PHYSIQUE AND FITNESS OF SWIMMERS FROM WEST BENGAL

The purpose of the present study is to assess the physique and fitness status of young school and college age swimmers from West Bengal. This cross sectional study was carried out on 46 male and 9 female swimmers of 9–20 years of age. The study parameters include body height, body weight, BMI, different anthropometric parameters, skinfold thickness and aerobic power, strength, flexibility, blood pressure and pulmonary function. Besides, history of training was taken by questionnaire. In the present study male and female adolescent swimmers have significantly higher body fat than non-swimmer ones. Besides, respiratory capacity, max. oxygen consumption and flexibility parameters are significantly higher in male and female swimmers than those in the control group. Besides, highly significant correlation has been found between sitting height, arm span and hand span of swimmer with swimming speed, years of training(swimming) and percentage of body fat. Again, pulmonary function, strength and max. oxygen consumption parameters are significantly correlated with years of training and speed of swimming (swimming efficiency). Therefore, simple regression equations are constructed to predict strength, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters of adolescent swimmers on the basis of years of swimming and speed of swimming. When different style of swimming is considered it has been observed that highest VO2max value has been found in free style and butterfly swimmers followed by breast stroke and then back stroke swimmers. Swimmers of the present study when compared to international standard, they are shorter and lower in body fat content values and some physiological parameters like Vo2 max, flexibility and hand grip strength than international standard values. From this study it can be concluded that as there is no available information regarding strength, cardiovascular and respiratory status of adolescent girls and boys swimmers of West Bengal, this study can be said to be a pilot study on the basis of which further elaborate investigation requires to be initiated. Thus these baseline information of physique and physiological parameters of adolescent swimmers will provide local database for coaches and sports physiologists to develop proper training schedule and for identification of talent in the early ages.


Introduction
Swimming is not only an athletic endeavor but also a lifesaving necessity.Everyone is able to learn to swim and most suitable years for learning to swim are ages between 10 and 12 (Statkeviciene, Venckunas, 2008) for #0# Methods Subjects -This cross sectional study was carried out on 46 male and 9 female swimmers who were aged between 9-20 years of different swimming clubs of Hooghly district of West Bengal.A age matched control group (10 female and 12 male), non-swimmer subjects of equivalent age were chosen from different schools of West Bengal.
The test items, questionnaire administered and the methods used are given below: Study design -This cross sectional comparative study includes the use of questionnaire, history of athletic activities, strength and speed.It was done among male and female swimmers of age range (9-20 years from Vol. 24, No. 4/2018 Physique and Fitness of Swimmers from West Bengal different swimming clubs of Hooghly district of West Bengal.A control group was taken from school and college students of the same area.
Study area -There are many swimming clubs and training institutes in Hooghly district of West Bengal surrounding Uttarpara, Rishra, Chandannagar where from the subjects were selected at random.The research study was conducted qualitatively and quantitatively.Collection of data was done through questionnaire, interviews and experimental work by post graduate students, research scholars and teachers of Serampore college and Raja Peary Mohan college.

Study questionnaire
-Year of swimming.
-Average practice hours per day.
-Style of swimming.
-No. of Family members.
-Respiratory Diseases (Asthma) and other diseases.
Ethical consideration -The ethical approval was obtained from Human Ethical Committee of Serampore College, 2014-2015.Besides, written consent was taken from club authority and parents of swimmers before the beginning of the study.

Parameters studied
Age (years): Age of subject was determined from their date of birth recorded in the club register and it was rounded off to the nearest whole number.

