Acta Politica Polonica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

ISSN: 2451-0432    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ap.2018.46-03
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 4/2018 (46)
Efekt głosowania przyjacielsko-sąsiedzkiego w wyjaśnianiu zachowań wyborczych
(The friends and neighbours voting effect and its role in explaining electoral behaviour)

Authors: Tomasz Czapiewski
Keywords: voting candidates elections personal vote political geography
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:14 (33-46)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The friends and neighbours voting effect can be defined as a phenomenon in which voters prefer candidates residing or working in a geographically close neighborhood. It has been widely described in foreign literature, but not in Poland. The aim of this article is to indicate the most important research findings referring to the phenomenon, based on a broad analysis of scientific literature. The author states that the friends and neighbours voting effect is not limited to any part of the world or a specific electoral system. The effect is one of the indispensable elements of any model of voting behavior. On the other hand, although the occurrence of the phenomenon is stable, it can be concluded that the friends and neighbours voting effect has a strongly contextual character. The factors such as the electoral system, the attributes of the candidates, the intensity of the political dispute or the internal organization of political parties will affect the extent to which this effect will occur.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.André, A., Depauw, S. (2016). Looking Beyond the District. The Representation of Geographical Sub-constituencies Across Europe. International Political Science Review, 2 (39), 256–272. DOI: 10.1177/0192512116671527.
2.Antkowiak, P., Scheffs, Ł. (2015). Nowy wymiar przywództwa politycznego. W poszukiwaniu perspektywy do ba¬dań personalizacji polityki na poziomie lokalnym. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 1, 143–159. DOI: 10.14746/ssp.2015.1.8.
3.Arter, D. (2011). Taking the Gilt off the Conservatives’ Gingerbread. The April 2011 Finnish General Election. West European Politics, 6 (34), 1284–1295. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.616666.
4.Arzheimer, K., Evans, J. (2012). Geolocation and Voting. Candidate–Voter Distance Effects on Party Choice in the 2010 UK General Election in England. Political Geography, 5 (31), 301–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.04.006.
5.Arzheimer, K., Evans, J. (2014). Candidate Geolocation and Voter Choice in the 2013 English County Council Elec¬tions. Research & Politics, 1 (2), 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2053168014538769.
6.Bengtsson, Å., Wass, H. (2011). The Representative Roles of MPs. A Citizen Perspective. Scandinavian Political Stu¬dies, 2 (34), 143–167. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00267.x.
7.Black, E., Black, M. (1973). The Wallace Vote in Alabama. A Multiple Regression Analysis. Journal of Politics, 3 (35), 730–736. DOI: 10.2307/2129154.
8.Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Dobrzynska, A., Nevitte, N., Nadeau, R. (2003). Does the Local Candidate Matter? Candidate Effects in the Canadian Election of 2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 3 (36), 657–664. DOI: 10.1017/ S0008423903778810.
9.Bowler, S., Donovan, T., Snipp, J. (1993). Local Sources of Information and Voter Choice in State Elections. Mi¬crolevel Foundations of the “Friends and Neighbors” Effect. American Politics Quarterly, 4 (21), 473–489. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X9302100405.
10.Campbell, R., Cowley, P. (2014). What Voters Want. Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experi¬ment. Political Studies, 4 (62), 745–765. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12048.
11.Carey, J.M., Shugart, M.S. (1995). Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote. A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formu¬las. Electoral Studies, 4 (14), 417–439. DOI: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.
12.Crisp, B.F., Desposato, S.W. (2004). Constituency Building in Multimember Districts. Collusion or Conflict? The Jour¬nal of Politics, 1 (66), 136–156. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00145.x.
13.Cutler, F. (2002). The Simplest Shortcut of All. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice. The Journal of Politics, 2 (64), 466–490. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.00135.
14.Czapiewski, T. (2016). Mapa wyborcza Szczecina. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie preferencji politycznych szczecinian w latach 2006–2015. Acta Politica Polonica, 2 (36), 21–34. DOI: 10.18276/ap.2016.36-02.
