Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ


ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2016.45/1-26
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 45/1 2016
Realizacja krajowego programu zwiększania lesistości w kontekście struktury własności gruntów
(Implementation of the national afforestation programme rate in the context of land ownership structure)

Authors: Jan Kazak
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu

Szymon Szewrański
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu

Małgorzata Świąder
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu
Keywords: National Afforestation Program forestation the structure of land ownership
Data publikacji całości:2016
Page range:14 (329-342)
Klasyfikacja JEL: Q23 Q28 R58
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The reason to undertake research topic are problems with the implementation of the National Afforestation Programme (KPZL). More than twenty years of its implementation shows the diverse nature of obstacles. Aspect considered in this paper is the relation between the structure of land ownership and implementation of the KPZL. The study analyzed also the spatial differences between the regions in the implementation of the KPZL.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Brogna, D., Vincke, C., Brostaux, Y., Soyeurt, H., Dufrêne, M., Dendoncker, N. (2017). How Does Forest Cover Impact Water Flows and Ecosystem Services? Insights from “Real- -life” Catchments in Wallonia (Belgium). Ecological Indicators, 72, 675–685.
2.Cao, S., Zhang, J., Chen, L., Zhao, T. (2016). Ecosystem Water Imbalances Created during Ecological Restoration by Afforestation in China, and Lessons for Other Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 183 (3), 843–849.
3.Cintas, O., Berndes, G., Hansson, J., Chandra Poudel, B., Bergh, J., Börjesson, P., Egnell, G., Lundmark, T., Nordin, A. (2017). The Potential Role of Forest Management in Swedish Scenarios Towards Climate Neutrality by Mid Century. Forest Ecology and Management, 383, 73–84
4.Han, X., Zhao, F., Tong, X., Deng, J., Yang, G., Chen, L., Kang, D. (2017). Understanding Soil Carbon Sequestration Following the Afforestation of Former Arable Land by Physical Fractionation. CATENA, 150, 317–327.
5.Helman, D., Osem, Y., Yakir, D., Lensky, I.M. (2017). Relationships between Climate, Topography, Water Use and Productivity in Two Key Mediterranean Forest Types with Different Water-use Strategies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 232, 319–330
6.Informacja o realizacji „Krajowego programu zwiększania lesistości” w 2009 r. Pobrane z: http://bip.lasy.gov.pl/pl/bip/px_~inform_o_realizacji_kpzl_w_2009.pdf (15.05.2016).
7.Kazak, J., Malczyk, J., Garcia Castro, D., Szewrański, S. (2016). Carbon Sequestration in Forest Valuation. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 24 (1), 76–86.
8.Malczyk, J., Świeżak, J. (2008). Krajowy program zwiększania lesistości w systemie lokalnego planowania przestrzennego w Polsce. Studia i Materiały Centrum Edukacji Przyrodniczo-Leśnej, 10, 3 (19), 291–301.
9.Ministerstwo Środowiska (2003). Krajowy Program Zwiększania Lesistości. Aktualizacja 2003 r.
10.Ministerstwo Środowiska (2014). Aktualizacja Krajowego Programu Zwiększania Lesistości 2014.
11.Raum, S., Potter, C. (2015). Forestry Paradigms and Policy Change: The Evolution of Forestry Policy in Britain in Relation to the Ecosystem Approach. Land Use Policy, 49, 462–470.
12.Thiele, J.C., Nuske, R.S., Ahrends, B., Panferov, O., Albert, M., Staupendahl, K., Junghans, U., Jansen, M., Saborowski, J. (2017). Climate Change Impact Assessment – A Simulation Experiment with Norway Spruce for a Forest District in Central Europe. Ecological Modelling, 346, 30–47.
13.Ustawa z 28.09.1991 o lasach. Dz.U. nr 101, poz. 444, z późn. zm.