Rocznik Komparatystyczny


ISSN: 2081-8718     eISSN: 2353-2831    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/rk.2019.10-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   ERIH PLUS

Lista wydań / 10 (2019)
Soft Subversion, Hard Exposition: Instrumental Sympathy and the Unattainable Multicultural Assemblage in M. Butterfly

Autorzy: Dong Yang
University of Georgia, USA
Słowa kluczowe: literatura porównawcza wielokulturowość miękkość sympatia instrumentalna afekt asamblaż literatura azjatycko-amerykańska
Data publikacji całości:2019
Liczba stron:18 (51-68)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

This essay questions the possibility and validity of multiculturalism by referring to the diagnosis and exposition of instrumental sympathy – a modern affect with an orientalist inclination in disguise – brought up in David Henry Hwang’s masterpiece M. Butterfly. Multiculturalism remains frail and unachievable when the appreciation of an exotic culture is designed to fulfill a desire for appropriation. I also recognize Song’s soft strategy as an effective means to expose the racist will to dominate and subjugate – powered by the hazardous instrumental sympathy – in contemporary multicultural discourse and practice. More than a fictional attraction, the innovation in the exploration of softness makes Song an ideal philosopher that Deleuze and Guattari have sought to call forth to create new assemblages that do not prioritize racial and cultural power. The attainability of multiculturalism, therefore, depends on the degree of nearness to the state of assemblage, in which the mutual recognition of the culturally other, without pre-established prejudices, and mutual respect takes place for the sake of respect.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.
2.Bogue, Ronald. Thinking with Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.
3.Delanda, Manuel. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
4.Deleuze, Gilles. Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature. Trans. Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
5.------. Pure Immanence: Essays on A Life. Trans. Anne Boyman. New York: Zone Books, 2002.
6.Deleuze, Gilles, Félix Guattari. What Is Philosophy? Trans. Hugh Tomlinson, Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
7.Deleuze, Gilles, Claire Parnet. Dialogues II. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson, Barbara Habberjam. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
8.Eng, David. Racial Castration: Managing Masculinity in Asian America. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.
9.Figueira, Dorothy. Otherwise Occupied: Pedagogies of Alterity and the Brahminization of Theory. Albany: SUNY Press, 2008.
10.------. “How Have We Rebuilt the Profession?”. Rebuilding the Profession: Comparative Literature, Intercultural Studies, and the Humanities in the Age of Globalization. Ed. Dorothy Figueira. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2020. 15–32.
11.Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double-Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
12.Holland, Sharon Patricia. The Erotic Life of Racism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.
13.Horkheimer, Max. Critique of Instrumental Reason. Trans. Matthew O’Connell. London: Verso, 2012.
14.Hwang, David Henry. M. Butterfly. New York: Plume, 1993.
15.Luo, Michael. “An Open Letter to the Woman Who Told My Family to Go Back to China.” New York Times, Oct. 9, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/10/nyregion/to-the-woman-who-told-my-family-to-go-back-to-china.html.
16.Ngai, Sianne. Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
17.Patton, Paul. Deleuzian Concepts: Philosophy, Colonization, Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
18.Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 2003.
19.Salecl, Reneta. (Per)versions of Love and Hate. London: Verso, 2000.
20.Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition.” Multiculturalism. Ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
21.Touraine, Alain. Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference. Cambridge: Polity, 2000.