ISSN: 2450-7741
eISSN: 2300-4460
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-21
Issue archive /
4/2016
Zmiana zarządzającego a wyniki finansowe spółki – przegląd wybranych badań
(Managerial Change and Company Operating Performance – the Review of Research Results)
| Authors: | Agnieszka Preś-Perepeczo |
| Keywords: | CEO change succession operating performance |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2016 |
| Page range: | 10 (261-270) |
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of the article was to review research results of the relation between CEO succession and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – The literature study related to the CEO succession and operating performance before and after the event in developed markets was performed. Findings – Results of literature study in the developed markets indicate that an decrease in operating performance is observed before the CEO change. The CEO succession is followed by an increase in operating performance, especially in the case of forced changes. An external CEO operates more effectively in comparison to an internal one. Research result how the gender of CEO could impact company performance are not clear. Originality/value – There is a literature gap addressing CEO changes and operating as well market performance in the Polish capital market. The literature review and observations made in developed markets are the basis for the application and exploration of similar correlations among the Polish public companies
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Bohdanowicz L. (2010). Wpływ liczebności rad nadzorczych i zarządów spółek publicznych na wyniki spółek. Master of Business Administration, 3, 18–30. |
| 2. | Böhren O., Ström R.O. (2007). Aligned, informed, and decisive: Characteristics of value-creating boards. EFA Ljubljana Meetings Paper. Pobrano z: http://ssrn.com /abstract=966407 (25.02.2016). |
| 3. | Campbell K., Vera A.M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: short and long-term effects. Journal of Management & Governance, 14 (1), 37–59. |
| 4. | Carter D.A., Simkins B.J., Simpson W.G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53. |
| 5. | Davidson III W.N., Tong S., Worrell D.L., Rowe W. (2006). Ignoring rules of succession: How the board reacts to CEO illness announcements. Journal of Business Strategies, 23 (2). |
| 6. | Denis D.J., Denis D.K. (1995). Performance Changes Following Top Management Dismissals. The Journal of Finance, 1 (4), 1029–1057. |
| 7. | Erhardt N.L., Werbel J.D., Shrader C.B. (2003). Board of director’s diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111. |
| 8. | Farrell K.A., Hersch P.L. (2001). Additions to Corporate Boards: Does Gender Matter? Pobrano z: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292281 (25.02.2016). |
| 9. | Gangloff K.A., Connelly B.L., Shook C.L. (2014). Of Scapegoats and Signals Investor Reactions to CEO Succession in the Aftermath of Wrongdoing. Journal of Management. Pobrano z: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515521 (25.02.2016). |
| 10. | Gurgul H., Majdosz P. (2007). Stock price and resignation of members of the board: The case of the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Managing Global Transitions, 5 (2), 179–192. |
| 11. | Huson M.R., Malatesta P.H., Parrino R. (2004). Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 237–257. |
| 12. | Jehn K.A., Bezrukova K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, group context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Special Issue: Diversity and the Workplace, 25 (6), 703–729. Pobrano z: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.004. |
| 13. | Kaiser R.B., Hogan R., Craig S.B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. The American Psychologist, 63, 96–110. |
| 14. | Smith N., Smith V., Verner M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593. |