European Journal of Service Management

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Service Management

ISSN: 2450-8535     eISSN: 2451-2729     DOI: 10.18276/ejsm.2018.27/2-26
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / Vol. 27/2, 3/2018
Sprout of e-enterprises stimulated by public support

Autorzy: Łukasz Konopielko
Łazarski University, Warsaw

Jacek Wytrębowicz
Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology
Słowa kluczowe: public grants innovative economy e-services valuation public spending effectiveness
Rok wydania:2018
Liczba stron:8 (213-220)
Klasyfikacja JEL: D61 H42 O32 O38
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:


The aim of this paper is to report selected results from an analysis of Internet-based e-services that were created with the support of the EU sponsored Operational Programme for Innovative Economy run by the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (PARP). From 2008 to 2014, PARP allocated funds for the creation of 2,730 enterprises that develop new e-services. Efficiency of this public support is the focus of this paper; however, there exist no simple means to measure and assess it. Analysis takes advantage of different metrics that can be applied to a numerous set of web pages. The main finding of the paper is that the scheme produced a negative value in terms of its effectiveness, thus raising an issue of rationality of public intervention in Internet-based e-services sector. In comparison with other papers dealing with various subsidy schemes, we did not assume a priori that the subsidy outlays would bring positive effect, allowing for unrestricted assessment of the results obtained in the scheme.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Arduini, D., Zanfei, A. (2014). An overview of scholarly research on public e-services? A meta-analysis of the literature. Telecommunications Policy, 38 (5–6), 476–495. Retrieved from:
2.Blanes, J.V., Busom, I. (2004). Who participates in R&D subsidy programs?: The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 33 (10), 1459–1476. Retrieved from:
3.Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size. Organization Studies, 25 (3), 331–361. Retrieved from:
4.Carmichael, J. (1981). The Effects of Mission-Oriented Public R&D Spending on Private Industry. The Journal of Finance, 36 (3), 617–627. Retrieved from:
5.Gneiser, M., Heidemann, J., Klier, M., Landherr, A., Probst, F. (2012). Valuation of online social networks taking into account users’ interconnectedness. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 10 (1), 61–84. Retrieved from:
6.Heijs, J. (2005). Identification of firms supported by technology policies: the case of Spanish low interest credits. Science and Public Policy, 32 (3), 219–230. Retrieved from:
7.Herrera, L., Bravo Ibarra, E.R. (2010). Distribution and effect of R&D subsidies: A comparative analysis according to firm size. Intangible Capital, 6 (2), 272–299. Retrieved from:
8.Hu, L., Zhu, M. (2013). Competitive intelligence acquisition from websites. Proceedings – 2013 10th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD 2013, 858–862. Retrieved from:
9.Lerner, J. (1999). The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the SBIR Program. The Journal of Business, 72 (3), 285–318. Retrieved from:
10.Mchawrab, S., Reims M.S. (2012). Comment estimer la valeur d’un arbre. Gestion 2000, 29 (3), 45–61.
11.Misiąg, J., Misiąg, W., Tomalak, M. (2013). Ocena efektywności wykorzystania pomocy finansowej Unii Europejskiej jako instrumentu polityki spójności społeczno-gospodarczej oraz poprawy warunków życia. Rzeszów: Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania.
12.Moroz, M. (2014). Ocena funkcjonowania działania 8.1 “Wspieranie działalności gospodarczej w dziedzinie gospodarki elektronicznej” Programu Operacyjnego Innowacyjna Gospodarka. Studies & Proceedings Polish Association for Knowledge Management, 71, 117–128.
13.Prorokowski, L. (2014). Is investing in innovation an effective strategy in times of crisis? Some evidence from Poland. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 16 (1), 32–52. Retrieved from:
14.Santamaría, L., Barge-Gil, A., Modrego, A. (2010). Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding. Research Policy, 39 (4), 549–563. Retrieved from: