Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

ISSN: 2450-8543     eISSN: 2353-317X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/cgs
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS

Reviewing Procedure

Reviewing procedure of scientific articles submitted for publication in «Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia»

1. Thematic editors of the issue make an initial assessment of the text submitted from the point of view of its conformity with the profile of the Journal and the basic requirements concerning the scientific methodology and input. Articles that do not comply with publication requirements are rejected.

2. The articles that have been accepted are sent to two independent reviewers who are affiliated with an academic institution that has to be different from the one represented by the author. The reviewers should reveal any conflict of interest, in particular:

  • direct personal relations (kinship, legal relations);
  • professional subordination;
  • direct academic cooperation up to two years before writing the reviews.

3. The articles should be reviewed anonymously (double-blind review process).

4. The current list of reviewers is published in each issue and on the Journal’s website, but the surnames of reviewers of a particular article are not revealed.

5. Rules of assessing articles and a reviewing form are made public on the Journal’s website.

6. Reviews are in written form and are basis for accepting or rejecting an article. If there is a controversy the final decision is made by the thematic editors together with the Scientific Council of CGS.

7. After the author(s) receive(s) the reviews they are obliged to proofread the text and take the reviewers’ comments – if there are any – into consideration.

8. Prior to publication every article undergoes a verification by the professional proofreader and by the editor of the publishing house. The author(s) should read all the remarks, suggestions of corrections of language mistakes and incorporate them into their article. After the editing process in the publishing house there is still the opportunity for the author(s) to correct the proofs. When the author discovers an error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor. Should the author(s), without justification, not observe the suggested remarks and correction suggestions, their article can eventually be rejected.

Before the article is accepted for publication, the authors have to sign the declaration on ghostwriting, which is to be found on the COLLOQUIA GERMANICA STETINENSIA journal’s website in the menu option “For Authors”, and send it to the Editorial Office; hereby the authors declare that:

• they present results of their own research;

• the submitted article is fully original and does not infringe any third-party rights (of natural or legal persons), and it has not been published anywhere before, irrespective of the character of the publisher;

• the author(s) incorporated the remarks of the reviewers in the article or that they do not agree with some of them – with a justification of their decision, which ultimately shall be verified by the editorial board.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to editorial decisions: Peer reviews assist the editor in making editorial decisions and may also help authors to improve their manuscript. Should the reviewer have critical remarks concerning the manuscript, they are to assess whether in spite of these the manuscript can be accepted for publication. If it is so, the reviewer should also formulate suggestions of improvements and/or additions to be made. The reviewer in such case can demand another insight in the corrected manuscript or – in case of remarks of lesser factual significance – leave the decision to the editorial board.

Competence and promptness: Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.

Confidentiality: The whole manuscript received for review must be treated as confidential document and shall not be used for personal profit. The manuscript must not be shown to or discussed with others except those authorized by the editor.

Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewers should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by authors. Any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper should be reported to the editor.

Standards of objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively and expressed clearly by means of appropriate arguments. The reviewed academic articles are confidential and reviewed anonymously (double-blind review process). Generally the reviewers and the author(s) have to be affiliated with different academic institutions. If, however, the reviewer knows the identity of the author and believes that there is a conflict of interests, they should notify the editorial board about this fact. The reviewers are obliged to disclose potential conflict of interests, pertinent in particular to:

  • direct personal relations (of kinship, legal connections)
  • professional subordination
  • collaborative relations in scholarly research within the past two years prior to the reviewing process.

For this purpose the reviewers are requested to fill in and sign the Reviewer’s declaration available on the website of the journal COLLOQUIA GERMANICA STETINENSIA in the menu option “Reviewing procedure”

Transparency of the reviewing procedure: The current list of reviewers is published in each issue and on the Journal’s website but the surnames of reviewers of a particular article are not revealed. Rules of assessing articles and a reviewing form are made public on the Journal’s website in the section “Reviewing procedure”. Reviews are in written form and are basis for accepting or rejecting an article. If there is a controversy, the final decision is made by the thematic editors together with the Academic Advisory Council of CGS.

 

Reviewers

Reviewers in 2021

  • dr hab. prof. UWr Edyta Błachut (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • Prof. Dr. Thorsten Carstensen (Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis)
  • Aa. Prof. Dr. Anna Fattori (Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata)
  • dr hab. prof. UJ Andrzej Feret (Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków)
  • dr hab. prof. UWr Dariusz Komorowski (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • dr hab. Joanna Ławnikowska-Koper (Uniwersytet Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczy im. Jana Długosza w Częstochowie)
  • dr hab. prof. US Krzysztof Nerlicki (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • prof. dr hab. Aldona Sopata (UAM, Poznań)

