Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2016.46/1-11
CC BY-SA   Open Access   CEEOL

Issue archive / nr 46/1 2016
ZRÓŻNICOWANIE GOSPODARCZE KRAJÓW ASEAN – KONWERGENCJA CZY POLARYZACJA?
(Economic diversification of asean countries: convergence or polarization?)

Authors: Michał Scheibe
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: ASEAN integration economic development convergence
Data publikacji całości:2016
Page range:16 (141-156)
Klasyfikacja JEL: F53 F15 O11 O57
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of this article is to assess the level of economic diversification of ASEAN countries in the period 2000–2014. To determine the level of diversification of the concerned economies, the method of statistical analysis in the form of classic measures of variability of selected macroeconomic indicators has been conducted. The study shows that despite high growth in the least developed countries of Southeast Asia and acceleration of integration, economic diversification of ASEAN countries remained at a high level throughout the whole period 2000–2014.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.ASEAN (2016). Pobrano z: http://asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview/ (25.05.2016).
2.Chowdhary, R., Jore, S., Thakur, R., Agrawal, K., Geete, V. (2011). Convergence of GDP per capita in ASEAN Countries. Prestige International Journal of Management and Research, Vol.4, No. 1.
3.Das, R.U. (2009). Imperatives of Regional Economic Integration in Asia in the Context of Developmental Asymmetries: Some Policy Suggestions. ADBI Working Paper, No. 172.
4.Dąbkowski, A. (2015). ASEAN Economic Community – AEC – oczekiwania i rzeczywistość. Pobrano z: http://www.polska-azja.pl/2015/12/01/a-dabkowski-asean-economic-community-aec-oczekiwania-i-rzeczywistosc/ (20.05.2016).
5.Hill, H., Menon, J. (2010). ASEAN Economic Integration: Features, Fulfillments, Failures and the Future. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 69.
6.Islam, N. (2003). What have we learnt from the convergence debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, No. 17 (3),
7.Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R. (2008). International Trade and Regional Income Convergence: The ASEAN-5 Evidence. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, No. 2 (25).
8.Karras, G. (1997). Economic Integration and Convergence: Lessons from Asia, Europe and Latin America. Journal of Economic Integration, No. 4 (12).
9.Markowska-Przybyła, U. (2011). Integracja a konwergencja realna. Konwergencja regionalna w Polsce według klasycznych i alternatywnych metod badań. Ekonomia, nr 4(16).
10.McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) (2014). Southeast Asia at the Crossroads: Three Paths to Prosperity. Pobrano z: www.mckinsey.com/mgi (20.0.2016).
11.Menon, J. (2012). Narrowing the Development Divide in ASEAN: The Role of Policy. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 100.
12.OECD (2014). Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2014: Beyond the Middle-Income Trap. Pobrano z: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/saeo-2014-en (30.05.2016).
13.Pietrasiak, M. (2008). ASEAN-6 I ASEAN-4: Problemy na drodze do integracji regionu Azji Południowo-Wschodniej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 13.
14.World Bank ( 2016b). Pobrano z: http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings (25.05.2016).
15.World Bank (2016a). Pobrano z: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx (25.05.2016).
16.UNCTAD (2016). Pobrano z: https:// www. imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2008/08-17.pdf (25.05.2016).