Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.52/3-19
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 52/3 2018
Sprawiedliwość wynagradzania a zaangażowanie pracowników
(Compensation justice and employee engagement)

Authors: Marta Juchnowicz
Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie Instytut Kapitału Ludzkiego

Hanna Kinowska
Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie Instytut Kapitału Ludzkiego
Keywords: compensation organizational justice engagement
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:11 (199-209)
Klasyfikacja JEL: J31 M52 M54
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the relationship between employee engagement and remuneration justice. Judgment of justice requires the determination of its identity. The need to redefine the concept of justice used in the field of management science was noticed. It indicated the nature of engagement and its connections with justice. Based on the results of empirical research the remuneration justice of Polish employees was diagnosed. The aspects of engagement correlated with the perception of justice were investigated. The conclusions from the conducted analysis contain the directions for further research into fairness of remuneration.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Adams, S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. W: L. Berkowitz (red.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (s. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
2.Aon Hewitt (2017). Trends in Global Employee Engagement. Global anxiety erodes employee engagement gains. Pobrano z: http://www.aon.com/unitedkingdom/attachments/trp/2017-Trends-in-Global-Employee-Engagement.pdf.
3.Arystoteles (1956). Etyka nikomachejska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
4.Bies, R.J. (2001). Interactional in (justice): the sacred and the profane. W: J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (red.), Advances in Organizational Justice (s. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University.
5.Card, D., Mas, A., Moretti, E., Saez, E. (2012). Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 6 (102), 2981–3003. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.6.2981.
6.Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C., Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
7.Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 6 (31), 874–899. DOI: 10.1177/0149206305279602.
8.Furnham, A. (2014). Justice at work in aid and development. W: Fairness in Aid Work Remuneration: A Human Resources Perspective. Workshop funded by ESRC/DFID, 3 April. London: University College.
9.Juchnowicz, M. (2012). Zaangażowanie pracowników. Sposoby oceny i motywowania. Warszawa: PWE.
10.Juchnowicz, M., Kinowska, H. (2017). Strategie wynagrodzeń w różnych strategiach biznesowych. W: A. Sopińska, P. Wachowiak (red.), Wyzwania współczesnego zarządzania strategicznego (s. 465–478). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
11.Kinowska, H. (2009). The influence of chosen structural factors on employee engagement. Education of Economists and Managers, 3 (13), 61–76.
12.Mumford, K.A., Smith, P.N. (2012). Peer salaries and employee satisfaction in the workplace. IZA Discussion Paper, 6673. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
13.Petersen, B.K. (2014). Justice and culture in the perception of compensation fairness. Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia, 11, 9–24. DOI: 10.15678/AOC.2014.1102.
14.Shuck, B., Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: a seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (9), 89–110. DOI: 10.1177/1534484309353560.
15.Thibaut, J., Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
16.Turek D. (2011). Sprawiedliwość organizacyjna w przedsiębiorstwie. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 1, 41–45.
17.Wratny, J. (2015). Prawo do wynagrodzenia za pracę w świetle zasad sprawiedliwości i równości. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia, 2 (62), 297–315. DOI: 10.17951/g.2015.62.2.297.