| Autorzy: |
Małgorzata
Sokół
University of Szczecin, Szczecin |
| Słowa kluczowe: | blog medyczny tożsamość wiedza predykaty epistemiczne |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2021 |
| Liczba stron: | 20 (161-180) |
| 1. | Ädel, Annelie. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006. |
| 2. | Atkinson, Dwight. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999. |
| 3. | Benwell, Bethan, Elizabeth Stokoe. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. |
| 4. | Blanchard, Antoine. “Science blogs in research and popularization of science: Why, how, and for whom?” In: Common knowledge: The challenge of transdisciplinarity, ed. Moira Cockell, Jérôme Billotte, Frédéric Darbellay, Francis Waldvogel, 219–232. Lausanne: EPFL Press, 2011. |
| 5. | Bolander, Brook, Miriam A. Locher. “Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues”. Discourse, Context & Media 3 (2014): 14–26. |
| 6. | Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. |
| 7. | Crismore, Avon. Metadiscourse: What is it and how is it used in school and non-school social science texts. Urbana–Champaign: University of Illinois, 1983. |
| 8. | Dafouz-Milne, Emma. “Metadiscourse revisited: A contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse”. Regreso al metadiscurso: estudio contrastivo de la persuasión en el discurso profesional. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 11 (2003): 29–52. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/EIUC/article/view/EIUC0303110029A. |
| 9. | Danielewiczowa, Magdalena. Wiedza i niewiedza: Studium polskich czasowników epistemicznych. Warszawa: Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej UW, 2002. |
| 10. | De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, Michael Bamberg. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. |
| 11. | Englebretson, Robert, ed. Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007. |
| 12. | Facchinetti, Roberta. “Modal verbs in news-related blogs: When the blogger counts”. In: English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, ed. Juana Isabel Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero Lapeyre, Jorge Arús Hita, Johan van der Auwera, 359–377. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013. |
| 13. | Giner, Diana. “Rhetorical strategies of persuasion in the reasoning of international investment arbitral awards”. In: Power, persuasion and manipulation in specialised genres: providing keys to the rhetoric of professional communities, ed. Maria Ángeles Orts Llopis, Ruth Breeze, Maurizio Gotti, 243–265. Bern: Peter Lang, 2017. |
| 14. | Grieve Jack, Biber Douglas, Friginal Eric, Nekrasova Tatiana. “Variation among blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis”. In: Genres on the web. Computational models and empirical studies, ed. Alexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff, Marina Santini, 303–322. Berlin: Springer, 2010. |
| 15. | Harré, Rom, Luk van Langenhove, eds. Positioning theory. Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. |
| 16. | Harvey, Kevin, Nelya Koteyko. Exploring health communication. Language in action. London–New York: Routledge, 2013. |
| 17. | Herring, Susan, Ann Lois Scheidt, Sabrina Bonus, Elijah Wright. “Weblogs as a bridging genre”. Information, Technology & People 18 (2005), 22: 142–171. |
| 18. | Hidalgo Downing, Laura, Begoña Núñez Perucha. “Modality and personal pronouns as indexical markers of stance: Intersubjective positioning and construction of public identity in media interviews”. In: English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, ed. Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, Johan van der Auwera, 379–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013. |
| 19. | Hübler, Axel. Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1983. |
| 20. | Hunston, Susan, Geoff Thompson, eds. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. |
| 21. | Hyland, Ken. Metadiscourse. London–New York: Continuum, 2005. |
| 22. | Hyland, Ken. “Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles”. Applied Linguistics 17 (1996), 4: 433–454. |
| 23. | Kärkkäinen, Elise. Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on “I think”. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2003. |
| 24. | Luzón, Maria José. “Recontextualising expert discourse in weblogs: Strategies to communicate health research to experts and the interested public”. In: Insights into medical communication, ed. Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maria Maci, Michele Sala, 331–351. Bern: Peter Lang, 2015. |
| 25. | Maci, Stefania Maria, Michele Sala, Maurizio Gotti. “Introduction”. In: Insights into medical communication, ed. Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maria Maci, Michele Sala, 9–24. Bern: Peter Lang, 2015. |
| 26. | Marín-Arrese, Juana I. “Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: Legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility”. In: Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, ed. Christopher Hart, 193–223. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011. |
| 27. | Marín-Arrese, Juana I. “Stancetaking and inter/subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown”. In: English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, ed. Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, |
