Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2016.13-04

Lista wydań / 1/2016 (13)
European Administration of the Danube in Hungary

Autorzy: Erzsébet Csatlós
University of Szeged
Słowa kluczowe: Danube multi-level governance European administration water management WFD
Rok wydania:2016
Liczba stron:23 (55-77)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Liczba pobrań ?: 108


The European Union (EU) is determined to find integrated solution for common problems like environmental challeges and water management. Finding solution for common challenges requires trust and cooperation from every actor involved. This is the basic principle of EU on the question of water management. Meanwhile, an effective handling of the same problem requires stong cooperation and unity in execution that is the adoption of the same goals is not enought, the administration also needs some kind of interrelation. However, the difference in competences of EU legislation on these different but strongly attached legal areas can lead to an insignificant result or just degrade the efficiency of the cooperation. The paper aims to reveal the mass lofty goals and their realisation in the view of administrative reality and future prospects in a Hungarian point of view.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Baranyai G., Transboundary Water Cooperation in the European Union: a HydroPolitical Gap Assessment, VOP-1.1.1-2001-0001 project of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary, 30 June 2015.
2.Berthier A., Krämer L., The Aarhus Convention: Implementation and Compliance in EU Law, ClientEarth, June 2014.
3.Csatlós E., Effect of EU Law on National Administration with aNew Input of Fundamental Rights Protection, in: Harmonisation of Serbian and Hungarian Law with the European Union Law, ed. K. Ranko, Thematic Collection of Papers Vol. III, Faculty of Law Novi Sad Publishing Center, Novi Sad 2015.
4.Fairbrass J., Jordan A., Multi-level Governance and Environmental Policy, in: The MultiGovernance of Water: Four Case Studies, eds. M. Finger, L. Tamiotti, J. Allouche, State University of New York Press, New York 2004.
5.Fejes Zs., Az önkormányzatok alkotmányos helye és szerepe a határon átnyúló együttműködések rendszerében, “Kül-Világ” 2010, Vol. 10, No. 4.
6.Finger M., Tamiotti L., Allouche J., Introduction: Conceptual Elements, in: The MultiGovernance of Water: Four Case Studies, eds. M. Finger, L. Tamiotti, J. Allouche, State University of New York Press, New York 2006.
7.Galambosi M.M., Consultation on Planned Measures – Experience of Hungary 2013, (21.12.2015).
8.Gasparotti C., A Modern Approach of Water Management in the Danube River Basin, “Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society” 2012, Vol. 7, No. 4.
9.Gazdag I., Rendeletalkotás a vízügyi ágazatban, in: EU Intergráció-Önkormányzatok III., ed. Csefkó F., Gálos Nyomdász Kft., Pécs 2002.
10.Gorove S., Law and Politics of the Danube: an Interdisciplinary Study, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1964.
11.Keessen A.M., van Kempen J.J.H, van Rijswick H.F.M.W., Transboundary River Basin Management in Europe. Legal Instruments to Comply with European Water Management Obligations in Case of Transboundary Water Pollution and Floods, “Utrecht Law Review” 2008, Vol. 4, No. 3.
12.Lagendijk A., Regionalisation in Europe. Stories, Institutions and Boundaries, in: B/ordering Space Ashgate, ed. H. van Houtum, O. Kramsch, W. Zierhofer, Aldershot 2005.
13.Linnerooth J., The Danube River Basin: Negotiating Settlements to Transboundary Environmental Issues, “Natural Resources Journal”1990, Vol. 30.
14.McCaffrey S., The Danube River Basin, in: The Multi-Governance of Water. Four Case Studies, eds. M. Finger, L. Tamiotti, J. Allouche, State University of New York Press 2006.
15.Mische P., National Sovereignty and Environmental Law, in: Biodiversity and International Law. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Law, ed. S. Bilderbeek, IOS Press, Amsterdam 1992.
16.Peters B.G., Pierre J., Multi-level Governance and Democracy: A Faustian Bargain?, in: Multi-level Governance, ed. I. Bache, M. Flinders, Oxford University Press,Oxford 2004.
17.Piattoni S., The Theory of Multi-level Governance Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
18.Szilágyi Sz., Gajdics A.G., Transboundary Watershed – Joint Legal Action for Danube Implementation of the Water Framework Directive – an Overview of the Hungarian, Croatian, Serbian and Slovenian Situation, EnvironmentalManagement and Law Association 2010, (20.12.2015).
19.Wescoat J.L. Jr, Main Currents in Early Multilateral Water Treaties: A Historical Geographic Perspective 1648–1948, “Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy” 1995, Vol. 7, No.1.
20.Wolfslehner B. et al., Potentials of the Danube Strategy for a Sustainable Development in Central and Eastern Europe, “Interdisziplinäre Projektstudie” WS 2011/2012UBRM, 2012, (20.12.2015).
21.Affaire Tătar c. Roumanie (Requête no 67021/01) Arrêt de 27 janvier 2009, ECtHR. 108.
22.Case C-32/05 Commission of the European Communities v. Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, OJ C 82, 02.04.2005.
23.Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters Aarhus, Denmark, 25 June 1998. 2161 UNTS 447.
24.Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of the Danube River. Sofia, 29 Jun. 1994 [22 Oct. 1998] OJ L 342, 12/12/1997 p. 19–43 [DRPC]
25.Danube Basin: Facts & Figures. (21.12.2015).
26.Danube River Basin District Management Plan, 14 Dec. 2009, (20.12.2015) [DRBMP].
27.European Outline Convention on transfrontier co-operation between territorial communities or authorities, Madrid, 21 May 1980. 1272 UNTS 61. (21.12.2014).
29.ICPDR, Countries of the Danube River Basin, (09.12.2015).
30.Integrated Tisza River Basin Management Plan, ICPDR 2011,
31.Participants, (09.12.2015).
32.Parties, chapter=27&lang=enb (13.01.2015).