Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis


ISSN: 2083-4373    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2015.12-01
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 4/2015 (12)
Uwagi na temat siły i jej stosowania w prawie międzynarodowym
(COMMENTS ON THE FORCE AND ITS APPLICATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW)

Authors: Łaski Piotr
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: armed-force force public international law reprisal self-defense
Data publikacji całości:2015
Page range:24 (61-84)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 1383

Abstract

The concept of the use force currently refer to situations in which violence is used in a manner close to the technical characteristics of a state of war, as well as to the military action does not encountering armed resistance. Public international law has no special measures that regulate recourse to use of force, or those that minimize the effects of its application. In international law, despite the many controversies regarding the use of force, there is no doubt about the competence of states to its application in order to pursue their raison d’etat. However, consideration should be given understanding the concept of “power” and its application in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, for the purposes of self-defense, so that it explicitly distinguished from the situation recourse to an act of armed (which is a manifestation of the use of force), violating the territorial integrity of another sovereign state. In this article, theoretical considerations will be raised to the actions of the Russian Federation, among others, as an example of the use force in contemporary international law.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Barcik J., Akt terrorystyczny i jego sprawa w świetle prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2004.
2.Barcik J., Srogosz T., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, Warszawa 2014.
3.Bowett D.W., The Use of Force for the Protection of Nationals Abroad, w: The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force, Oxford 1986.
4.Conuiff M.L., Panama and the United States. The Forced Alliance, Athens 1992.81Uwagi na temat si ły i jej stosowania...
5.Crawford J., Democracy and International Law, „British Yearbook of International Law” 1993, vol. 44.
6.Crépon P., Religia a wojna, Gdańsk 1994.
7.Czapliński W., Wyrozumska A., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa 2004.
8.Delbrück J., The Fight Against Global Terrorism: Self-defence or Collective Security as International Police Action? Some Comments on the International Legal Implications of the „War against Terrorism”, „German Yearbook of International Law” 2001, vol. 44
9.Diccionario Enciclopedico Abreviado, Madrid 1933, t. 2.
10.Dictionnaire Quillet de la langue francaise, Paris 1959, t. 1.
11.Dinstein Y., The Conduct of Hostilities under the law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge 2004.
12.Doswald-Beck L., The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government, „British Yearbook of International Law” 1985, vol. 56.
13.Ehrlich L., Interpretacja traktatów, Warszawa 1957.
14.Frowein J.A., Unilateral Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions – a Threat to Collective Security, w: Liber amicorum Günther Jaenicke, red. V. Götz et al., Berlin–Heidelberg 1998.
15.Gibney F., Korea’s Quiet Revolution: From Garrison State to Democracy, New York 1992.
16.Gilmore W., The Grenada Intervention, London 1984.
17.Gray C., From Unity to Polarization. International Law and the Use of Force against Iraq, „European Journal of International Law” 2002, vol. 12, no. 1.
18.Green L.C., Rescue at Entebbe – Legal Aspects, „Israel Yearbook of Human Rights” 1976, vol. 6.
19.Greenwood C., The Twilight of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals, „Netherland Yearbook of International Law” 1989, vol. 20.
20.Haraszti G., Some Fundamental Problems of the Law of Treaties, Budapest 1973. International Court of Justice Reports 1980, 1986. International Legal Reports 1986.
21.Jacewicz A., Pojęcie siły w Karcie Narodów Zjednoczonych, Warszawa 1977.
22.Keegan J., History of Warfare, London 1993.
23.Kowalski M., Prawo do samoobrony jako środek zwalczania terroryzmu międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2013.
24.Kranz J., Użycie siły zbrojnej – nowe fakty i tendencje, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe” 2006, nr 3.
25.Krisiotis D., The Legality of the 1983 US Missile Strike on Iraq and the Right of Self-defence in International Law, „International and Comperative Law Quartely” 1996, vol. 45.
26.Longman Dictionary of English Laguage and Culture, Oxford 1992.
27.Mc Lain P., Setting the Score with Saddam: Resolution 1441 and Parallel Justifications for the Use Force Against Iraq, „Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law” 2003, vol. 13, no. 1.
28.Murphy S.D., Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law, „American Journal of International Law”, 1999, vol. 93, no. 1.
29.Murphy S.D., Terrorism and the Concept of „Armed Attack” in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, „Harvard International Law Journal” 2002, vol. 43.
30.Nicholls D., From Dessalines to Duvalier: The Race, Colour and National Dependence in Haiti, London 1996.
31.Pattison J., Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford 2012.
32.Pokempner D., Terrorism and Human Rights: The Legal Framework, w: Terrorism and International Law, red. M. Schmitt, G.L. Berutto, San Remo 2003.
33.Schweisfurth T., Operations to Rescue Nationals in Third States Involving the Use of Force in Relation to Protection of Human Rights, „German Yearbook of International Law” 1980.
34.Shaw M.N, Some Legal Aspects of the Entebbe Incident, „Jewish Law Annual” 1978.
35.Shaw M.N., Prawo międzynarodowe, Warszawa 2011.
36.Słowar russkogo jazyka w czetyriech tomach, Moskwa 1961, t. 4.
37.Tomuschart Ch., Der 11 September 2001 und seune rechtlichen konsequenzen, „Europaische Grundrechte-Zeitschriff” 2001, Nr. 28.
38.Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa 2003, t. 3.
39.Wilmshurst E., International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford 2012.
40.Wybór dokumentów do nauki prawa międzynarodowego, oprac. K. Kocot, K. Wolfke, Wrocław–Warszawa 1976.
41.Zajadło J., Dylematy humanitarnej interwencji, Gdańsk 2005