| 28. | Jorge Arús Hita, Johan van der Auwera, 411–445. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013. |
| 29. | Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Laura Hidalgo Downing, Silvia Molina. “Evidential, epistemic and deontic modality in English and Spanish: The expression of writer stance in newspaper discourse”. In: English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies, ed. Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, 121–139. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2004. |
| 30. | Markham, Anette, Elizabeth Buchanan. “Ethical decision-making and Internet research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version2.0)” (2012). http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. |
| 31. | Markkanen, Raija. “Hedging and modality”. In: Probleme der Modalität in der Sprachforschung (Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia 23), ed. Ahti Jäntti. Jyväskylä, 137–148. Jyväskylä University Press, 1989. |
| 32. | Markkanen, Raija, Hartmut Schröder. “Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis”. In: Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, ed. Raija Markkanen, Hartmut Schröder, 3–18. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. |
| 33. | Martin, James R., Peter R.R. White. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. |
| 34. | Myers, Greg. The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum, 2010. |
| 35. | Myers, Greg. “The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles”. Applied Linguistics 10 (1989): 1–35. |
| 36. | Nuyts, Jan. Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization. A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000. |
| 37. | Palmer, Frank Robert. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. |
| 38. | Prestin, Abby, Wen-ying S. Chou. “Web 2.0 and the changing health communication environment”. In: The Routledge handbook of language and health communication, ed. Heidi E. Hamilton, Wen-ying S. Chou, 184–197. New York: Routledge, 2014. |
| 39. | Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader, Charles Bosk. “On hedging in physician-physician discourse”. In: Linguistics and the professions. Proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies, ed. Robert J. di Pietro. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1982. |
| 40. | Puschmann, Cornelius. “Blogging”. In: The handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, ed. Susan. C. Herring, Dieter Stein, Tuija Virtanen, 83–108. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013. |
| 41. | Puschmann, Cornelius, Merja Mahrt. “Scholarly blogging: A new form of publishing or science journalism 2.0?” In: Science and the Internet, ed. Alexander Tokar, Michael Beurskens, Susanne Keuneke, Merja Mahrt, Isabella. Peters, Cornelius Puschmann, Timo van Treeck, Katrin Weller, 171–181. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press, 2012. |
| 42. | Rettberg, Jill W. Blogging. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008. |
| 43. | Salager-Meyer, Françoise. “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse”. English for Specific Purposes 13 (1994): 149–170. |
| 44. | Sokół, Małgorzata. “‘Have you wondered why sportspeople die?’ The medical weblog as a popularisation tool”. Discourse, Context & Media 25 (2018): 13–24. |
| 45. | Sowińska, Agnieszka. “‘Even if there were procedures, we will be acting at our own discretion...’ General practitioners’ struggle about identity”. In: Identity struggle: Evidence from workplaces across the world, ed. Dorien Van Den Mieroop, Stephanie Schnurr, 281–298. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2017. |
| 46. | Stermieri, Anna. “Knowledge dissemination in genetics blogs”. In: Insights into medical communication, ed. Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maria Maci, Michele Sala, 391–413. Bern: Peter Lang, 2015. |
| 47. | Thomas, Jenny. Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London–New York: Longman, 1995. |
| 48. | Thompson, Geoff, Laura Alba-Juez, eds. Evaluation in context. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. |
| 49. | Turnbull, Judith. “Knowledge dissemination online: The case of health information”. In: Insights into medical communication, ed. Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani, Davide Mazzi, 290–314. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016. |
| 50. | van Dijk, Teun A. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. |
| 51. | Vande Kopple, William. “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication 36 (1985): 82–93. |
| 52. | Varttala, Teppo. “Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (1999), 2: 177–200. |
| 53. | Vázquez, Ignacio, Diana Giner. “Contrastive study of international commercial arbitration awards and court judgments: Intertextuality through metadiscourse in action”. In: Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations, ed. Vijay K. Bhatia, Giuliana Garzone, Chiara Degano, 171–191. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. |
| 54. | White, Peter R.R. “Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse – a new framework for analysis”. In: Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies, ed. Inger Lassen, 37–69. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006. |
