Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine

ISSN: 2300-9705     eISSN: 2353-2807    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/cej.2016.3-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  DOAJ

Lista wydań / Vol. 15, No. 3/2016
Sex Differences in Shock Attenuation during Running

Autorzy: Jonathan Sinclair
Centre for Applied Sport & Exercise Sciences, School of Sport & Wellbeing, College of Health & Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
Słowa kluczowe: running gender shock attenuation
Rok wydania:2016
Liczba stron:6 (37-42)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:


The current investigation was conducted to determine whether sex differences in skeletal accelerations and shock attenuation were evident during running. Twelve male and twelve female recreational runners ran at 4.0 m.s-1. Axial accelerations were measured at 1,000 Hz using accelerometers mounted at the tibia and sacrum. Peak tibial and sacrum axial accelerations were obtained and utilized to calculate the extent of shock attenuation. The results showed that peak sacrum accelerations were significantly larger in female runners (5.16 ±0.64 g) compared to males (4.37 ±0.75 g). It was also shown that shock attenuation (31.90 ±19.85%) was significantly lower in female runners in relation to males (47.89 ±11.46%). The findings from the current investigation indicate that female runners experience greater skeletal accelerations which may place greater stress on the musculoskeletal structures required attenuate transients forces which can be detrimental to passive tissues.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Challis, J.H. Pain, M.T.G. (2008). Soft tissue motion influences skeletal loads during impacts. Exercise and Sports Science Reviews, 36, 71–75.
2.Dufek, J.S., Mercer, J.A., Griffin, J.R. (2009). The effects of speed and surface compliance on shock attenuation characteristics for male and female runners. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 25, 219–228.
3.Ferber, R., Davis, I.M., Williams, D.S. (2003). Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clinical Biomechanics, 18, 350– 357.
4.Hamill, J., Derrick, T.R., Holt, K.G. (1995) Shock attenuation and stride frequency during running. Human Movement Science, 14, 45–60.
5.Malinzak, R.A., Colby, S.M., Kirkendall, D.T., Yu, B., Garrett, W.E. (2001). A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clinical Biomechanics, 16, 438–445.
6.Mercer, J.A., Dufek, J.S., Mangus, B.C., Rubley, M.D., Bhanot, K., Aldridge, J.M. (2010). A description of shock attenuation for children running. Journal of Athletic Training, 45, 259–264.
7.Miletic, D., Sestan, B., Pusic, M., Cicvarić, T., Tudor, A., Roth, S., Santic, V. (2012). Unusual consecutive sacral stress fractures in a female distant runner: a case report. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 48, 283–287.
8.Mizrahi, J., Verbitsky, O., Isakov, E., Daily, D. (2000). Effect of fatigue on leg kinematics and impact acceleration in long distance running. Human Movement Science, 19, 139–151.
9.Pester, S., Smith, P. C. (1992). Stress fractures in the lower extremities of soldiers in basic training. Orthopaedic review, 21, 297–303.
10.Robbins, S.E., Hanna, A.M. (1987). Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 19, 148–156.
11.Shorten, M.R., Winslow, D.S. (1992). Spectral analysis of impact shock during running. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 8, 288–304.
12.Sinclair, J., Greenhalgh, A., Edmundson, C.J., Brooks, D., Hobbs, S.J. (2012). Gender differences in the kinetics and kinematics of distance running: implications for footwear design. International Journal of Sports Science & Engineering, 6, 118–128.
13.Sinclair, J., Hobbs, S.J., Taylor, P.J., Currigan, G., Greenhalgh, A. (2014). The influence of different force measuring transducers on lower extremity kinematics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 30, 166–172.
14.Sinclair, J., Edmundson, C.J., Brooks, D., Hobbs, S.J. (2011). Evaluation of kinematic methods of identifying gait Events during running. International Journal of Sport Science & Engineering, 5, 188–192.
15.Sinclair, J, Greenhalgh, A., Edmundson, C.J., Brooks, D., Hobbs, S.J. (2013). The influence of barefoot and barefoot-inspired footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running in comparison to conventional running shoes. Footwear Science, 5, 45–53.
16.Sinclair, J., Bottoms, L., Taylor, K., Greenhalgh, A. (2010). Tibial shock measured during the fencing lunge: the influence of footwear. Sports Biomechanics, 9, 65–71.
17.Sinclair, J., Taylor, P.J., Hobbs, S.J. (2013). Alpha level adjustments for multiple dependent variable analyses and their applicability – a review. International Journal of Sport Science & Engineering, 7, 17–20.
18.Sinclair, J., Selfe, J. (2015). Sex differences in knee loading in recreational runners. Journal of biomechanics, 48 (10), 2171–2175.
19.Taunton, J.E., Ryan, M.B., Clement, D.B., McKenzie, D.C., Lloyd-Smith, D.R., Zumbo, B.D. (2002). A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 95–101.
20.van Gent, R.N., Siem, D., van Middelkoop, M., van Os, A.G., Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A., Koes, B.W. (2007). Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, 469–480.
21.Voloshin, A., Wosk, J. (1982). An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in the human locomotor system. Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 21–27.
22.Whittle, M.W. (1999). The generation and attenuation of transient forces beneath the foot; a review. Gait & Posture, 10, 264–275.