15.Eder, N., Jenny, M., Müller, W.C. (2015). Winning over Voters or Fighting Party Comrades? Personalized Constituency Campaigning in Austria. Electoral Studies, 39, 316–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.008.
16.Evans, J., Arzheimer, K., Campbell, R., Cowley, P. (2017). Candidate Localness and Voter Choice in the 2015 General Election in England. Political Geography, 59, 61–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.009.
17.Faith, R.L., Tollison, R.D. (1983). Voter Search for Efficient Representation. Research in Law and Economics, 5, 211– 224.
18.Fiva, J.H., Halse, A.H. (2016). Local Favoritism in At-large Proportional Representation Systems. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 15–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.002.
19.Fiva, J.H., Smith, D.M. (2017). Local Candidates and Voter Mobilization. Evidence from Historical Two-Round Elec¬tions in Norway. Electoral Studies, 45, 130–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.021.
20.Flis, J. (2014). Złudzenia wyboru. Społeczne wyobrażenia i instytucjonalne ramy w wyborach do sejmu i senatu. Kra¬ków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
21.Forrest, J., Johnston, R.J. (1973). Spatial Aspects of Voting in the Dunedin City Council Elections of 1971. New Zealand Geographer, 2 (29), 166–181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.1973.tb00711.x.
22.Gendźwiłł, A. (2015). Jarosław Flis – „Złudzenia wyboru. Społeczne wyobrażenia i instytucjonalne ramy w wyborach do sejmu i senatu”. Decyzje, 23, 123–130.
23.Gendźwiłł, A., Raciborski, J. (2014). Jak głosują wyborcy w warunkach preferencyjnych list wyborczych. Przypadek Polski. Decyzje, 22, 47–70. DOI: 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.33.
24.Gimpel, J.G., Karnes, K.A., McTague, J., Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2008). Distance-Decay in the Political Geography of Friends-and-Neighbors Voting. Political Geography, 2 (27), 231–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.10.005.
25.Górecki, M. (2015). „Głosowanie przyjacielsko-sąsiedzkie”. Przyczynek do badań w kontekście polskim. Studia Socjo¬logiczno-Polityczne. Seria Nowa, 1 (3), 63–73.
26.Górecki, M.A., Marsh, M. (2012). Not Just ‘Friends and Neighbours’. Canvassing, Geographic Proximity and Voter Choice. European Journal of Political Research, 5 (51), 563–582. DOI: 10.1177/2053168014538769.
27.Górecki, M.A., Marsh, M. (2014). A Decline of ‘Friends and Neighbours Voting’ in Ireland? Local Candidate Effects in the 2011 Irish ‘Earthquake Election’. Political Geography, 41, 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.03.003.
28.Haman, J. (2005). Większościowy system wyborczy. Oczekiwania, ograniczenia, rozwiązania alternatywne. Decyzje, 4, 5–28.
29.Hazan, R.Y. (1999). Constituency Interests without Constituencies. The Geographical Impact of Candidate Selection on Party Organization and Legislative Behavior in the 14th Israeli Knesset, 1996–99. Political Geography, 7 (18), 791–811. DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00028-1.
30.Hazan, R.Y., Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequ¬ences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.Hessels, M. (2013). Nationwide Localism. Voter-Candidate Proximity Effects in Two Types of Dutch Elections. Amster¬dam: University of Amsterdam.
32.Jankowski, M. (2016). Voting for Locals. Voters’ Information Processing Strategies in Open-List PR Systems. Electoral Studies, 43, 72–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.005.
33.Johnston, R., Wickham-Jones, M., Pattie, C., Cutts, D., Pemberton, H. (2016). Friends and Neighbours Voting Revisi¬ted. The Geography of Support for Candidates to Lead the UK’s Labour Party. Political Geography, 55, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.02.003.
34.Johnston, R.J. (1974). Local Effects in Voting at a Local Election. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64, 418–429. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1974.tb00990.x.
