Chicago.
36.Pobrane z: https://www.iesabroad.org/system/files/IESAbroadMap2011.pdf (2018.02.23).
37.King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting
38.Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
39.King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S. (2002). The Reflective Judgment Model: Twenty Years of Research
40.on Epistemic Cognition. W: B.K. Hofer, P.R. Pintrich (red.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology
41.of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing (s. 37–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
42.Publishers.
43.King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S. (2004). Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development
44.of Epistemic Assumptions Through Adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39 (1), 5–18.
45.Kolanowska, E. (2008). 10 lat Erasmusa w Polsce 1998–2008. Warszawa: Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu
46.Edukacji.
47.Komisja Europejska (2013). Notatka. Pobrane z: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-
48.13-647_pl.htm (2017.10.03).
49.Krupnik, S., Krzaklewska, E. (2005). Studenci Erasmusa w Polsce. Raport z badania Erasmus Student
50.Network. Warszawa: Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji.
51.McKeown, J. (2009). The First Time Effect: The Impact of Study Abroad on College Student Intellectual
52.Development. New York: SUNY Press.
53.Majewska, D. (2015). PiS skasuje popularnego Erasmusa? I dobrze, bo mało kto jeździ tam studiować.
54.Pobrane z: http://natemat.pl/160689,pis-skasuje-popularnego-erasmusa-jedni-studencizalamuja-
55.rece-inni-je-zacieraja-z-radosci (10.11.2017).
56.Mines, R.A., King, P.M., Hood, A.B., Wood, P.K. (1990). Stages of intellectual development and
57.associated critical thinking skills in college students. Journal of College Student Development,
58.31, 538–547.
59.OECD (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. Executive Summary. Pobrane z:
60.http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf (17.11.2017).
61.Perkowska-Klejman, A. (2014a). Osądzanie refleksyjne – ocena intelektualnego rozwoju
62.uczniów, studentów i absolwentów. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 4, 69–84.
63.Perkowska-Klejman, A. (2014b). Zastosowanie modelu osądzania refleksyjnego do oceny rozwoju
64.intelektualnego dorosłych. Journal of Modern Science, 22 (3), 437–455.
65.Prodi, R. (2002). Celebration of the Erasmus Programme. Université Libre de Bruxelles. Brussels, 29
66.November 2002. Pobrane z: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-02-601_en.htm
67.(23.02.2018).
68.Saryusz-Wolski, T., Piotrowska, D. (2011). Internacjonalizacja: mobilność studentów.
69.W: M. Martyniuk (red.), Internacjonalizacja studiów wyższych (s. 43–55) Warszawa: Fundacja
70.Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.Scott, R.A. (1992). Campus Developments in Response to the Challenges of Internationalization: the case
72.of Ramapo College of New Jersey (USA). Springfield: CBIS Federal.
73.Strange, C., King, P.M. (1981). Intellectual development and its relationship to maturation during
74.the college years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 281–295.
75.Szubert, T. (2013). Program Erasmus w opinii polskich studentów. Warszawa: Fundacja Rozwoju
76.Systemu Edukacji.
77.Tvn24 (2015). PiS może likwidować studia dwustopniowe. Program Erasmus zagrożony? Pobrane z:
78.https://www.tvn24.pl/wiadomosci-z-kraju,3/pis-likwiduje-system-bolonski-ucierpi-natym-
79.program-erasmus,591417.html (10.11.2017).
80.Walczak, D. (2017). Za i przeciw międzynarodowej mobilności studentów i naukowców.
81.W: R. Siemieńska (red.), Uniwersytety, naukowcy i studenci w zglobalizowanym świecie (s. 123–
82.144). Warszawa: Scholar.
83.Wood, P.K., Kitchener, K.S., Jensen, L. (2002). Considerations in the design and evaluation of
84.a paper-and-pencil measure of reflective thinking. W: B.K. Hofer, P.R. Pintrich (red.), Personal
85.epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (s. 277–294). Mahwah:
86.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.