ISSN: 1734-9923
eISSN: 2300-7621
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.55-02
Lista wydań /
55 (2021)
Holism and Atomism in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Autorzy: |
Krystian
Bogucki
Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet Warszawski |
| Słowa kluczowe: | Ludwig Wittgensteim Holism Atomizm Znaczenie Traktat logiczno-filozoficzny. |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2021 |
| Liczba stron: | 24 (25-48) |
Abstrakt
W artykule omawiam trzy koncepcje tego, czym jest holizm w Traktacie logiczno-filozoficznym Ludwiga Wittgensteina. Trzy stanowiska, które wyróżniam są następujące: i) Holizm Minimalistyczny (E. Anscombe, M. Black, D. Pears); ii) Holizm Umiarkowany (J. Conant, C. Diamond, G. Ryle); iii) Holizm Radykalny (G. Bar-Elli, M. Kremer, P. Livingston). Wnioskiem z mojej pracy jest stwierdzenie, iż Holizm Umiarkowany stanowi najbardziej adekwatną koncepcję holistycznych elementów w dziele Wittgensteina. Sądzę tak, ponieważ pogląd ten pozwala nam dostrzec, że holizm i atomizm stanowią dwa komplementarne aspekty Traktatu, trafnie odrzuca anachronistyczną interpretację ontologii dzieła Wittgensteina oraz poprawnie charakteryzuje użycie jako pojęcie o charakterze logiczno-syntaktycznym. W zakończeniu artykułu wskazuję konsekwencje podejmowanego przeze mnie tematu na całościową interpretację zarówno wczesnych, jak i późnych prac Wittgensteina.
Pobierz plik
Plik artykułu
Bibliografia
| 1. | Anscombe, G.E.M. (1962). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. |
| 2. | Bar-Elli, G. (2005). Meaning and Use in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus (in Hebrew). Iyyun, 54, 375–402. English version available online at http://www.bar-elli. co.il/meanUse.pdf. |
| 3. | Black, M. (1966). A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. |
| 4. | Bronzo, S. (2011). Context, Compositionality, and Nonsense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In: R. Read, M. Lavery (eds.), Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate (pp. 84–111). London: Routledge. |
| 5. | Bronzo, S. (2013). Atomism, Contextualism, and the Burden of Making Sense Cavellian Themes in the Tractatus. Wittgenstein-Studien, 4 (1), 96–108. |
| 6. | Caruthers P. (1989). Tractatarian Semantics: Finding Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| 7. | Conant, J. (1998). Wittgenstein on Meaning and Use. Philosophical Investigations, 21, 222–250. |
| 8. | Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. In: E.H. Reck (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (pp. 374–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| 9. | Conant, J. (2004). Why Worry about the Tractatus? In: B. Stocker (ed.), Post-Analytic Tractatus (pp. 167–192). London: Routledge. |
| 10. | Dain, E. (2006). Contextualism and Nonsense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. South African Journal of Philosophy, 25 (2), 91–101. |
| 11. | Diamond, C. (1981). What Nonsense Might Be. Philosophy, 215 (56), 5–22. Reprinted in C. Diamond, 1995. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| 12. | Diamond, C. (1984). What Does a Concept Script Do? The Philosophical Quarterly, 136, vol. 34, 343–368. [Reprinted in C. Diamond, 1995. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press]. |
| 13. | Diamond, C. (1988). Throwing Away the Ladder. Philosophy, 243, 63, 5–27. [Reprinted in C. Diamond, 1995. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press]. |
| 14. | Diamond, C. (1995). The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| 15. | Diamond, C. (2000). Does Bismarck Have a Beetle in His Box? The Private Language Argument in the Tractatus. In: A. Crary, R. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 262–292). London: Routledge. |
| 16. | Diamond, C. (2002). Truth before Tarski. In: E.H. Reck (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (pp. 252–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| 17. | Diamond, C. (2006). Peter Winch on the Tractatus and the Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. In: A. Pichler, S. Säätelä (eds.), Wittgenstein. The Philosopher and His Works (pp. 141–171). Frankfurt: Ontos. |
| 18. | Fodor, J., LePore, E. (1992). Holism. A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| 19. | Frege, G. (1891). Function and Concept. In: G. Frege (1984), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (pp. 182–194). Ed. B. McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| 20. | Frege, G. (1892a). On Sense and Meaning. In: G. Frege (1984), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (pp. 157–177). Ed. B. McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| 21. | Frege, G. (1892b). On Concept and Object. In: G. Frege (1984), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy (pp. 182–194). Ed. B. McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell. |
| 22. | Gaskin, R. (2013). When Logical Atomism Met the Theaetetus: Ryle on Naming and Saying. In: M. Beaney (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 851–869). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| 23. | Glock, H.-J. (2004). All Kinds of Nonsense. In: E. Ammereller, E. Fisher (eds.), Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations (pp. 221–245). London: Routledge. |
| 24. | Hacker, P.M.S. (2000). Was He Trying to Whistle It? In: A. Crary, R. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein (pp. 353–388). London: Routledge. |
| 25. | Hacker, P.M.S. (2003). Wittgenstein, Carnap and the New American Wittgensteinians. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 1–23. |
| 26. | Kremer, M. (1997). Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein. Philosophical Topics, 25 (2), 87–120. |
| 27. | Kremer, M. (2001). The Purpose of Tractarian Nonsense. Noûs, 35 (1), 39–73. |
| 28. | Kremer M. (2002). Mathematics and Meaning in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 25 (3), 272–303. |
| 29. | Livingston, P. (2004). “Meaning is Use” in the Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 27 (1), 34–67. |
| 30. | Pears, D. (1990). Wittgenstein’s Holism. Dialectica, 44 (1–2), 165–173. |
| 31. | McGuinness B. (2002). The Supposed Realism of The Tractatus. In: B. McGuinness, Approaches to Wittgenstein. Collected Papers (pp. 82–94). London: Routledge. |
| 32. | Pagin, P. (1997). Is Compositionality Compatible with Holism? Mind & Language, 12 (1), 11–33. |
| 33. | Ryle, G. (2009a). Systematically Misleading Expressions. In: G. Ryle, Collected Papers. Vol. 2 (pp. 41–65). London: Routledge. |
| 34. | Ryle, G. (2009b). Categories. In: G. Ryle , Collected Papers. Vol. 2 (pp. 178–193). London: Routledge. |
| 35. | Ryle, G. (2009c). Letters and Syllables in Plato. In: G. Ryle, Collected Papers. Vol. 1 (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge. |
| 36. | Ryle, G. (2009d). Phenomenology versus the Concept of Mind. In: G. Ryle, Collected Papers. Vol. 1 (pp. 186–204). London: Routledge. |
| 37. | Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14 (4), 479–493. |
| 38. | Russell, B. (1910–1911). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108–128. |
| 39. | Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| 40. | Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. C.K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. German/English Edition. |
| 41. | Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Eds. P.M.S. Hacker, J. Schulte. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, J. Schulte.Wiley-Blackwell. |
| 42. | Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks: 1914–1916. Eds. G.H. von Wright, G.E.M. Anscombe. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| 43. | Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Eds. G.E.M. Anscombe, R. Rhees. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, D. Paul. Oxford: Blackwell. |