Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia


ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.88/1-47
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 4/2017
Jakość w badaniach interpretatywnych rachunkowości zarządczej
(QUALITY IN INTERPRETATIVE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH)

Authors: Bożena Nadolna
Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: quality of interpretative research managerial accounting strategies for improving research quality methodology
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:11 (487-497)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this article is to evaluate the methodology of a selected management accounting research project using a speci c strategy to improve the quality of interpretative research. Design/methodology/approach – The article was written on the basis of literature. A method of analysis of the sources was applied. Findings – The article presents factors and instruments increasing the quality of the interpretative studies and evaluates the research strategy of selected management accounting. Originality/value – In polish literature there are no publications discussing the identi cation of the determinants of reliability of interpretative studies and instruments for increasing their quality in management accounting.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Ahrens, T. (2008). Overcoming the Subjective–Objective Divide in Interpretive Management Accounting Research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33 (2–3), 292–297.
2.Ahrens, T., Chapman, Ch.S. (2007). Management Accounting as Practice. Accounting, Organization and Society, 32, 1–27.
3.Bohnsack, R. (2004). Group Discussion an Focus Groups. W: U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke (red), A Companion to Qualitative Research (s. 214–220). London: Sage.
4.Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Praktyczny przewodnik po analizie jakościowej. Warszawa: Wydawnic- two Naukowe PWN.
6.Cooper, D.J., Morgan, W. (2008). Case Study Research in Accounting. Accounting Horizons, 22 (2), 159–178. Denzin, N.K. (1970). The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.
7.Flick, U. (2011). Jakość w badaniach jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
8.Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
9.Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
10.Ihantola, E.A., Kihn, L.A. (2011). Threats to Validity and Reliability In Mixed Methods Accounting Research, Qualitative. Research in Accounting and Management, 8 (10), 39–58.
11.Jönsson, S., Grönlund, A. (1988). Life with a Sub-contractor: New Technology and Management Accounting. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 13, 512–532.
12.Kirk, J., Miller, M. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
13.Kostera, M. (1996). Postmodernizm w zarządzaniu. Warszawa: PWE.
14.Miles, M.B., Hubermann, A.M. (2000). Analiza danych jakościowych. Białystok: Trans Humana.
15.Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research. Harvard Educational Review, 62 (3), 279–300.
16.Lukka, K., Modell, S. (2010). Validation in Interpretative Management Accounting Research. Accounting Organizations and Society, 35, 462–477.
17.Nadolna, B. (2011). Wykorzystanie informacji z rachunkowości przy podejmowaniu decyzji operacyjnych w wybranych rmach budowlanych. Studium przypadku. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 181, 411–425.
18.Nadolna, B. (2013). Problemy walidacji badań jakościowych w rachunkowości zarządczej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 291, 381–390.
19.Parker, L.D. (2012). Qualitative Management Accounting Research: Assessing Deliverables and Relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23, 54–70.
20.Richardson, A. (2012). Paradigms, Theory and Management Accounting Practice: A Comment on Parker (Forthcoming) “Qualitative Management Accounting Research: Assessing Deliverables and Relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23, 83–88.
21.Silverman, D. (2007). Interpretacja danych jakościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
22.Steinke, I. (2004). Quality Criteria in Qualitative Research. W: U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke (red), A Companion to Qualitative Research (s. 184–190). London: Sage.