Anthropometric measurements and somatotyping
3. Body weight (kg) (Damon, Standt, McFarland, 1996): It was measured by standard weighing machine with lightly clothed and barefooted.4. Body height (cm): It was taken by anthropometric rod barefooted. 5. BMI: It was calculated from height and weight by using the equation of Meltzer, Mueller, Annegers, Grines, Albright (1988).BMI (kg/m 2 ) = (Body weight in kg)/(Body height in meters) 2 .6. Sitting height (cm): Vertical distance from the sitting surface to the top of the head (vertex).Sitting height is measured with an anthropometer.7. Arm span (cm): With back against the wall, arms were extended horizontally.Distance taken from out stretched finger tips of one hand to the other.8. Hand span (cm): It was the maximum distance between the tip of the thumb and the tip of the little finger in expanded position of the hand.9. Waist circumference (cm): Horizontal circumference at the level of the greater lateral indentation of trunk.10.Hip circumference (cm): Horizontal circumference at the level almost near protrusion of the buttocks.11.Waist/hip ratio: It was calculated from waist circumference divided by hip circumference.12. Skin fold measurement (mm): Skin fold thickness was measured by Haltain Skinfold Caliper (Haltain Ltd, UK) with constant tension by following guidelines of Johnson, Nelson (1982).Biceps, triceps, sub scapular, Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Anindita Mandal (Majee), Nandita Sarkar supraspinale and medial calf skinfolds were measured on the right side of the body (Chatterjee, Mandal, 1993).13.Percentage of body fat: It was calculated by using the formula of Parizkova (1961).

Measurement of maximum oxygen consumption by
The measurement was taken with the best of two trials with 30 seconds rest between trials.The dynamometer scale was read in kGs. 5. Flexibility by sit and reach test (cm) (Ostyn, Simons, Bunen, Renson, Gerven, 1980) -Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) (lit).

Athletic ability
Speed of swimming: Swimming speed of 50 meters was measured in a 25 meters swimming pool by stopwatch.
Statistical analysis: Mean, standard deviation, correlation between parameters were analyzed.Student's t-test was performed to compare the mean between two groups after performing the normality test by histogram, b 1 , b 2 method and Q-Q Plot method.

Results
Table1 represents the mean ± SD values of some physical, physiological, anthropometric and different pulmonary function parameters of male and female swimmers and a control group of West Bengal.All the physical parameters of male and female swimmers are significantly different from the control group except greater skinfold thickness of both male and female swimmers and thigh skinfold of female swimmers are significantly (P < 0.01) higher in comparison to control group.Anthropometric parameters of swimmers are not significantly different from control group.All the pulmonary function parameters are significantly higher in swimmer boys and girls than the control group indicating greater respiratory capacities and respiratory muscle strength of swimmers.Maximum O 2 consumption values are significantly (P < 0.01 for female and P < 0.001 for male) higher in swimmers than the control group.Handgrip strength is significantly higher in male swimmers than control group.Leg strength although insignificant is lower in swimmers than control group.Flexibility of both male and female swimmers is significantly (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) higher in comparison to control group.Heart rate values are significantly lower in swimmers than control group indicating greater efficiency of swimmers.SBP values are greater in swimmers insignificantly but DBP values are slightly lower in swimmers, of which DBP value of female swimmers is significantly lower than control group.Table 2 represents correlation between physical, some motor fitness parameters and pulmonary functions of swimmer.It has been observed that significant positive correlation exists between age, body height, body weight, BMI and pulmonary function parameters except FEV 1 %, FEF 75-85% and MV.PEFR has strong correlation with age, body height, body weight and BMI in male swimmers.No significant correlation has been found between physical parameters and pulmonary function parameters except FVC & FEV 1 in female swimmers probably due to small number of female swimmers in our study.Blood pressure and heart rate values are significantly correlated with age, body height, body weight and BMI for male swimmers.No significant association has been found between flexibility and physical parameters except forage in male swimmers (P < 0.001).Again, handgrip strength and maximum O 2 consumption (lit/min) are significantly associated with age, body height, body weight and BMI.VO 2max when expressed in ml/kg/min(per kg of body mass), no significant association has been found in the above mentioned parameters in male swimmers.3 represents correlation between speed of swimming, years of swimming and percentage of body fat with body weight, BMI, sitting height, arm span, hand span and physiological parameters of swimmers.Highly significant correlation has been found between sitting height, arm span and hand span with swimming speed, years of swimming and percentage of body fat.No significant correlation has been found between speed of swimming, year of swimming and percentage of body fat with physiological parameters but the relation between speed of swimming and physiological parameters are negative although insignificant.Figure 1 shows VO 2max values according to different style of swimming.Highest VO 2max values have been observed in free style and butterfly swimmers, then breast stroke swimmers and finally back and free style swimmers.
Figure 2 represents comparison of aerobic power of male and female swimmers of present study with international standard value of swimmers, basketball players, gymnasts, track and field players.

