1. | A. Bolecki, Porozumienia zakazane ze względu na cel lub skutek – aktualne tendencje orzecznicze w Unii Europejskiej, Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 2012 nr 3(1). |
2. | P. IbañezColomo, Market Failures, Transaction Costs and Article 101(1) TFEU Case Law, European Law Review 2012, t. 5. |
3. | A. Jones, Left Behind by Modernisation? Restrictions by Object Under Article 101(1), European Competition Journal 2010, t. 6, nr 3. |
4. | J. Killick, P. Berghe, This is Not the Time to be Tinkering with Regulation 1/2003. Is is Time for Fundamental Reform Europe Should Have Change We Can Believe In, Competition Law Review 2010, t. 6, nr 2. |
5. | S. King, The Object Box: Law, Policy or Myth, European Competition Journal 2011, t. 7, nr 2. |
6. | G. Murray, In search of the obvious: Groupement des CartesBancaires and „By Object” infringements in EU competition law, EuropeanCompetition Law Review 2015, t. 36, nr 2. |
7. | A. Silberman, Future Directions for Vertical Restraints – Toward Renewing a Meaningful Dialogue, Antitrust Law Journal 1988, t. 57, nr 49. |
8. | A. Stawicki, Porozumienia zakazane ze względu na cel, a porozumienia zakazane ze względu na skutek, Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny 2012 nr 1(1). |
9. | R. Whish, Competition Law, Oxford 2009. |