Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-19
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 4/2016
Kowenanty dywidendowe na rynku obligacji Catalyst
(Dividend Covenants on the Bond Market Catalyst)

Authors: Marek Pauka

Bogumiła Brycz
Keywords: covenants bond market Catalyst value transfer agency theory
Data publikacji całości:2016
Page range:12 (237-248)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Purpose – the concept of “empty shell”, described by F. Black, involving the transfer of value by the shareholders from the companies – issuers of bonds fairly well characterizes many difficult cases that could be found on the Catalyst market in the first years of its development. The aim of this article is to identify and analysis dividend covenants. Design/methodology/approach – authors conducted a qualitative research of covenants contained in the conditions of bond issued during period of 2009–2013 and analysed structure of covenants applying statistical methods. Findings – the paper presents the areas covered by dividends covenants. They are compared with possible opportunities available to owners of companies – issuers of bonds. Finally it is shown that the mitigation of the value transfer risk through the threat of the activation of the put option (the right of investors to early requests to repurchase bonds) primarily includes reducing the dividend payments, and (rarely) limitation of buy back, which does not prevent from value draining. Authors show the lack of relations between level of debt (and profitability) and the use of direct dividend covenants. Originality/value – The paper concerns the problem neglected so far in empirical research in Poland, and at the same time very important from the theoretical and practical perspective.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Black F. (1976). Dividend Puzzle. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2 (2), 5–8.
2.Black F., Scholes M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3), 637–654.
3.Bradley M., Roberts M.R. (2015). The structure and pricing of corporate debt covenants. The Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5 (2), 1550001(37).
4.Brycz B., Pauka M., Śmieja N. (2015a). Structure and restrictiveness of financial covenants in bond contracts on Catalyst. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 862. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 75, 67–81.
5.Brycz B., Pauka M., Śmieja N. (2015b). Znaczenie kowenantów na rynku obligacji korporacyjnych w teorii i w badaniach empirycznych – przegląd literatury. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 855. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 74 (t. 1), 23–34.
6.Galai D., Masulis R.W. (1976). The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1), 53–81.
7.Jensen M.C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76 (2), 323–329.
8.Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360.
9.Jung B., Lee W.J., Yang Y.S. (2015). The Impact of Dividend Covenants on Investment and Operating Performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43 (3–4), 414–447.
10.Kalay A. (1982). Dividend Constraints in Bond Covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 211–233.
11.Myers S.C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.
12.Nash R.C., Netter J.F., Poulsen A.B. (2003). Determinants of contractual relations between shareholders and bondholders: investment opportunities and restrictive covenants. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 201–232.
13.Niedziółka P. (2014). Zastosowanie kowenantów finansowych w bankowości korporacyjnej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 10 (934), 135–145.
14.Pauka M., Brycz B. (2011). Ocena polityki wypłat dywidend z wykorzystaniem rachunku przepływów pieniężnych – badania empiryczne, Problemy Zarządzania, vol. 9, nr 4, t. 2, s. 32–40.
15.Pauka M., Śmieja N. (2013). Zastosowanie kowenantów w warunkach emisji obligacji – badania empiryczne wśród emitentów z branży developerskiej w Polsce. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 766. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 62, 399–409.
16.Reisel N. (2014). On the value of restrictive covenants: Empirical investigation of public bond issues. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 251–268.
17.Sadrak M. (2016). Indeks Default Rate: Wskaźnik niewykupionych obligacji z Catalyst spadł do 3,1 proc. w I kw. Pobranoz z: Obligacje.pl, https://obligacje.pl/pl/a/indeks-default-rate-wskaznik-niewykupionych-obligacji-zcatalyst-spadl-do-3-1-proc-w-i-kw (30.04.2016).
18.Smith C.W., Warner J.B. (1979). On financial contracting. An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 117–161.
19.Szweda E. (2016). Podsumowanie tygodnia. Defaulty oswojone. Pobrano z: Obligacje.pl, https://obligacje.pl/pl/a/podsumowanie-tygodnia-defaulty-oswojone (30.04.2016).
20.Śmieja N., Pauka M. (2013). Analiza kowenantów w obligacjach korporacyjnych emitowanych przez niebankowe spółki z branży finansowej. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia, 47, 551–561.