Acta Politica Polonica

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

ISSN: 2451-0432     eISSN: 2719-4388    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ap.2022.54-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Lista wydań / 2/2022 (54)
The International Community’s Response to the Ghouta Chemical Attack of 2013

Autorzy: Piotr Pietrzak ORCID
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridiski”, Sofia, Bulgaria
Słowa kluczowe: Ghouta chemical attack nonproliferation Syrian uprising Arab Spring Middle East
Data publikacji całości:2022
Liczba stron:11 (83-93)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstrakt

This paper brings to the fore several sociopolitical and legal dimensions related to the international response to the Ghouta chemical attack of August 2013 that completely redefined the way we approach the Syrian conflict in general. This deadly chemical assault should be seen as one of the most important events that defined the way the international community has dealt with the Syrian Arab Spring, for, according to several influential accounts, the magnitude of this attack clearly transcended the inviolability of the nationstate. Yet, despite gathering compelling prima facie evidence that this attack was linked to Bashar al-Assad’s loyalists, the expected full-blown military retaliation against his regime did not occur. The Syrian regime did not face any severe consequences for its actions except for being exposed to the discomfort of temporary international sanctions that obliged the regime to relinquish its chemical weapons arsenal under international supervision. We know today that despite the promised full cooperation from Syrian officials, the mandate to relinquish all illegal weapons of mass destruction was fulfilled only to a limited extent
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Bain, W. (2010). The Pluralist-Solidarist Debate in the English School. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.342 (30.03.2022).
2.Baker, P., Weisman, J., Stack, L., Murphy, H. (2013). What to Watch for in Obama’s Speech. Retrieved from: https:// www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/what-to-watch-for-in-obamarsquos-speech/ (7.09.2020).
3.Borger, J. (2013). Syrian Chemical Attack Used Sarin and Was Worst in 25 Years, Says UN. The Guardian, 17 September. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/16/syrian-chemical-attack-sarin-says-un (7.09.2020).
4.Burke, J. (2017). The Responsibility to Protect and the Syrian Civil War. Unpublished LLM thesis. Central European University.
5.Chappell, B. (2014). ISIS Declares Caliphate as Iraq Fights to Retake Tikrit. 30 June. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/06/30/326905464/isis-declares-caliphate-as-iraq-fights-to-retake-tikrit (7.09.2020).
6.Chulov, M., Mahmood, M., Sample, I. (2013). Syria Conflict: Chemical Weapons Blamed as Hundreds Reported Killed. The Guardian, 21 August. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/21/syria-conflcit-chemical- weapons-hundreds-killed (7.09.2020).
7.Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. United Nations Treaty Collection, Chapter XXVI: Disarmament. Geneva, 3 September 1992 (Status as at: 22-03-2022 09:16:13). Retrieved from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_ no=XXVI-3&chapter=26 (7.09.2020).
8.Davison, D. (2018). Interview with Joshua Landis: What Happens Now in Syria? June 19. Retrieved from: https://lobelog. com/author/derek-davison (7.09.2022).
9.Gartenstein-Ross, D. et al. (2015). Islamic State vs. Al-Qaeda: Strategic Dimensions of a Patricidal Conflict. New America. Retrieved from: https://static.newamerica.org/attachments/12103-islamic-state-vs-al-qaeda/ISISvAQ_Final.e68fdd22a90e49c4af1d4cd0dc9e3651. pdf (7.09.2020).
10.Genser, J., Cotler, I. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect: The Promise of Stopping Mass Atrocities in Our Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.Higgins, E. (2014). Identifying Government Positions during the 21 August Sarin Attacks. Retrieved from: https://www. bellingcat.com/news/mena/2014/07/15/identifying-government-positions-during-the-august-21st-sarin-attacks (7.09.2020).
12.Human Rights Watch (2013). Attacks on Ghouta: Analysis of Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria. New York: Human Rights Watch. Retrieved from: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/syria_cw0913_web_1.pdf (7.09.2022).
