ISSN: 2450-7733
eISSN: 2300-4096
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.51/3-10
Issue archive /
nr 51/3 2018
Financial risk evaluation for international supply chain projects
| Authors: |
Marcin
Halicki
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski Wydział Biologiczno-Rolniczy Andreas Uphaus The Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Business and Health |
| Keywords: | projects risk measures risk assessment Foster-Hart measure real option |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2018 |
| Page range: | 10 (113-122) |
| Klasyfikacja JEL: | G23 B26 |
Abstract
The article presents the basic aspects of fi nancial risk in international supply chain projects. The aim of the article is to draw attention to the fact that no method has so far been developed to measure this risk and to evaluate projects for rejection or acceptance, taking into account a possible bankruptcy of the entity implementing such projects. Thus, the basic risk measures are presented and the Foster-Hart measure is proposed for such a measurement, showing its basic features and advantages. In addition, it is pointed out that the instrument allowing the assessment of projects offers real options that can be put to value during projects and be used as part of the fi nancial risk measurement of international supply chain projects.
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance, 3 (9), 203–228. |
| 2. | Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Option Perspektive. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2 (19), 43–84. |
| 3. | Boyce, T. (2003). Project Risk Management: The Commercial Dimension. London: Thorogood. BS ISO 21500: 2012. (2012). Guidance on project management. |
| 4. | Chopra, S., Meindl, P. (2010). Supply Chain Management, Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Prentice Hall: Pearson. |
| 5. | Damodaran, A. (2014). Applied Corporate Finance. 4th edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons. |
| 6. | Deutsch, H.-P. (2002). Derivatives and Internal Models. London: Palgrave Macmillan.. |
| 7. | Eiteman, D.K., Stonehill, A.I., Moffet, M.H. (2013). Multinational Business Finance. 13th ed. Pearson Series in Finance. |
| 8. | Foster, D.P., Hart, S. (2009). An Operational Measure of Riskiness. Journal of Political Economy, 5 (117), 785–814. |
| 9. | Gleißner, W. (2017). Grundlagen des Risikomanagements. 3rd. ed. München: Vahlen Verlag. |
| 10. | Haralambides, H.E. (1991). Monte Carlo Simulation in Risk Analysis. Financial Management, 2 (20), 15–16. |
| 11. | Hellmann, T., Riedel, F. (2015). A dynamic extension of the Foster–Hart measure of riskiness. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 59, 66–70. |
| 12. | Kendrick, T. (2009), Identifying and Managing Project Risk. 2nd ed. Boston: AMACOM. |
| 13. | Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. USA: John Wiley & Sons. |
| 14. | Kumar, R.L. (2002). Managing risks in IT projects: an option perspective. Information & Management, 40, 63–74. |
| 15. | Linsmeier, T.J., Pearson, N.D. (2000), Value at Risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 2 (56), 47–67. |
| 16. | Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 1 (7), 77–91. |
| 17. | Myers, S.C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of fi nancial economics, 2 (5), 147–175. |
| 18. | PRINCE2 (2012). Glossary of Terms. The Stationery Offi ce (TSO). |
| 19. | Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. (PMBOK guide). Project Management Institute. |
| 20. | Sharpe, W.F. (1963). A Simplifi ed Model for Portfolio Analysis. Management Science, 2 (9), 277–293. |
| 21. | Vanhoucke, M. (2012). Project Management with Dynamic Scheduling. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25175-7. |