Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.88/2-14
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 4/2017
Importance of funding sources to the scale of activity of social enterprises

Authors: Paweł Mikołajczak
Katedra Pieniądza i Bankowości
Keywords: social enterprises; NGOs; economisation sources of funding
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:10 (135-144)
Klasyfikacja JEL: M14 L31
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

In the past few decades the sector of non-governmental organisations undergone significant changes. Those changes consist in adaptation of business behaviour which bases on stability of NGOs’ financing and possibility to realise the social mission more efficiently. This process is mostly described as economisation of non-profit organisations and it arouses a lot of controversy among numerous researchers. It became an incentive of development for non-governmental organisations as those entities which run a business not for profit but to fulfil goals in social domain. The realisation of those goals, apart from paid activity, requires numerous support sources which determine the scale of a social effect. Purpose – The aim of the paper is a comparative analysis of the influence of funding sources on the scale of activity of NGOs running a business (ie. social enterprises) and NGOs not running such an activity. Design/methodology/approach – ANOVA analysis and ranking method were used to achieve this goal. Following regressive methods were also used: step regression, interactive trees (Classification and Regression Trees - C&RT), reinforced trees, MARSplines and neural networks. Findings – The scale of activity of social enterprises (NGOs running a commercial sale of goods and services) is statistically significantly higher than of non-profit ones. Non-governmental organisations also demonstrate a bigger involvement in use of private resources. The main source of revenues, determining the scale of business of profit-oriented and non-profit NGOs, are European funds. Originality/value – The paper can significantly contribute to international discussion on effects of economisation of non-profit organisations which is understood as a commercial sale of goods and services. This contribution is due to a small number of studies based on empirical research which show a real influence of financing sources on the activity scale of social enterprises.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Brandstetter, L., Lehner, O. M. (2014). Impact Investment Portfolios: Including Social Risks and Returns. Oxford, UK: ACRN, Oxford Publishing House.
2.Çalışkan, K., Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society, 38 (3), 369–398.
3.Carmin, J. (2010). NGO Capacity and Environmental Governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica, 45 (1–2), 183–202.
4.Carroll, D.A., Stater, K.J. (2009). Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does it Lead to Financial Stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (4), 947–966.
5.Chang, C.F., Tuckman, H.P. (1994). Revenue Diversification among Nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5 (3), 273–290.
6.Dart, R. (2004a). Being “Business-like” in a Nonprofit Organization: A Grounded and Inductive Typology. Non- -profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 290–310.
7.Dart, R. (2004b). The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 411–424. Dees, J.G. (1998). Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 54–69.
8.Edwards, M., Hulme, D. (1996). Too Close For Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Nongovernmental Organizations, World Development, 24 (6), 961–973.
9.Eikenberry, A.M., Kluver, J.D. (2004). The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk? Public Administration Review, 64 (2), 132–140.
10.Enjolras, B. (2002). The Commercialization of Voluntary Sport Organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31 (3), 352–376.
11.Froelich, K.A. (1999). Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28 (3), 246–268.
12.Geobey, S., Weber, O. (2013). Lessons in Operationalizing Social Finance: The Case of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3 (2), 124–137.
13.Keating, E., Fischer, M., Gordon, T., Greenlee, J. (2005). Assessing Financial Vulnerability in the Nonprofit Sector. Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University Working Paper.
14.Kerlin, J.A., Pollak, T. (2006). Nonprofit Commercial Revenue: A Replacement for Declining Government Grants and Private Contributions? Paper presented at the Third Annual, United Kingdom.
15.Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for Empowerment: Dilemmas Facing Non-governmental Organizations. World Development, 34 (6), 951–963.
16.King, S. (2006). Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy. London: Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press, Kingdom Social Enterprise Research Conference.
17.Maier, F., Meyer, M., Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like a Systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45 (1), 64–86.
18.Martens, K. (2002). Mission Impossible? Defining Nongovernmental Organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13 (3), 271–285.
19.Mikołajczak, P., Czternasty, W. (2015a). Social Enterprises versus Globalisation. Intercathedra, 31 (2), 43–52.
20.Mikołajczak, P., Czternasty, W. (2015b). Wspieranie rozwoju przedsiębiorstw ekonomii społecznej w Polsce przez fundusze europejskie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 116, 420–432.
21.O’Donohoe, N., Leijonhufvud, C., Saltuk, Y., Bugg-Levine, A., Brandenburg, M. (2010). Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class. London: Morgan Global Research.
22.Salamon, L.M. (1987). Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-party Government: The Theory of Government-nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Journal of Voluntary Action & Research, 16, 29–49.
23.Salamon, L.M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government -nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: JHU Press.
24.Salamon, L.M., Hems, L.C., Chinnock, K. (2000). The Non-profit Sector: For What and for Whom? Working Papers of the The Johns Hopkins Comparative Non-profit Sector Project, 37.
25.Simpson, M., Cheney, G. (2007). Marketization, Participation, and Communication within New Zealand Retirement Villages: A Critical-rhetorical and Discursive Analysis. Discourse & Communication, 1, 191–222.
26.Weber, O. (2012). Social Finance and Impact Investing. Retrived from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2160403 (20.03.2017).