Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

Currently: Acta Politica Polonica

ISSN: 0867-0617    OAI
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  CEEOL  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 2/2014 (28)
Kollektive Erwählung und souveräne Gleichheit
(Collectiva election and sovereign equality)

Authors: Joachim von Wedel
Instytut Politologii i Europeistyki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: collective election, myth, international law, sovereign equality
Data publikacji całości:2014
Page range:10 (71-80)

Abstract

Certain elements of – widespread in Europa until the beginning of the 20. century – convictions for be collectively (nationally) elected can still be seen today in US foreignpolicy. The article tries to qualify the phenomenon, looking at it from the perspective of its adressees. While the principle of sovereign equality due to several cases of legallysanctioned inequality can hardly be used as a means of defense, for two other reasons there is ground for calmness in face of ideas of collective election: at first all those ideas will, as will any mythically founded narration, sooner or later disappear, especially, as they are regularly tied to phases of power expansion. Secondly, some changes in today’s international politics – especially a progressing tendency towards regulation – increasingly impede the most painful expressions of collective election.

Bibliography

1.Bornhak C., Einseitige Abhängigkeitsverhältnisse unter den modernen Staaten, Leipzig 1896.
2.Carile M.C., The Vision of the Palace of the Byzantine Emperors as a Heavenly Jerusalem, Spoleto 2012.
3.Dexinger E., Erwählung und jüdisches Selbstverständnis, w: A. Mosser, Hg, „Gottes auserwählte Völker“. Erwählungsvorstellungen und kollektive Selbstfindung in der Geschichte, Frankfurt am Main 2001.
4.Ellenfeld E., Die Gleichheit der Staaten, Königsberg 1925.
5.Ignatieff M., Introduction w: Ignatieff M., American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, Princeton-Oxford 2005.
6.Kissinger H., The Diplomacy Generated by the Arab Spring Replaces Westphalian Principles of Equilibrium with a Generalized Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention, „Washington Post”, 2. Juni 2012.
7.Moltmann J., Das Kommen Gottes. Christliche Eschatologie, Gütersloh 1995.
8.Münkler H., Die Deutschen und ihre Mythen, Berlin 2009.
9.Seeger Ch., Die unilaterale humanitäre Intervention im System des Völkerrechts, Baden-Baden 2009.
10.Spanos W.V., American Exceptionalism in the Age of Globalization. The Specter of Vietnam, Albany (New York) 2008.