Reviewers in 2020

  • prof. dr hab. Paweł Bąk (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • dr hab. prof. UWr Edyta Błachut (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kątny (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • dr hab. prof. US Barbara Komenda-Earle (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. prof. UWr Dariusz Komorowski (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • dr hab. prof. US Jolanta Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • Prof. Dr. Harro Müller-Michaels (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)
  • dr hab. prof. UŚ Robert Rduch (Uniwersytet Śląski)
  • dr hab. prof. KUL Anna Rutka (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II)
  • prof. dr hab. Aldona Sopata (UAM, Poznań)
  • dr hab. prof. UMK Tomasz Waszak (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń)

Reviewers in 2019

  • dr hab. Edyta Błachut (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • Prof. Dr. Gisbert Fanselow (Universität Potsdam)
  • prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kątny (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • dr hab. Paweł Mecner, prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • Prof. Dr. Harro Müller-Michaels (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)
  • Univ.-Prof. Dr. Simon Neuberg (Universität Trier)
  • dr hab. prof. KUL Anna Rutka (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II)
  • prof. dr hab. Aldona Sopata (UAM, Poznań)
  • dr hab. Barbara Rodziewicz prof.US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. Tomasz Waszak (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (UAM, Poznań)

Reviewers in 2018

  • prof. dr hab. Paweł Bąk (Instytut Filologii Germańskiej, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • dr hab. Edyta Błachut (Instytut Filologii Germańskiej, Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • dr hab. Joanna Godlewicz-Adamiec (Uniwersytet Warszawski)
  • dr hab. Anna Górajek (Uniwersytet Warszawski)
  • prof. dr hab. Paweł Mecner (Instytut Filologii Germańskiej, Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • prof. dr hab. Aldona Sopata (Instytut Lingwistyki Stosowanej, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)

Reviewers in 2017

  • dr hab. Anna Dargiewicz prof. UWM (Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski, Olsztyn)
  • dr hab. Małgorzata Dubrowska prof. KUL (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski)
  • prof. dr Klaus Hammer (Politechnika Koszalińska)
  • dr hab. Artur Dariusz Kubacki prof. UP (Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny, Kraków)
  • dr hab. Krystyna Mihułka prof. URZ (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • prof. dr hab. Olga Molchanova (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. Hanna Pułaczewska prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. Robert Rduch (Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice)
  • prof. zw. dr hab. Marian Szczodrowski (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • dr hab. Janusz Taborek prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)

Reviewers in 2016

  • dr hab. Paweł Bąk prof. URz (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • dr hab. Małgorzata Dubrowska prof. KUL (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski)
  • prof. dr Klaus Hammer (Politechnika Koszalińska)
  • dr hab. Dariusz Komorowski (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • prof. dr hab. Elizaveta Kotorova (Uniwersytet Zielonogórski)
  • prof. dr hab. Ryszard Lipczuk (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • prof. dr hab. Grażyna Łopuszańska-Kryszczuk (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • Prof. Dr. Karl Heinz Ramers (Universität Rostock)
  • prof. dr hab. Roman Sadziński (Uniwersytet Łódzki)
  • Prof. Dr. Jürgen Schiewe (Universität Greifswald)
  • dr hab. Joanna Szczęk (Uniwersytet Wrocławski)
  • dr hab. Tomasz Waszak (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)
  • Prof. Dr. Hans Dieter Zimmermann (Technische Universität Berlin)

Reviewers in 2015

  • prof. dr hab. Roman Dziergwa (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)
  • Prof. Dr. Carsten Gansel (Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen)
  • prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kątny (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • dr hab. Krzysztof Nerlicki prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • Prof. Dr. Karl Heinz Ramers (Universität Rostock)
  • prof. dr hab. Roman Sadziński (Uniwersytet Łódzki)
  • dr hab. Piotr Sulikowski prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. Tomasz Waszak (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń)

Reviewers in 2014

  • Ao. Prof. Anna Fattori (Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata)
  • dr hab. Joanna Golonka prof. URz (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Günther Höfler (Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz)
  • prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kątny (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • dr hab. Krzysztof Nerlicki prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • Prof. Dr. Malcolm Pender (University of Strathclyde, Glasgow)
  • Prof. Dr. Karl Heinz Ramers (Universität Rostock)
  • prof. dr hab. Roman Sadziński (Uniwersytet Łódzki)
  • dr hab. Piotr Sulikowski prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • dr hab. Tomasz Waszak (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)
  • Prof. Dr. Hans Dieter Zimmermann (Technische Universität Berlin)

Reviewers in 2013

  • dr hab. Joanna Golonka prof. URz (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski)
  • dr hab. Ewelina Kamińska prof. US (Uniwersytet Szczeciński)
  • prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kątny (Uniwersytet Gdański)
  • Prof. Dr. Malcolm Pender (University of Strathclyde, Glasgow)
  • Prof. Dr. Karl Heinz Ramers (Universität Rostock)
  • dr hab. Anna Rutka prof. KUL (Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski)
  • dr hab. Monika Szczepaniak prof. UKW (Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego, Bydgoszcz)
  • dr hab. Maria Wojtczak prof. UAM (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań)
  • Prof. Dr. Erika Worbs (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz)