Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Iuris Stetinensis

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.30-07

Issue archive / 2/2020 (30)
Scope of application of the generał rule in the Rome II Regulation

Authors: Magdalena Wasylkowska-Michór
Keywords: tort/delict Rome II Regulation general rule traffic accident escape clause
Year of publication:2020
Page range:18 (89-106)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 75


The purpose of the paper is to determine the scope of application of Article 4(1), which con- stitutes the general rule of the Rome II Regulation concerning the law applicable to non- contractual obligations. Article 4(1) says that: unless otherwise provided for in this Regula¬tion, the law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a tort/delict shall be the law of the country in which the damage occurs. However, this rule is subject to numerous exceptions, which the author divided into three groups: 1) exceptions resulting from the structure of Article 4 (Article 4(2) - common habitual residence in the same country, and Article 4(3) - escape clause), 2) exceptions resulting from the whole Regulation (Articles 5 to 9 - separate regulations for different types of tort, Articles 10 to 12 - separate regulations for non-contractual obligations, Article 14 - freedom of choice, Article 16 - overriding man- datory provisions, Article 17 - rules of safety and conduct), 3) restrictions resulting from other acts of EU and international law (the Hague Convention of 4 May 1971 on the Law Applicable to Traffic Accidents). The analysis resulted is the thesis that Article 4(1) of the Regulation applies to a few types of cases (mainly traffic accidents), which, however, happen quite frequently. The author of the paper refers to the provisions of law (analysis of existing legal regulations), as well as to literature based on these provisions, and therefore uses the dogmatic and legal methods of scientific research.
Download file

Article file


1.Alferez, F.J.G., The Rome II Regulation: on the way towards a European private Interna-tional law code, “European Legal Forum Zeitschrift” 2007, No. 3.
2.Dickinson, A., The Rome II Regulation: the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, Oxford 2009.
3.Fentiman, R., The significance of closer connection, in: Ahern, J. and Binchy, W. (eds.), The Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations: a new in- ternational litigation regime, Leiden 2009.
4.Frohlich, C.W., The private international law of non-contractual obligations according to the Rome II Regulation, Hamburg 2008.
5.Fuchs, A., Zum Kommissionvorschlag einer “Rom II”-Verordnung, “Zeitschrift fur Geme- inschaftsprivatrecht” 2003-2004, Vol. 2.
6.Heiss, H. and Loacker, L.D., Die Vergemeinschaftung des Kollisionsrechts der aufierver- traglichen Schuldverhaltnisse durch Rom II, “Juristische Blatter” 2007, Vol. 129.
7.Hohloch, G., The Rome IIRegulation: an overview. Place of injury, habitual residence, clo¬ser connection and substantive scope: the basic principles, “Yearbook of Private Inter¬national Law 2007”, Vol. 9.
8.Jagielska, M., Prawo właściwe dla wypadków drogowych - rozporządzenie Rzym II a kon¬wencja haska o prawie właściwym dla wypadków drogowych, in: Dańko-Roesler, A. et al., Rozprawy z prawa prywatnego oraz notarialnego. Księga pamiątkowa dedykowa¬na profesorowi Maksymilianowi Pazdanowi, Warszawa 2014.
9.Kramer, X.E., The Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obliga-tions: The European private international law tradition continued. Introductory obser- vations andgeneral rules, “Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht” 2008.
10.Leible, S. and Lehmann, M., Die neue EG-Verordnung uber das auf ausservertragliche Schuldverhaltnisse anzuwendende Recht (“Rom II”), “Recht der Internationalen Wirt- schaft” 2007.
11.Pazdan, J., Rozporządzenie Rzym II - nowe wspólnotowe unormowanie właściwości pra-wa dla zobowiązań pozaumownych, “Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodo-wego” 2009, Vol. 4.
12.Pazdan, M. (ed.), Rozporządzenie (WE) Nr 864/2007 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady dotyczące prawa właściwego dla zobowiązań pozaumownych (Rzym II). Komentarz 2018, SIP Legalis.
13.Pazdan, M. (ed.), Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. System Prawa Prywatnego. Tom 20 B, Warszawa 2015.
14.Sonnentag, M., Zur Europaisierung des Internationalen ausservertraglichen Schuldrechts durch die geplante Rom II-Verordnung, “Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Rechtswissen- schaft” 2006, No. 105.
15.Symeonides, S.C., Rome II and tort conflict: a missed opportunity, “American Journal of Comparative Law” 2008, Vol. 56.
16.Von Ofner, H., Die Rom II-Verordnung-Neues Internationales Privatrecht fur ausserver- tragliche Schuldverhaltnisse in der Europaischen Union, “Zeitschrift fur Vergleichen- de Rechtswissenschaft” 2008, No. 3.
17.Von Graziano, T.K., Das auf ausservertragliche Schuldverhaeltnisse anzuwendende Recht nach Inkrafttreten der Rom II-Verordnung, “Rabels Zeitschrift fuer auslaendisches und internationales Privatrecht” 2009, No. 1(73).