Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-22
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 4/2016
Szacowanie kosztu kapitału własnego spółek górniczych z zastosowaniem modelu D-CAPM
(Estimating the Cost of Equity for Mining Companies Using D-CAPM Model)

Authors: Robert Ranosz

Barbara Kowal
Keywords: cost of capital mining downside beta D-CAPM
Data publikacji całości:2016
Page range:8 (271-278)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

This article is devoted to estimating the cost of equity using the model D-CAPM. The aim of the article is to present the said methods and presentation of sample calculated for selected mining companies and mining sector (WIG-raw). Article consists of four parts. In the introduction to the article specified the purpose of the work. In the second part of the development shows the methodology for estimating the cost of equity using method D-CAPM. The General form of the model is almost the same as the generic method IE. CAPM. The main difference between presented method from classical CAPM is a way of calculating the beta factor. In the case of the CAPM is calculated on the basis of the variance, and the D-CAPM is calculated on the basis of semivariance. It is assumed that when we are dealing with normal (symmetric) distribution of rates of return then it is using the traditional CAPM model, where the distribution of rates of return is asymmetrical if legitimate is the use of D-CAPM. It is suggested that the model used in situations when the distribution of rates of return was unbalanced downside. It must be stressed, however, that the choice of the method mainly depends on the investor and his penchant for risk. Another chapter is devoted to examples of calculated estimation of the cost of equity capital for selected Polish mining companies and the mining sector by using the CAPM, and D-CAPM. As a result of the study found that out of selected mining companies only, however, is characterized by a normal distribution of rates of return, and in her case, the cost of equity (risk) can be taken at a lower level. It was also noted that just but the company shows the distribution of asymmetrical downside. The final chapter provides a summary of this study. The whole article closes the list of the literature.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Brigham E.F., Gapenski L.C. (2000). Zarządzanie finansami 1. Warszawa: PWE.
2.Brigham E.F., Houston J.F. (2005). Podstawy zarządzania finansami. Warszawa: PWE.
3.Cwynar A., Dżurak P. (2010). Systemy VBM i zysk ekonomiczny. Warszawa: Poltex.
4.Czyż M. (2013). Szacowanie kosztu kapitału własnego metodą stopy dochodu z obligacji z premią za ryzyko. Pobrano z: http://jmf.wzr.pl/pim/2013_2_2_5.pdf.
5.Estrada J., Serra A. (2005). Risk and return in emerging markets: family matters. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 15, 257–272.
6.Galagedra U.A., Brooks R.D. (2007). Is Co-Skewness a Better Measure of Risk in the Downside That Downside Beta? Evidence in Emerging Market Data. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 17, 214–230.
7.Kordlouie H., Haftlang N.B., Dehghani A. (2012). D-CAPM and RD-CAPM in Return Anticipation at Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 7 (11), 87–94.
8.Luenberger D.G. (2003). Teoria inwestycji finansowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
9.Michalik A. (2014). Klasyczne a innowacyjne metody szacowania kosztu kapitału własnego przedsiębiorstwa. Studia Ekonomiczne, 186 (cz. 2), 27–37.
10.Reilly F.K., Brown K.C. (2001). Analiza inwestycji i zarządzanie portfelem. Warszawa: PWE.