Acta Biologica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Biologica

ISSN: 2450-8330     eISSN: 2353-3013    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ab.2020.27-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ

Issue archive / No. 27
A note on centrifugation for improving freshwater invertebrate sample conservation

Authors: Antonio G. Valdecasas ORCID
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006-Madrid, Spain

Ricardo García-Jiménez ORCID
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006-Madrid, Spain

Mercedes Marín F.-Campoamor ORCID
Paseo de la Chopera, 11. 28045 – Madrid. Spain
Keywords: live sorting sampling trips optimal sample conservation benthos streams
Data publikacji całości:2020
Page range:9 (21-29)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Sorting of freshwater invertebrate samples is best done while the animals are still alive. However, sorting in the field generally means less overall sampling can be done in the allotted time. Placing samples under cold conditions has been the traditional way to extend the life of the organisms contained within them. In this work, we evaluated whether the addition of a centrifugation step extends the survival time of organisms post-sampling, thus providing more time for sorting. Three salad spinners were tested for their capacity to extract water from samples. Additional observations were made on the compaction of samples due to excessive centrifugation. We conclude that adding a short centrifugation step of 30 seconds prolongs the life of several freshwater invertebrate taxa, including Hydrachnidia, Nematoda and Ostracoda. Furthermore, when fixation of samples in the field is necessary, centrifugation reduces the amount of fixative to be added to the samples to reach a certain concentration. Fixed samples can also be centrifuged, which may be particularly relevant when sampling abroad as inflam-mable liquids are often prohibited on planes. In our experience, centrifuging fixed samples does not compromise the fixed organisms, or their genetic material.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Anderson, J.T., Zilli, F.L., Montalto, L., Marchese, M.R., McKinney, M., Park, Y.L. (2013). Sampling and
2.Processing Aquatic and Terrestrial Invertebrates in Wetlands. In: J. Anderson, C. Davis (eds.), Wetland
3.Techniques. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
4.Andreu, E., Camacho, A. (2002). Recommendations for sampling water, biota and bottom sediments in Ramsar
5.wetlands (bilingual Spanish-English). Madrid: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
6.García-Jiménez, R., Horreo, J.L., Valdecasas, A.G. (2017). Minimal barcode distance between two water mite
7.species from Madeira Island: a cautionary tale. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 72, 133–143. DOI:
8.10.1007/s10493-017-0147-5.
9.Hauer, F.R., Resh, V.H. (2006). Macroinvertebrates. In: F.R. Hauer, G. Lamberti (eds.), Methods in Stream
10.Ecology (chapter 20). Academic Press.
11.Kalloniatis, M., Luu, C. (2007). Visual Acuity by Michael Kalloniatis and Charles Luu. Webvision. The
12.Organization of the Retina and Visual System, 5. Retrieved from: https://webvision.med.utah.edu/ book/part-viii-
13.psychophysics-of-vision/visual-acuity.
14.Schwoerbel, J. (1970). Methods in Hydrobiology. Pergamon Press.
15.Stryjecki, R., Bankowska, A., Szenejko, M. (2018). A faunistic and ecological characterization of the water
16.mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia) of the Bukowa River (central-eastern Poland). Acta Biologica, 25,77–94.
17.Tachet, H. (2000). Invertébrés d’eau douce. Sytematique, biologie, ecologie. Paris: CNRS editions.
18.Valdecasas, A.G., Aboal, M., Cirujano, S., Iepure, S., Jaume, D., Proctor, H., Velasco, J. L. (2010). Sampling
19.continental freshwater. In: J. Eymann, J. Degreef, C. Häuser, J.C. Monje, Y. Samyn, D. Vandenspiegel (eds.),
20.Manual on Field Recording Techniques and Protocols for All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories (pp. 213–272). Abc
21.Taxa cap. 10.