ISSN: 1731-0555
eISSN: 2353-2998
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/cto.2021.37-07
Issue archive /
37/2021
The role of the epiclesis in transubstantiation
| Authors: |
Jozef
Krupa
Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia |
| Keywords: | epiclesis transubstantiation Eucharist Catechism of the Catholic Church Eastern churches |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2021-12-15 |
| Page range: | 14 (115-128) |
Abstract
The official doctrine of the Catholic Church, contained in the magisterial documents, is still evolving. One recent example is the teaching on who is involved in transubstantiation in the Eucharist. In the Christian West, the words of institution have been emphasized for centuries, while in the Christian East, it has been the epiclesis since the fourth century. Some Catholic theologians explicitly stated that the epiclesis also participates in the conversion of bread and wine, even before the promulgation of this doctrine in the magisterial documents. The doctrinal shift in the Catholic Church regarding the topic of the epiclesis manifested itself in the Catechism of the Catholic Church in number 1105: “The Epiclesis is the intercession in which the priest begs the Father to send the Holy Spirit […], so that the offerings may become the body and blood of Christ.” In number 1353: “In the epiclesis, the Church asks the Father to send his Holy Spirit on the bread and wine, so that by his power they may become the body and blood of Jesus Christ […]. In the institution narrative, the power of the words and the action of Christ, and the power of the Holy Spirit, make sacramentally present under the species of bread and wine Christ’s body and blood, […].” In numbers 1333 and 1357 and also in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal in article 79 c: “The epiclesis, in which, by means of particular invocations, the Church implores the power of the Holy Spirit that the gifts offered by human hands be consecrated, that is, become Christ’s Body and Blood [...].”
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Adam M., Kánonické predpisy Katolíckej cirkvi latinského a byzantského obradu, ktoré sa vzťahujú na látku a formu eucharistickej obety, “Teologický časopis” 1 (2006), p. 5–12. |
| 2. | Auer J., Allgemeine Sakramentenlehre und Das Mysterium der Eucharistie, Regensburg 1980. |
| 3. | Belejkanič I., Pravoslávne dogmatické bohoslovie I., Prešov 1995. |
| 4. | Bieler A., This is my Body – This is my Blood. Inventing Authority in Liturgical Discourse and Practise, “Journal of the European Society of Women in Theological Research” 12 (2004), p. 143–154, file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/Peeters%20(18).pdf (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 5. | Bragança J.O., Struktura modlitwy eucharystycznej, in: Eucharystia, Poznań–Warszawa 1986. |
| 6. | Bugel W., Cesty a scestí reformy syrsko-malabarské liturgie na pozadí indického kontextu, “Studia theologica” 3 (2003), p. 44–54. |
| 7. | Bužek R., Osoba Ducha svatého v pojednání De Trinitate Richarda ze Svatého Viktora, “Studia theologica” 3 (2013), p. 29–42. |
| 8. | Caban P., Slova o ustanovení eucharistie, “Teologické texty” 1 (2005), p. 3–6. |
| 9. | Caban P., Sýrska liturgia v prostredí katolíckej tradície, “Teologické texty” 3 (2012), p. 121–123. |
| 10. | Catechism of the Catholic Church, archeparchy.ca/wcm-docs/docs/catechism-of-the-catholic-church.pdf (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 11. | Chovanec M. Prebývanie Ducha Svätého, in: Boh – Duch Svätý, Nitra 1997, s. 46–57. |
| 12. | Congar Y., Der Heilige Geist, 2. edition, Freiburg–Basel–Vienna 1986. |
| 13. | Cyril Jeruzalémský Sv., Mystagógické katechese, Velehrad 1997. |
| 14. | Conseil Pontifical pour la promotion de l´unité des chrétiens, Richtlinien für die Zulassung zur Eucharistie zwischen der Chaldäischen Kirche und der Assyrischen Kirche des Orients, http://www.christianunity.va/content/unitacristiani/fr/dialoghi/sezione-orientale/chiesa-assira-dell-oriente/altri-documenti/2001---orientamenti-per-lammissione-alleucaristia-fra-la-chiesa-/testo-in-tedesco.html (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 15. | Częsz B., Duch Święty został nam dany. Nauczanie Ojców i wiara starożytnego Kościola,Gniezno 1998. |
