Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

ISSN: 2450-7733     eISSN: 2300-4096    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sip.2016.43/2-09
CC BY-SA   Open Access   CEEOL

Issue archive / nr 43/2 2016
MOŻLIWOŚCI KSZTAŁTOWANIA ZAANGAŻOWANIA KONSUMENTÓW WOBEC MARKI W MEDIACH SPOŁECZNOŚCIOWYCH ZA POMOCĄ HUMORU
(Building brand engagement in social media by means of humor)

Authors: Małgorzata Karpińska-Krakowiak
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Keywords: building brands in social media humor social media consumer engagement
Data publikacji całości:2016
Page range:10 (95-104)
Klasyfikacja JEL: M30 D10
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Building consumer engagement is one of the most frequently formulated branding objectives in social media and humor is one of the most popular techniques to create an emotional bond between a brand and its buyers. An experimental design was applied to examine the effectiveness of humor in building consumer engagement. The results show that humor can only influence basic cognitive and affective components of engagement, while having no effect on its behavioral dimensions.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Chattopadhyay, A., Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 466–476.
2.Gelb, B.D., Zinkhan, G.M. (1986). Humor and advertising effectiveness after repeated exposures to a radio commercial. Journal of Advertising, 15, 15–20.
3.Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S, Brodie, R.J. (2014). Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (2), 149–165.
4.Krishnan, H.S., Chakravarti, D. (2003). A process analysis of the effects of humorous advertising executions on brand claims memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 230–245.
5.Patterson, P., Yu T., de Ruyter, K. (2006). Understanding customer engagement in services. Pobrane z: http://www.anzmac.org/conference_archive/2006/documents/Pattinson_Paul.pdf.
6.Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–194.
7.Scott, C., Klein, D.M., Bryant, J. (1990). Consumer response to humor advertising: A series of field studies using behavioral observation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 498–501.
8.Speck, P.S. (1987). On humor and humor in advertising [ rozprawa doktorska], Texas Tech University. Pobrane z: https://repositories.tdl.org/ttu-ir/bitstream/handle/2346/19016/31295000275114.pdf? se-quence=1.
9.Stewart, D.M., Furse, D.H. (1986). Effective television advertising. Chicago: D.C. Heath and Company.
10.Strick, M., Holland, R.W., Van Baaren, R., Van Knippenberg, A., Dijksterhuis, A. (2013). Humour in advertising: An associative processing model. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 32–69.
11.Strick, M., Holland, R.W., Van Baaren, R., Van Knippenberg, A. (2012). Those Who Laugh Are Defenseless: How Humor Breaks Resistance to Influence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18 (2), 213–223.
12.Unger, L.S. (1995). Observations: a cross-cultural study on the affect-based model of humor in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (1), 66–71.
13.Weinberger, M.G., Campbell, L. (1991). The use and impact of humor in radio advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 44–52.
14.Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23 (4), 59–70.
15.Zhang, Y., Zinkhan, G.M. (2006). Responses to humorous ads: Does audience involvement matter? Journal of Advertising, 35, 113–127.
16.Zillmann, D., Cantor, J.R. (1996). A disposition theory of humor and mirth (s. 93–116). W: A. Chapman, H.C. Foot (red), Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Wiley and Sons.