Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2017.50/2-08
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 50/2 2017
Neuroekonomia a paradygmat ekonomii głównego nurtu
(Neuroeconomics versus the paradigm of mainstream economics)

Authors: Marian Noga
Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu
Keywords: neuroeconomics neuromacroeconomics paradigm of mainstream economics
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:12 (101-112)
Klasyfikacja JEL: A10
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

In the article the Author states that paradigm of mainstream economics must undergo [rather than liquidation] by including in them achievements of new science of neuroeconomics. Moreover the Author proposes the knowledge here creating the new discipline – neuromacroecomics.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics? How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, XLIII.
2.Gollwitzer, P.M., Kontaro, F., Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and Implementation of Goals. W: R.F. Baumeister, K.D. Vohs (red.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory and Applications. New York: Guilford Press.
3.Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
4.Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. W: T. Gilovich, D. Griffi n, D. Kahneman (red.), Heuristic of Intuitive Judgment: Extentions and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.Kirkpatrick, L.A., Epstein, E. (1992). Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory and Subjective Probability; Further Evidence for Two Conceptual Systems. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology, 63 (4).
6.Lieberman, M.D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D.T., Trope, Y. (2002). Refl ection and Refl exion: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Attributional Interference. W: M.P. Zanna (red.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
7.Schneider, W., Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: I. Detection, Search and Attention. Psychological Review, 84 (1).
8.Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.(2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23.
9.Supernat, J. (20016). Grupowe podejmowanie decyzji. Pobrane z: supernat.pl/wykłady/plk/i_33_2_Grupowe_podejmowanie_decyzji_doc (10.08.2016).