Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.51/3-08
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 51/3 2018
Impact of information about risk on the attractiveness of tourist travel

Authors: Maria Forlicz
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu Instytut Ekonomii

Tomasz Rólczyński
Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu Wydział Finansów i Zarządzania

Julita Markiewicz-Patkowska
Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu Wydział Finansów i Zarządzania

Piotr Oleśniewicz
Akadamia Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu Instytut Turystyki i Rekreacji
Keywords: risk rational choice tourism
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:12 (89-100)
Klasyfikacja JEL: D12 Z30
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to investigate how information on the two kinds of risk (natural and involving human activity) varying in their level infl uences the assessment of holiday attractiveness. The impact of a political and natural risk on the assessment of attractiveness of tourist offers was evaluated. The achievement of the paper’s objective was done based on an experimental study carried out on 353 individuals studying at two different higher education institutions. The data obtained were subject to statistical analysis using classic and location descriptive measures, linear regression and statistical tests such as one-way ANOVA. We did not fi nd evidence that people react differently to different risks, but the results indicate that the sensitivity of measures of reaction (changes in prices and attractiveness) is not the same.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bahill, A.T., Madni, A.M. (2016). Tradeoff decisions in system design. Springer International Publishing.
2.Bishop, R., Heberlein, T. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5 (61), 926–930.
3.Botelho, A., Pinto, L. (2002). Hypothetical, real, and predicted real willingness to pay in open-ended surveys: experimental results. Applied Economics Letters, 9 (15), 993–996.
4.Chang, J., Lusk, J., Norwood, F. (2009). How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict fi eld behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2 (91), 518–534.
5.Dohmen, T. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. IZA Discussion Papers, no. 1730,
6.Duarte, F., Rosa, C. (2015). The Equity Risk Premium: A Review of Models. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 714.
7.Fifer, S. (2011). Hypothetical bias in stated preference experiments: is it a problem? And if so, how do we deal with it? Retrieved from: http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/7923/1/sj-fi fer-2011-thesis.pdf (20.10.2015).
8.Forlicz, M., Rólczyński, T. (2016). Hipotetyczne i rzeczywiste decyzje podejmowane w warunkach ryzyka. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 301, 25–43.
9.Gonzalez, R., Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129–166.
10.Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.
11.Knetsch, J.L., Sinden, J.A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3 (99), 507–521.
12.List, J., Shogren, J. (1998). Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a fi eld experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 193–205.
13.Neill, H., Cummings, R., Ganderton, P., Harrison, G., McGukin, T. (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70, 145–154.
14.Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
15.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decision and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–463.
16.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, 4 (59), 251–278.
17.Wakker, P., Thaler, R.H., Tversky, A. (1997). Probabilistic Insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1 (15), 7–28.
18.Weber, J. (2015). Essays in fi nancial literacy & decision making. PhD thesis. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.