Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.52/3-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 52/3 2018
Próba operacjonalizacji kategorii „zaangażowanie pracowników”: model – zmienna
(Attempt to operationalization of the category “involvement of employess”: model, type, variable)

Authors: Grażyna Gruszczyńska-Malec
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach Wydział Zarządzania

Łucja Waligóra
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach Wydział Zarządzania
Keywords: employee involvement models and engagement variables
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:10 (39-48)
Klasyfikacja JEL: M12 M14 M51 M54
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Employee involvement in work is recognized as an effort put into activities performed, which is associated with some voluntary emotional penetration and increasing activity in the work performed. In the article, the authors made a comparison of models and variables shaping the employee’s involvement, listed in the subject literature. The aim of this publication is to indicate which variables of involvement are most often given in the scientific literature.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Cook, S. (2008). The Essential Guide to Employee Engagement. Better Business Performance through Staff Satisfaction. London: Kogan Page.
2.Fleck, S., Inceoglu, I. (2010). A comprehensive framework for understanding and predicting engagement. W: S.L. Albrecht (red.), Handbook of Employee Engagement. Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice (s. 33–39). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
3.Hall, R.E., Taylor, J.B. (2000). Makroekonomia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
4.Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Keyes, C.L.M. (2003). Well-Being in the Workplace and its Relationships to Business Outcomes. Flourishing: the Positive Person and the Good Life, 25, 205–244.
5.Hubbard, D.W. (2007). How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
6.Jamka, B. (2011). Czynnik ludzki we współczesnym przedsiębiorstwie: zasób czy kapitał? Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
7.Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J. (1991). A Tree-Component Conceptualization on Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
8.Robinson, D., Perryman, S., Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Report 408. Institute for Employment Studies. Pobrano z: https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/408.pdf (12.03.2018).
9.Sanborn, P., Malhotra, R., Atchison, A. (2017). Trends in Global Employee Engagement. Consulting Talent & Organization. Aon Hewitt, 12–14. Pobrano z: http://www.aon.com/attachments/thought-leadership/Trends_Global_Employee_Engagement_Final.pdf (12.03.2018).
10.Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonz´alez-Rom´a, V., Bakker, A.B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
11.Seligman, M.E.P. (2011). Flourish. New York: Free Press.
12.Skrzypek, E. (2009). Podejście procesowe w organizacjach. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
13.Witt, L.A., Andrews, M.C., Kacmar, K.M. (2000). The role of participation in decision-making in the organizational politics-job satisfaction relationship. Human Relations, 3 (53), 341–358.