Problemy Transportu i Logistyki

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Problemy Transportu i Logistyki

ISSN: 1644-275X     eISSN: 2353-3005    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ptl.2017.37-35
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / nr 1 (37) 2017
Koncepcja hipotetycznej umowy jako podstawy odpowiedzialności przewoźnika w konwencjach przewozowych
(THE CONCEPT OF HYPOTHETICAL CONTRACT AS THE BASIS OF THE CARIER’S LIABILITY IN THE CONVENTIONS OF CARRIAGE)

Authors: Krzysztof Wesołowski
Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomiki Usług, Uniwersytet Szczeciński

Daniel Dąbrowski
Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomiki Usług, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: multimodal transport piggyback transport Rotterdam Rules CMR Convention carrier’s liability contract of carriage
Year of publication:2017
Page range:11 (273-283)
Klasyfikacja JEL: K12 L91
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the structure used in the CMR Convention and Rotterdam Rules, which involves reference to the hypothetical contract of carriage to determine the proper liability regime of the carrier who uses more than one mode of transport. The authors conclude that the provisions creating this structure are essentially a kind of conflict of law rules. The need for using such an original structure is the effect of the multiplicity of modes of transport and multiplicity of regulations governing the transport contract in these modes of transport.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Basedow, J. (1997). Übereinkommen internationaler Straßenverkehr. W: Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, t. 7. München: Beck.
2.Bombeeck, M., Hamer, P., Verhaegen, B. (1990). La responsabilite du transporteur routier dans le transport par carferries: l’article 2 de la convention relative au contrat de transport international de marchandises par route (CMR). European Transport Law, 25, 110–171.
3.Clarke, M.A. (2014). International carriage of goods by road: CMR (6th ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Informa Law from Routledge.
4.Czapski, W. (1990). Responsabilité du transporteur routière lors du transroulage et du ferroutage. European Transport Law, 25, 172–193.
5.Czepelak, M. (2008). Umowa międzynarodowa jako źródło prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business.
6.Dragun-Gertner, M. (2008). Zakres stosowania prawnego reżimu przewozu ładunku morzem według projektu konwencji Uncitral. Prawo Morskie, 24.
7.Eftestøl-Wilhelmsson, E. (2010). The Rotterdam Rules in a European multimodal context. The Journal of International Maritime Law, 16, 274–288.
8.Glass, D.A. (2013). Freight forwarding and multimodal transport contracts (2nd ed). London: Informa.
9.Haak, K.F. (1986). The liability of the carrier under the CMR: (with summaries in French and German). The Hague: Stichting Vervoeradres.
10.Hill, D.J., Messent, A.D. (1984). CMR, contracts for the international carriage of goods by road. London: Lloyd’s of London Press, Legal Pub. & Conferences Division.
11.Hoeks, M. (2010). Multimodal transport law: the law applicable to the multimodal contract for the carriage of goods. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands : Frederick, MD: Kluwer Law International; Sold and distributed in North, Central, and South America by Aspen Publishers.
12.Krężel, P. (2011). Unifikacja europejskiego prawa transportowego a reguły rotterdamskie. Prawo Morskie, 27, 147–154.
13.Kwaśniewski, Z. (1989). Umowa multimodalnego przewozu towarów w obrocie międzynarodowym. Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.
14.Loewe, R. (1976). Note explicative sur la Convention au contrat de transport international de marchandises par router. European Transport Law, 503–597.
15.Lojda, J. (2015). The Impact of CMR on Multimodal Transport. Czech Yearbook of International Law, VI, 149–168.
16.Ramberg, J. (1987). Deviation from the Legal Regime of the CMR (art. 2). W: J. Theunis (red.), International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR). London–New York–Hamburg–Hong Kong.
17.Sturley, M.F., Fujita, T., Ziel, G.J. van der (2010). The Rotterdam Rules: the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea. London: Thomson Reuters.
18.Theunis, J. (1987). The liability of a carrier by road in roll on, roll off traffic. W: J. Theunis (red.), International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR). London–New York–Hamburg–Hong Kong.
19.Wesołowski, K. (2013). Umowa międzynarodowego przewozu drogowego towarów na podstawie CMR. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
20.Ziegler, A. von, Schelin, J., Zunarelli, S. (red.). (2010). The Rotterdam Rules 2008: commentary to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea. Alphen aan den Rijn: Frederick, MD: Kluwer Law International ; Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by Aspen Publishers.