Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine

ISSN: 2300-9705     eISSN: 2353-2807     DOI: 10.18276/cej.2015.3-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Lista wydań / Vol. 11, No. 3/2015
Gender Differences in Limb and Joint Stiffness during the Fencing Lunge

Rok wydania:2015
Liczba stron:6 (39-44)
Słowa kluczowe: fencing biomechanics limb stiffness
Autorzy: Lindsay Bottoms
School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, United Kingdom

Jonathan Sinclair
Division of Sport Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom

Abstrakt

The aim of the current investigation was to examine gender differences in limb and joint stiffness characteristics during the fencing lunge. Ten male and ten female fencers completed simulated lunge movements. Lower limb kinematics were collected using an eight camera optoelectric motion capture system which operated at 250 Hz. Measures of limb and joint stiffness were calculated as a function of limb length and joint moments divided by the extent of limb and joint excursion. Gender differences in limb joint stiffness parameters were examined statistically using independent samples t-tests. The results showed firstly that both limb (male = 64.22 ±19.12, female = 75.09 ±22.15 N.kg.m) and hip stiffness (male = 10.50 ±6.00, female = 25.89 ±15.01 Nm.kg.rad) were significantly greater in female fencers. In addition it was also demonstrated that knee moment (male = 1.64 ±0.23, female = 2.00 ±0.75 Nm.kg) was significantly larger in females. On the basis of these observations, the findings from the current investigation may provide further insight into the aetiology of the distinct injury patterns observed between genders in relation to fencing.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Blickhan R. The spring mass model for running and hopping. J Biomech. 1989; 22: 1217–1227.
2.Butler R.J., Crowell H.P., Davis I.M. Lower extremity stiffness: implication for performance and injury. Clin Biomech. 2003; 18: 511–517.
3.Bret C., Rahmani A., Dufour A.B., Messonnier L., Lacour J.R. Leg strength and stiffness as ability factors in 100 m sprint running. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002; 42: 274–281.
4.Brughelli M., Cronin J. A review of research on the mechanical stiffness in running and jumping: methodology and implications. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008; 18: 417–426.
5.Cappozzo A., Catani F., Leardini A., Benedet M.G., Della C.U. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: Anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech. 1995; 10: 171–178.
6.Cappozzo A., Cappello A., Croce U., Pensalfini F. Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997; 44: 1165–1174.
7.Farley C.T., Gonzalez O. Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running. J Biomech. 1996; 29: 181–186.
8.Farley C.T., Morgenroth D.C. Leg stiffness primarily depends on ankle stiffness during human hopping. J Biomech. 1999; 32: 267–273.
9.Fulkerson J.P., Arendt E.A. Anterior knee pain in females. Clin Ortho Rel Res. 2000; 372: 69–73.
10.Granata K.P., Padua D.A., Wilson S.E. Gender differences in active musculoskeletal stiffness. Part II. Quantification of leg stiffness during functional hopping tasks. J Electromyogr Kines. 2001; 12: 127–135.
11.Greenhalgh A., Bottoms L., Sinclair J. Influence of surface on impact shock experienced during the fencing lunge. J App Biomech. 2013; 29: 463–467.
12.Harmer P.A. Getting to the point: injury patterns and medical care in competitive fencing. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2008; 7: 303–307.
13.Heise G.D., Martin P.E. Leg spring characteristics and the aerobic demand of running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30: 750–754.
14.Hobara H., Inoue K., Gomi K., Sakamoto M., Muraoka T., Iso S., Kanosue K. Continuous change in spring-mass characteristics during a 400 m sprint. J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 13: 256–261.
15.Latash M.L., Zatsiorsky V.M. Joint stiffness: Myth or reality? Hum Mov Sci. 1993; 12: 653–692.
16.McMahon T.A., Cheng G.C. The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? J Biomech. 1990; 23: 65–78.
17.McMahon J.J., Comfort P., Pearson S. Lower limb stiffness: considerations for female athletes. Strength Cond J. 2012; 34: 70–73.
18.Sinclair J., Bottoms L., Taylor K., Greenhalgh A. Tibial shock measured during the fencing lunge, the influence of footwear. Sp Biomech. 2010; 9: 65–71.
19.Sinclair J., Bottoms L. Gender differences in the kinetics and lower extremity kinematics of the fencing lunge. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2013; 13: 440–451.
20.Sinclair J., Taylor P.J., Bottoms L. The Appropriateness of the Helical Axis Technique and Six Available Cardan Sequences for the Representation of 3-D Lead Leg Kinematics During the Fencing Lunge. J Human kinet. 2013; 37: 7–15.
21.Sinclair J. Effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear on knee and ankle loading during running. Clin Biomech. 2014; 29: 395–399.
22.Sinclair J., Bottoms L. Gender differences in the Achilles tendon load during the fencing lunge. Balt J Health Phys Activity. 2014; 6: 199–204.
23.Sinclair J., Bottoms L. Gender Differences in Patellofemoral Load during the Epee Fencing Lunge. Res Sports Med. 2015; 23: 51–58.
24.Wilson T. The measurement of patellar alignment in patellofemoral pain syndrome: are we confusing assumptions with evidence? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37: 330–341.