| 16. | Dolista J., Perichoréze iniciačních svátostí, “Teologické texty” 2 (1996), p. 49–50. |
| 17. | Enchiridion symbolorum, definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlichen Lehrentscheidungen. Lateinisch – Deutsch, eds. H. Denzinger, P. Hünermann, 37. edition, Freiburg im Breisgau–Basel–Rome–Vienna 1991. |
| 18. | Enchiridion Vaticanum 20, ed. E. Lora, Bologna 2004. |
| 19. | Francis, www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2017/october/documents/papa- |
| 20. | francesco_20171011_convegno-nuova-evangelizzazione.html (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 21. | General Instruction of the Roman Missal, https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/general-instruction-of-the-roman-missal (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 22. | Gerardi R., Epiclesi, in: Lexicon. Dizionario Teologico Enciclopedico, ed. V. Mancuso, 3. edition, Casale Monferrato 1997, p. 350–351. |
| 23. | Jan Damašský Svatý, O pravé víře, Olomouc 1994. |
| 24. | Koch G. Sakramentenlehre – das Heil aus den Sakramenten, in: Glaubenszugänge. Lehrbuch der katholischen Dogmatik, ed. W. Beinert, Band 3, Paderborn–Munich–Vienna–Zürich 1995. |
| 25. | Kunetka F., Jednota iniciačních svátostí z hlediska liturgické teologie, “Teologické texty” 4 (2007), p. 182–185. |
| 26. | Kunetka F., Vývojové linie slavení eucharistie v předkonstantinovské církvi, “Studia theologica” 2 (2015), p. 86–110. |
| 27. | Leo XIII., Encyclical Divinum illud munus, http://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_09051897_divinum-illud-munus.html (access: 13.04.2021). |
| 28. | Lerinský V., Prvé kommonitórium, in: Liturgia hodín podľa rímskeho obradu IV., Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis 1992. |
| 29. | Maturkanič P., Svátosti. Viditelná znamení neviditelné skutečnosti spásy, Prague 2018. |
| 30. | Michalski M., Antologia literatury patrystycznej, t. I, Warszawa 1975. |
| 31. | Müller G.L., Lasst uns mit ihm gehen, Freiburg–Basel–Vienna 1990. |
| 32. | Müller G.L., Katholische Dogmatik, Freiburg–Basel–Vienna 1995. |
| 33. | O´Collins G., Farrugia E.G., Epiclesi, in: Dizionario sintetico di teologia, Vatican 1995, p. 126. |
| 34. | Pavol VI., Apoštolská konštitúcia, ktorou sa vyhlasuje platnosť Rímskeho misála, obnoveného podľa rozhodnutia Druhého vatikánskeho koncilu, in: Posvätná kongregácia pre bohoslužbu, Rímsky misál, Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis 2001. |
| 35. | Polc J.V., Zápas o liturgickou obnovu, “Teologické texty” 4 (1994), p. 111–115. |
| 36. | Posvätná kongregácia pre bohoslužbu, Rímsky misál, Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis 2001. |
| 37. | Pružinský Š., Patrológia. Úvod a počiatky patristickej literatúry I., Bratislava 1990. |
| 38. | Richter K., Vztah církve a liturgie. K recepci Druhého vatikánského koncilu, “Studia theologica” 3 (2010), p. 30–42. |
| 39. | Rowland T., Ratzinger´s faith. The theology of pope Benedict XVI., Oxford 2008. |
| 40. | Różycki I., Podstawy sakramentologii, Cracow 1970. |
| 41. | Schmaus M., Sviatosti, Rome 1981. |
| 42. | Slodička A., Význam východnej tradície v náuke Jána Pavla II., Prešov 2001. |
| 43. | Slodička A., Sviatosti v dogmatickej teológii, “Acta facultatis theologicae Universitatis Comenianae Bratislaviensis” 2 (2005), p. 175–208. |
| 44. | Slodička A., Epikléza – vzývanie Pánovho mena, “Acta facultatis theologicae Universitatis Comenianae Bratislaviensis” 3 (2005), p. 323–324. |
| 45. | TK KBS, Rino Fisichella: “Úprava katechizmu je dogmatický posun vpred”, https://www.tkkbs.sk/view.php?cisloclanku=20180804001 access: 13.04.2021). |
| 46. | Uhrin J., Prednášky z porovnávacej dogmatiky. Porovnanie s Islamom a s pravoslovím, Bratislava 1979. |
| 47. | Ventura V., Neeucharistická liturgie v životě církví, “Teologické texty” 6 (1994), p. 200–203. |