European Journal of Service Management

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Service Management

ISSN: 2450-8535     eISSN: 2451-2729     DOI: 10.18276/ejsm.2018.27/2-36
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / Vol. 27/2, 3/2018
The importance of logistics services for the economical efficiency in the garment industry

Autorzy: Dariusz Milewski
University of Szczecin, Faculty of Economics and Management of Services

Beata Milewska
WSB University in Poznań, Faculty of Finance and Banking in Poznań
Słowa kluczowe: global supply chain efficiency of logistics processes logistics costs costs of lost sales garment industry
Rok wydania:2018
Liczba stron:7 (299-305)
Klasyfikacja JEL: L20 L91 M20
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:


The paper deals with the problem of the importance of the performance of logistics processes and services for the economic efficiency of sourcing strategies (local or global) in the garment industry. It presents the results of the research studies conducted by the authors in the Polish companies from the garment industry. Based on the results of the studies the electronic model of a supply chain has been made in order to estimate, what are the structure of the logistics costs what is the share of them in sales. The simulations conducted with the use of the model shown, that in present conditions, the sourcing strategies have strong impact the logistics costs. Yet relatively higher level of logistics costs in global sourcing (from low cost countries) don’t make it less profitable than in sourcing locally. However even small change of purchase costs can make global supply chains unprofitable.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Battistoni, E., Fronzetti Colladon, A., Mercorelli, G. (2013). Prominent determinants of consumer based brand equity. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5 (25), 1–8.
2.Bruce, M., Daly, L., Towers, N. (2004). Lean or agile: A solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2 (24), 151–170.
3.De Carlo, F., Tucci, M., Borgia, O. (2013). Bucket brigades to increase productivity in a luxury assembly line. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 1, 5–28.
4.Establish Davis Database (2018). Retrieved from:
5.Fugate, B.S., Mentzer, J.T., Stank, T.P. (2010). Logistics performance: efficiency, effectiveness, and differentiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 1 (31), 1–43.
6.Inger, B.H., Wiljar, H. (2010). Logistics costs in Norway. Key figures and international comparisons. TØI report 1052, Oslo, 1–112.
7.Retrieved from:
8.Karri, R., Ojala, R. (2012). Measurement of National-Level Logistics Costs and Performance. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper. Retrieved from:
9.Marufuzzaman, M., Ahsan, K.B., Xing, K. (2009). Supplier selection and evaluation method using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): a case study on an apparel manufacturing organization. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 3 (2), 224–240.
10.McKinsey & Company (2017). The State of Fashion 2017. The Business of Fashion and McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from:
11.National Retail Federation (2015). 2015 Top 250 Global Powers of Retailing. Retrieved from:
12.Nenni, M.E., Giustiniano, L., Pirolo, L. (2013). Demand Forecasting in the Fashion Industry: A Review. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5 (37), 1–6.
13.Rayman, D., Burns, D.J., Nelson, C.N. (2011). Apparel product quality: its nature and measurement. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (1), 66–75.
14.Ślusarczyk, B., Kot, S. (2013). Logistics Costs Identification In SME In Poland. Advanced Logistic Systems, 1 (7), 91–96.
15.Solakivi, T., Ojala, L., Laari, S., Lorentz, H., Töyli, J., Malmsten, J., Viherlehto, N. (2015). Finland State of Logistics 2014. University of Turku. Turku School of Economics, Serie E-1. Retrieved from:
16.Stank, T.P., Goldsby, T.J., Vickery, S.K., Savitskie, K. (2003) Logistics service performance: Estimating its influence on market share. Journal of Business Logistics, 1 (24), 27–55.