35.Kavanagh, A., Mills, G., Sinnott, R. (2004). The Geography of Irish Voter Turnout. A Case Study of the 2002 General Election. Irish Geography, 2 (37), 177–186. DOI: 10.1080/00750770409555841.
36.Key, V.O. (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
37.Kjar, S.A., Laband. D.N. (2002). On ‘Home Grown-Ness’ in Politics. Evidence from the 1998 Election for Alabama’s Third Congressional District. Public Choice, 1–2 (112), 143–150. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015605301245.
38.Kruszyńska, P. (2018). Rywalizacja w ramach listy wyborczej jako konsekwencja systemu list półotwartych w wybo¬rach do Sejmu RP. Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne, 24, 18–32. DOI: 10.19195/1643-0328.24.2.
39.Latner, M., McGann, A. (2005). Geographical Representation under Proportional Representation. The Cases of Israel and the Netherlands. Electoral Studies, 4 (24), 709–734. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.02.007.
40.Lewis-Beck, M.S., Rice, T.W. (1983). Localism in Presidential Elections. The Home State Advantage. American Jour¬nal of Political Science, 3 (27), 548–556. DOI: 10.2307/2110984.
41.Malcova, K. (2012). The Local Aspect of Electoral Support for Candidates to the Senate of the Czech Republic. Socio¬logicky Casopis – Czech Sociological Review, 2 (48), 283–313.
42.Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Jo¬urnal of Politics, 3 (61), 628–657.
43.Marcinkiewicz, K. (2014). Electoral Contexts that Assist Voter Coordination. Ballot Position Effects in Poland. Electo¬ral Studies, 33, 322–334. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.018.
44.McAllister, I. (2015). The Personalization of Politics in Australia. Party Politics, 3 (21), 337–345. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813487111.
45.Meredith, M. (2013). Exploiting Friends-and-Neighbors to Estimate Coattail Effects. American Political Science Re¬view, 4 (107), 742–765. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055413000439.
46.Put, G.-J., 2015. All Politics is Local. The Geographical Dimension of Candidate Selection. The Case of Belgium (1987–2010). Leuven: KU Leuven.
47.Rice, T.W., Macht, A.A. (1987a). Friends and Neighbors Voting in Statewide General Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 448–452. DOI: 10.2307/2111084.
48.Rice, T.W., Macht, A.A. (1987b). The Home Town Advantage. Mobilization or Conversion? Political Behavior, 3 (9), 257–262.
49.Roy, J., Alcantara, Ch. (2015). The Candidate Effect. Does the Local Candidate Matter? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 2 (25), 195–214. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2014.925461.
50.Simiyu, R. (2010). Politics of Residency, Friends and Neighbors Effect, and Voting Patterns in Kwanza Constituency, Kenya, 1988–2000. African Geographical Review, 1 (29), 37–61. DOI: 10.1080/19376812.2010.9756225.
51.Tatalovich, R. (1975). “Friends and Neighbors” Voting. Mississippi, 1943–73. The Journal of Politics, 3 (37), 807–814. DOI: 10.2307/2129327.
52.Tavits, M. (2010). Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behaviour. The Case of Estonia. Party Politics, 2 (16), 215–235. DOI: 10.1177/1354068809341053.
53.Thielemann, G.S. (1993). Local Advantage in Campaign Financing. Friends, Neighbors, and Their Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections. The Journal of Politics, 2 (55), 474–478.
54.Trumm, S., Sudulich, L., Townsley, J. (2017). Information Effect on Voter Turnout. How Campaign Spending Mobilises Voters. Acta Politica, 4 (52), 461–478. DOI: 10.1057/s41269-016-0027-8.
55.Vandeleene, A. (2017). Friends and Neighbours Politics in Belgian Candidate Selection Processes. Does Place Matter? Oslo: ECPR General Conference.
56.Zarycki, T. (1997). Nowa przestrzeń społeczno-polityczna Polski. Warszawa: Europejski Instytut Rozwoju Regional¬nego i Lokalnego.