Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

ISSN: 2450-7741     eISSN: 2300-4460    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.86-22
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 2/2017 (86)
Zastosowanie wybranych miar zysków i strat do badania efektywności inwestycyjnej funduszy akcyjnych w latach 2007-2015
(APPLICATION OF SELECTED MEASURES OF GAINS AND LOSSES FOR TESTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INVESTMENT EQUITY FUNDS IN THE YEARS 2007-2015)

Authors: Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska
SGGW w Warszawie
Keywords: Martin ratio gain-loss ratio Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
Data publikacji całości:2017
Page range:10 (263-272)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of the study was to evaluate the investment results achieved by equity funds and their stability. Design/Methodology/approach – In the paper applied measures related to the drawdown ie. gain-loss and Martin indicators. The research involved sixteen equity funds in the period 2007–2015, which was divided into sub-periods of the length of two, three and four years. Also examined the stability of the rankings of the funds obtained in the each sub-periods using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient if the results of management are able to hold a longer period of time. Findings – The results are mostly unsatisfactory for the investor. They also indicate the lack of leaders in sub-periods of the length of four years. In shorter periods (2-, 3-years) only in one case there is a correlation significantly different from zero. Originality/Value – The work is a continuation of research based largely on the classic indicators, ie. Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen ratios.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Bacon, C. (2008). Practical Performance Measurement and Attribution. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2.Bernardo, A., Ledoit, O. (2000). Gain. Loss and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economics, 108, 144–172.
3.Domański, Cz. (red.) (2011). Nieklasyczne metody oceny efektywności i ryzyka. Warszawa: PWE.
4.Eling, M., Schuhmacher, F. (2007). Does the Choice of Performance Measure Influence the Evaluation of Hedge Funds? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2632–2247.
5.Guse, F., Rudolf, M. (2008). Schiefe in der Portfolio-Selektion. Kredit und Kapital, 41 (2), 197–216.
6.Karpio, A., Żebrowska-Suchodolska, D. (2014). Strata jako podstawa oceny efektywności inwestycyjnej FIO akcji i zrównoważonych. Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych, 15 (3), 99–109.
7.Kazemi, H., Schneeweis, T., Gupta, B. (2004). Omega as a Performance Measure. Journal of Performance Measurement, 8 (3), 16–25.
8.Kooli, M., Morin, F., Sedzro, K. (2005). Evaluation des Mesures de Performance des Hedge Funds. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the French Association of Finance.
9.Luszniewicz A., Słaby T. (2003). Statystyka z pakietem komputerowym STATISTICA PL. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
10.Martin P., McCann, B. (1989). The Investor’s Guide to Fidelity Funds: Winning Strategies for Mutual Fund Investors. London: Wiley.
11.Pruchnicka-Grabias, I. (2015). Zastosowanie miar maksymalnej straty na kapitale w badaniu efektywności funduszy hedgingowych. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego. Studia i Prace. Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 3 (3), 133–145.
12.Shadwick, W., Keating, C. (2002). A universal performance measure. Journal of Performance Measurement, 6 (3), 59–84.
13.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.