Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia


ISSN: 2450-8543     eISSN: 2353-317X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/cgs.2021.30-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / nr 30
Zur Polysemie der Präposition AUF aus kognitiver Sicht
(The polysemy of the proposition AUF from the cognitive point of view)

Authors: Anna Sulikowska ORCID
Wydział Humanistyczny, Instytut Językoznawstwa, US
Keywords: polysemy preposition cognitive linguistics
Data publikacji całości:2021
Page range:21 (91-111)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 449

Abstract

This article discusses the semantics of the dative construction with the preposition AUF in aspect of the guiding principles within the cognitive semantics. The aim of the analysis is to show diverse variants of use of the preposition AUF, to establish the meanings from the point of view of the Principled Polysemy Model of Tyler/Evans, to identify the protoscene and to reconstruct the semantic network. The starting point of the analysis is the assumption that the protoscene which is based on the daily sensomotor experience, is the conceptual base forother meanings and their motivations.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Baldauf, Christa. Metapher und Kognition: Grundlagen einer neuen Theorie der Alltagsmetapher. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang, 1997.
2.Bączkowska, Anna. „Znaczenia konceptualne przyimków i partykuł angielskich w ujęciu czasoprzestrzeni czterowymiarowej (wstępne założenia metodologiczne)“. Linguistica Bidgostiana 2 (2005): 11–25.
3.Brenda, Maria. „A cognitive perspective on the semantics of NEAR“. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1 (2017): 121–153.
4.Brenda, Maria. „The Semantics of AT“, Annales Neophilologiarum 9 (2015): 25–54.
5.Brugman, Claudia, George Lakoff. „Cognitive topology and lexical networks“. In: Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, hrsg. v. Steven Small, Garrison Cottrell, Michael Tanenhaus, 477–507. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
6.Busse, Dietrich. Semantik. Paderborn: W. Fink, 2009.
7.Cienki, Alan J. Spatial Cognition and the Semantics of Preposition in English, Polish and Russian. München, Berlin, Washington: Otto Sagner, 1989.
8.Croft, William. „The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies“ . In: Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and in Contrast, hrsg. v. René Dirven, Ralf Pörings, 161–206. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 2003.
9.Drosdowski, Günther, Gerhard Augst. Duden Grammatik der Deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 1984.
10.Evans, Vyvyan, Melanie Green. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
11.Evans, Vyvyan. „Prototypes, polysemy and word meaning“. In: The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, hrsg. v. Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, Jorg Zinken, 127–131. London-Oakville: Equinox, 2007.
12.Evans, Vyvyan. „From the spatial to the non-spatial: the ‘state’ lexical concepts of in, on and at“ In: Language, cognition and space: the state of the art and new directions, hrsg. v. Vyvyan Evans, Paul A. Chilton, 215–248. London-Oakville: Equinox, 2010.
13.Grady, Joseph. The Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Dissertation, Berkeley: University of California, 1997. Zugriff 26.11.2020. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2.
14.Jackendoff, Ray. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.
15.Jackendoff, Ray. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
16.Kreitzer, Anatol. „Multiple levels of schematization: A study in the conceptualization of space“. Cognitive Linguistics 8/4 (1997): 291–325.
17.Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.
18.Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson. Leben in Metaphern: Konstruktion und Gebrauch von Sprachbildern. Kempten: Kösel, 2000.
19.Langacker, Ronald. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
20.Langacker, Ronald. Cognitive Grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
21.Meex, Birgitte. „Die Wegpräposition über“. In: Perspectives on Prepositions, hrsg. v. Hubert Cuckyens, Günter Radden, 157–176. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002.
22.Przybylska, Renata. Polisemia przyimków polskich w świetle semantyki kognitywnej. Kraków: Universitas, 2002.
23.Tabakowska Elżbieta. „Space and time in Polish: the preposition za and the verbal prefix za-“. In: Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, hrsg. v. Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven, Klaus-Uwe Panther, 153–177. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010.
24.Tabakowska Elżbieta. „The story of ZA: in defense of the radial category“, Studies in Polish Linguistics 5 (2010): 65–77.
25.Talmy, Leonard. „How Language Structures Space“. In: Spatial Orientation, Theory, Research, and Application, hrsg. v. Herbert L. Pick, Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York, London: Plenum Press, 1983.
26.Talmy, Leonard. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Volumes I and II. Cambridge, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
27.Tyler, Andrea, Vyvyan Evans. „Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks: The Case of OVER“. In: The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, hrsg. v. Vyvyan Evans, B. K. Bergen, J. Zinken, 187–238. London, Oakville: Equinox, 2007.
28.Tyler, Andrea, Vyvyan Evans. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland Press, 2003.
29.Vandermeeren, Sonja. „Polysemie bei der Wechselpräposition ,in‘. Eine kognitiv-semantische Untersuchung“. Deutsche Sprache 2 (2004): 171–194.