Discussion
A young body is flexible and susceptible to various stimuli, which exceed the limit of biological tolerance of the body and are inadequate for the level of development of somatic and motor capacities of a child and may affect the processes of body growth and maturation.Somatic features are an important factor conditioning an achievement in sports (Siders et al., 1993) and are one of the elements taken into consideration during the selection process in specific sports events.
Adolescent male and female swimmers when compared with adult athletes of South Australia (Withers et al., 1987), China (Chen et al., 1989), Israel (Hanne, Dli, Rotstein, 1986) and Nigeria (Mathur, Sulokun, 1985), it was found that in each case swimmers of our study have greater body fat than athletes of other countries probably due to difference in age group, level of training, genetic and environmental factors.
Vol. 24, No. 4/2018 Physique and Fitness of Swimmers from West Bengal Mathur, Salokun (1985) found that athletes with lower percentage of body fat had higher maximum O 2 uptake.Athletes with lower percentage of body fat seem to utilize O 2 more efficiently (Heek, 1980) while excess body fat reported to be deterrent to physical performance (Leelarthaepin, Chesworth, Boleyn, 1983).Again, Smith (1984) observed that a minimum level of fat mass are advantageous for gymnasts, wrestlers, distance runners etc. Adolescent male and female swimmers also have greater body fat when compared with non-athletes (Chatterjee, Mandal, 1993;Mandal, 2005).This difference might be due to level of training, lower number of swimmers in comparison to non-athlete boys and girls and nutritional factors.
Similarly, body height and body weight of boys and girls of present study are shorter and lighter (for girls)/ heavier (for boys) in comparison to young boys and girls of Poland (Ostrowska, Domaradzki, Ignasiak, 2006) at the age of 12.These differences in body dimension in these two groups of boys and girls might be due to difference in age group (mean age for boys of our study is 13.53 and for girls is 12 years) and the ethnic variation between these groups.Again Statkeviciene, Venckunas (2008) pointed out that taller people have the ability to swim better and more correctly.Skinfold fat makes the body more buoyant in the water, if fat distribution over the body is uniform, and that is typical for male.Besides, the ability to maintain body on the surface of water depends not only on body composition but also on the body shape.They concluded that tall people having relatively small body mass and relatively small extremity dimensions but larger skinfold content will learn to swim faster and with higher grades than people with different body dimensions.Colantonio, Barros, Kiss (2003) reported the aerobic capacity of swimmers as well as other athletic activities on treadmill exercise and on swimming flume.The VO 2max value (ml/kg/min) was significantly higher than in male and female swimmers of our study.These differences might be due to differences in method used for measurement of VO 2max , difference in age group, body mass and stature which have direct influence on VO 2max .Besides, genetic factor and the level of training might be the reason for higher VO 2max of swimmers of our study.
Again anthropometric parameters body height, body weight, BMI, sitting height, triceps and subscapular skin fold thickness values of adolescent male and female swimmers show significantly higher values than sedentary boys and girls of West Bengal (Chatterjee, Mandal, 1991, 1993;Mandal, 2006).However, the percentage of body fat value is higher in male swimmers but significantly lower in female swimmers in comparison to their non-swimmer females (Chatterjee, Mandal, 1993).These differences indicated differences in dietary pattern and training regimen of swimmers in comparison to non-swimmers (Nudri, Ismail, Zawiak, 1996) The consistent relationship between height and swimming performance could be explained by the fat than taller swimmers seem to glide better through water (Geladas et al., 2005;Toussaint, Hallander, 1994) and taller swimmers usually show a longer arm span which benefits swimming efficiency (i.e., larger stroke length) (Saavedra et al., 2010).They also suggested that the length of the upper extremities and shoulder width combined may be related with biomechanical factors relevant to propulsion.Leone, Lariviere, Comtois (2002) suggested that certain physical characteristics such as height and limb length are associated with higher level of performance in a particular population of athletes.Siders et al. (1993) reported that anthropometry and other physical characteristics were related to swimming performance.Statkeviciene, Venekunas (2008) stated that height, body part's dimensions and the skin fold content were important parameters of swimming performance.The tall person with relatively small body mass and relatively small extremity dimensions but larger skinfold content will learn to swim faster and with higher grade than persons with different body dimensions.VO 2max (ml/kg/min) values of male and female swimmers of present study are significantly lower than standards value of international standard of swimmers, gymnastics and runners but they have significantly higher VO 2 max value than sedentary girls of West Bengal (Mandal, 2006).These differences might be due to genetic, socioeconomic factors, environmental factors and level of training among the groups (Figure 2).
Besides FVC and FEV 1 values are much higher in swimmers than non-swimmers.This might be due to physical activity having positive influence on the cardiovascular and respiratory system (Dziedziczak, Witkowski, 1988;Ostrowska, Demczuk-Wlodarczyk, Rozek-Mroz, 2001).Ostrowaska et al. (2006) reported that cubic content (body weight, muscles, chest circumferences) indirectly inform about vertical capacity and circular respiratory system efficiency.The diaphragm and accessory muscles reported to physical training in the same way as other muscles and it has been suggested that hypertrophy of the respiratory musculature may account for the higher values of FVC and FEV 1 (Maksud, Hamilton, Couths, Wiley, 1971).Vaccaro, Clarke, Morris (1980) found that the FVC and FEV 1 values of young male swimmers (13-16 years) were 10-16% above normal.
From this study it can be concluded that aerobic capacity of young boys and girls swimmers is much lower than distance runners, rowers, road cyclists, cross country skiers and swimmers of international class.
As there is no available information regarding strength, cardiovascular and respiratory status of adolescent female and male swimmers of West Bengal, this study can be considered to be a pilot study on the basis of which further elaborate investigation requires to be initiated.
Besides, potentiality of swimming performance can be assessed in the adolescent stage (11 and 15 years) and evaluation of their swimming technique is impacted by their anthropometric indices-height, body mass, body part's dimensions and the skinfold fat content.Thus, this baseline data may be helpful for the indication of talent and application of proper training schedule and improvised technique of swimming for adolescent swimmers of this area of West Bengal.

