Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.79-63
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 1/2016 (79)
Wskaźniki efektywności w badaniach nad zaufaniem międzyorganizacyjnym
(Performance Indicators Application in the Research of Interorganizational Trust)

Authors: Krzysztof Łobos

Karolina Mazur
Keywords: performance interorganizational trust social research
Year of publication:2016
Page range:9 (809-817)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this study is to assess the application possibilities, reliability and threats of performance measures which can be used in the research on the interorganizational trust outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – The partial method of systematic review of literature has been applied in the research. The authors reviewed 17 studies included 31 measurements of performance trust outcomes. Findings – The authors assessed that process performance measures have the highest applicability in the research on interorganizational trust outcomes. The analysis also gave a conclusion that there is a highest applicability of Likert scale than of primary financial data. Originality/value – The work consists of summary of the research methodologies of other authors. The evaluation of research tools, which use performance measurements can be a basis for future research standards in this area. It also can be a contribution to analysis tools creation in area of intellectual capital.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Aulakh, P.S., Kotabe M., Sahay A. (1996), Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral
2.Approach, „Journal of International Business Studies, Global Perspektives on Cooperative Strategies”
3.vol. 27, no. 5, s. 1005–1032.
4.Cheng J-H., Yeh Ch-H., Tu Ch-W. (2008), Trust and knowledge sparing in green supply chains, „Supply Chain
5.Management: An Internatinol Journal” vol.13, no. 4, s. 283–295.
6.Claro P.C., Hagelaar. G., Omta O. (2003), The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to
7.manage business relationships?, „Industrial Marketing Management” vol. 32, no. 8, s, 703–716.
8.Czakon W. (2015), Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury, w: W. Czakon, Podstawy metodologii badań
9.w naukach o zarządzaniu, Oficyna Wolters-Kluwer Business, Warszawa, s. 119–139.
10.Fang E., Palmatier R.W., Scheer L.K., Li N., (2008), Trust at Different Organizational Levels, „Journal of Marketing”
11.vol. 72, no. 1, s. 80–98.
12.Gondek A., Mazur K. (2015), Metodyka metaanalizy w naukach o zarządzaniu, w: W. Czakon, Podstawy metodologii
13.badań w naukach o zarządzaniu, Oficyna Wolters-Kluwer Business, Warszawa, s. 140–166.
14.Gulati R., Nickerson J.A. (2008), Interorganizational Trust, Governance Choice, and Exchange Performance, „Organization
15.Science” vol. 19, no. 5, s. 688–708.
16.Guilford J.P. (1965), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, McGraw-Hill, New York.
17.Heide J.B. (1994), Interorganizational governance in marketing channels, „Journal of Marketing” vol. 58, no 1,
18.s. 71–85.
19.Hult G.T.M. Ketchen D.J., Griffith D.A., Chabowski B.R., Hamman M.K., Dykes B.J., Pollite W.A., Cauvasgil S.T.
20.(2008), An Assessment of the Measurement of Performance in International Business Research, „Journal of
21.International Business Studies” vol. 39, no. 6, s. 1064–1080.
22.Johnson J.L., Cullen J.B., Sakano T., Takenouchi H. (1996), Setting the Stage for Trust and Strategic Integration in
23.Japanese–U.S. Cooperative Alliances, „Journal of International Business Studies” vol. 27, no. 5, s. 981–1004.
24.Johnson D., Grayson H. (2005), Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships, „Journal of Business Research”
25.vol. 58, no. 2, s. 500–507.
26.Krishnan R., Martin X., Noorderhaven N.G. (2006), When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance?, „Academy
27.of Management Journal” vol. 49, no. 5, s. 894–917.
28.Lado A., Dant R., Tekleab A. (2008), Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships:
29.evidence from the retail industry, „Strategic Management Journal” vol. 29, no. 4, s. 401–423.
30.Leonidou L.C., Samiee S., Aykol B., Talias M.A. (2014), Antecedents and Outcomes of Exporter–Importer Relationship
31.Quality: Synthesis, Meta-Analysis, and Directions for Further Research, „Journal of International Marketing”
32.vol. 22, no. 2, s. 21–46.
33.Liao T.J. (2010), Cluster and performance in foreign firms: The role of resources, knowledge, and trust, „Industrial
34.Marketing Management” vol. 39, no. 1, s. 161–169.
35.Łobos K. (2009), Operational effectiveness – an evaluation method, „Management” vol. 13, no. 2, s. 7–14.
36.McAllister D.J. (1995), Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,
37.„The Academy of Management Journal” vol. 38, no. 1, s. 24–59.
38.Negandhi A.R. (1975), Organization Theory In an Open System: A Study of Transferring Advanced Management
39.Practices to Developing Nations, Dunellen Publishing, New York.
40.Nes E.B., Solberg A.B., Silkoset R. (2007), The impact of national culture and communication on exporter–distributor
41.relations and on export performance, „International Business Review” vol. 16, no. 4, s. 405–424.
42.Nie R., Zhong W., Zhou M., Jiang W., Wang X. (2011), A bittersweet phenomenon: The internal structure, functional
43.mechanism, and effect of guanxi on firm performance, „Industrial Marketing Management” vol. 40, no. 4,
44.s. 540–549.
45.Qui C., Chau P.Y.K. (2013), Investigating the roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust in IT outsourcing
46.success, „Information Technology & People” vol. 26, no. 4, s. 120–145.
47.Robson M.J., Katsikeas C.S., Bello D.C. (2008), Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International
48.Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity, „Organization Science” vol. 19, no. 4, s. 647–665.
49.Sankowska A. (2015), Analiza zaufania w sieciach badawczo-rozwojowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
50.Sztompka P. (2007), Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa, Znak, Kraków.
51.Thorgren S., Örtqvist D., Wincent J. (2009), A Cause-effect Study of Inter-firm Networking and Corporate Entrepreneurship:
52.Initial Evidence of Self-Enforcing Spirals, „Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship” vol. 14,
53.no. 4, s. 355–373.
54.Williamson O.E. (1993), Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization, „Journal of Law and Economics”
55.vol. 36, no. 1, s. 453–486.
56.Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. (1998), Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and
57.Interpersonal Trust on Performance, „Organization Science” vol. 9, no. 2, s. 141–159.