13.Human Rights Watch (2015). Syria: Stories behind Photos of Killed Detainees. Caesar Photos’ Victims Identified. Retrieved from:https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/12/16/syria-stories-behind-photos-killed-detainees (7.09.2020).
14.Human Rights Watch (2017). Flawed Justice: Accountability for ISIS Crimes in Iraq. Retrieved from: https://www.hrw. org/report/2017/12/05/flawed-justice/accountability-isis-crimes-iraq (7.09.2020).
15.Landis, J. (2012). The Syrian Uprising of 2011: Why the Assad Regime Is Likely to Survive to 2013. Middle East Policy, 19 (1). 72–84.
16.Linklater, A., Suganami, H. (2006). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.Nikitin, M.B.D., Kerr, P.K., Feickert, A. (2013). Syria’s Chemical Weapons: Issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
18.Ortagus, M. (2020). Anniversary of Assad’s Brutal Chemical Weapons Attack on Ghouta. Press Statement, 21 August. Retrieved from: https://2017-2021.state.gov/anniversary-of-assads-brutal-chemical-weapons-attackon- ghouta/index.html (7.09.2020).
19.Pietrzak, P. (2022). The Putinization of the situation of women and children during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. In Statu Nascendi Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations: Special Issue: Gender Equality in Politics and International, 5 (2), 19–76.
20.Pietrzak, P. (2022). “A Comparative Study of Russia’s War in Ukraine (2014-, including its 2022 escalation), Russia’s aggression in Georgia (2008), and Russia’s Military Operations in Syria (2015-)” the 7th International Symposium of the Middle East “Political and Social Stability in the Middle East”. VII. Uluslararası Orta Doğu Sempozyumu: Orta Doğu’da Siyasal ve Toplumsal İstikrar (10–11 Mayıs 2022, Çevrimiçi): Edited by Gündoğdu, Emre, Turan, Yunus Bildiriler URL: http://acikerisim.gelisim.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11363/3724/7.%20Orta%20Do%c 4%9fu%20Sempozyum%20Kitab%c4%b1%20-%20Nihai%20kopya.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y.
21.Pietrzak, P. (2021). On the Idea of Humanitarian Intervention. A New Compartmentalization of IR Theories. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.Pietrzak, P. (2020). The Political Ontology of the Idea of Humanitarian Intervention with a Detailed Case Study of the International Community’s Response to the Syrian Conflict (2011–present). Published Ph.D. thesis. Sofia: University St. Kliment Ohridski. Open Access: https://ras.nacid.bg/dissertation-preview/69903 (7.09.2020).
23.Pietrzak, P. (2019). The Syrian Conflict (2011-ongoing): How a Perfectly Winnable Uprising Has Ended Up as a Ferocious Proxy War of Global Importance. In Statu Nascendi. Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations, 2 (1), 34–98.
24.Prendergast, M. (2019). Madonnas and Whores or Blood and Gore? Roles for Women in the so-called Islamic State. In Statu Nascendi. Journal of Political Philosophy and International Relations, 2 (2), 336.
25.Richinick, M. (2013). Obama: “I Didn’t Set a Red Line. The World Set a Red Line”. MSNBC News, 9 April. Retrieved from: http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/obama-i-didnt-set-red-line-the- world (28.08.2022).
26.Ruthven, M. (2014). The Map ISIS Hates. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from: https://www.nybooks.com/ daily/2014/06/25/map-isis-hates (9.09.2022).
27.Thakur, R., Maley, W. (2015). Theorising the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.Trapp, R. (2014). Elimination of the Chemical Weapons Stockpile of Syria. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 19 (1), 7–23. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26296277 (7.09.2020).
29.Trapp, R. (2017). The Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria: Implications and Consequences. In: F.B. Hoffmann, D. Renn, J. Schmaltz, F. Wolf, M. (eds.), One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51664-6_19, 363–378.
30.Washington Post’s Editorial Board (2020). Opinion: Syria’s brutal dictatorship suffers a severe setback. Washington Post, 23 June. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/syrias-brutal-dictatorshipsuffers- a-severe-setback/2020/06/23/355548ac-b0c0-11ea-8f56-63f38c990077_story.html (7.09.2020).
31.White House (2013). Government Assessment of the Syrian Government’s Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21, 2013. Official Press Release, 30 August. Retrieved from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/ 2013/08/30/government-asseSsment-syrian-government-s-use-chemical-weapons-august-21 (7.09.2020).