Practical application
This is the first and most comprehensive physique and physiological profile study of Indian (Bengali) swimmers and this test data will provide good baseline reference data for coaches, sports physiologists, physiotherapists and future investigators of this area.
following formula was utilized for calculation of percentage of body fat of boys at the ages of 9-18 years.Percentage of body fat = [(4.95/D)-4.50] × 100 Where D is the body density Now, in case of 9-12 years old boys, the body density (D) is, Where x 4 = Triceps skinfold in cm.And x 5 = Subscapular skinfold in cm.The formula was also utilized to calculate the percentage of body fat of the girls of 9-17 years, Percentage of body fat = [(4.95/D)-4.50] × 100 Where D is the body density For 9-12 years old girls, the body density (D) is, Where x 4 = Triceps skinfold in cm.And x 5 = Subscapular skinfold in cm.The following formula was also utilized to calculate the percentage of body fat of young boys and girls, age ranging from 18 to21 years Percentage of body fat = [(4.95/D)-4.50] × 100 Where D is the body density For, 19-21 years old boys, the body density (D) is, D = 1.1043 -0.00132 (Thigh skinfold) -0.00131 (Subscapular skinfold) For, 18-21 years old girls, the body density (D) is, D = 1.0852 -0.00076 (Suprailliac skinfold) -0.00107 (Thigh skinfold)

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 1.Comparison of aerobic power values of swimmers depending on different style of swimming

Table 1A .
Mean ±SD and 't'-test of physical, physiological, body composition, respiratory and athletic ability parameters of male and female swimmers and control group

Table 1B .
Mean ± SD and 't'-test of physical, physiological, body composition, respiratory and athletic ability parameters of male and female swimmers and control group

Table 2 .
Correlation between different body parameters, respiratory parameters and motor ability parameters of male and female

Table 3 .
Correlation between different body parameters, athletic ability parameters and motor ability parameters of male and

Table 4
represents correlation between physical, physiological and pulmonary function parameters with years of swimming and speed of swimming.Pulmonary function parameters and other physiological parameters and physical parameters have significant (P < 0.05-0.001)correlation with years of swimming and speed of swimming.

Table 4 .
Correlation between different body parameters, athletic ability parameters, respiratory parameters and motor ability parameters of male and female swimmers Table5and 6 represent simple regression equations of strength, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters and BMI on the basis of years of swimming and speed of swimming respectively.

Table 6 .
Simple regression equation of BMI and some physiological parameters on the basis of speed of swimming