Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.89/2-22
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 5/2017
Analiza odchyleń wycen przedsiębiorstw w rekomendacjach maklerskich. Nadmierny optymizm
(ANALYSIS OF DEVIATIONS VALUATIONS OF COMPANIES IN THE BROKERAGE RECOMMENDATIONS. EXCESSIVE OPTIMISM)

Authors: Radosław Pastusiak
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Keywords: excessive optimism the valuation of the company heuristics
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:8 (299-306)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The main aim of the article is an attempt to show the phenomenon of excessive optimism on capital market on the example of recommendations provided by the Brokerage Houses in Poland. The structure of recommendations indicates that there is more positive recommendations than negative and neutral ones. It would be reasonable statistically in constant market growth conditions, meanwhile, stock market is characterized by bull, bear and horizontal trend periods. The question is, why then, in the changing conjuncture there outweigh of the positive recommendation over the negative and neutral ones is observed. To achieve the research aim, the companies from Warsaw Stock Exchange were selected and recommendation describing them were compared. Research results indicate that positive recommendations are dominant. The next stage was to compare the stock quotation at recommendation issue date with the price achieved by the company a year after. Research results indicate that despite positive and negative recommendations of Brokerage Houses, significant number of recommendations have overestimated the price in relation to real value achieved by the particular company on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Eames, M., Glover, S.M., Kennedy, J. (2002). The Association between Trading Recommendations and Broker-Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 85–104.
2.Montier, J. (2007). Behavioural Investing: A Practitioners Guide to Applying Behavioural Finance. Chichester: Wiley.
3.Nęcka, E, Orzechowski, J. Szymura, B. (2008). Psychologia poznawcza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
4.Olsen, R. (1997). Investment Risk: The Experts’ Perspective. Financial Analysts’ Journal, 53, 62–66.
5.Olsen, R., Throughton, G.H. (2000). Are Risk Premium Anomalies Caused by Ambiguity. Financial Analysts Journal, 56, 24–31.
6.Pompian, M.M. (2006). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build optimal portfolios that account for investor biases. John Wiley and Sons.
7.Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.Szyszka, A. (2009). Behawioralne aspekty kryzysu finansowego. Bank i Kredyt, 4 (4), 5–30.
9.Törngren, G., Montgomery, H. (2004). Worse than chance? Performance and confidence among professionals and laypeople in the stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5, 148–153.
10.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 2 (76), 105–110.
11.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Since, 185, 1124–1131.
12.Tyszka, T. Zielonka, P. (2002). Expert judgments: Financial analysts versus weather forecasters. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 3 (3), 152–160.
13.Wąsowska, A. (2013). Heurystyki i błędy poznawcze jako źródła niepowodzenia audytu zewnętrznego. Problemy Zarządzania, 3 (11), 189–202.
14.Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2015). Psychologia ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
15.Zielonka, P. (2014). Giełda i psychologia. Behawioralne aspekty inwestowania na rynku papierów wartościowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
16.Zweig, J. (2009). How to Ignore the Yes-Man in Your Head. Dow Jones & Company, 19.11.2009 (8.05.2016).