1. | Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19. |
2. | Brandt, R. (1963). Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism. W H.-N. Castaneda & G. Nakhnikian (Red.), Morality and the Language of Conduct (s. 107–43). |
3. | Brandt, R. (1992a). Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics. W Morality, utilitarianism, and rights (s. 137–157). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. |
4. | Brandt, R. (1992b). Morality and its Critics. W Morality, utilitarianism, and rights (s. 73–92). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. |
5. | Cummiskey, D. (1996). Kantian Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press. |
6. | Darwall, S. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. |
7. | Dworkin, R., Nagel, T., Nozick, R., Rawls, J., & Thomson, J. J. (1997, marzec 27). Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief. The New York Review of Books. Pobrano z http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/ |
8. | Gauthier, D. P. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
9. | Goodin, R. E. (1995). Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. |
10. | Goodin, R. E. (Red.). (1998). The theory of institutional design. Cambridge University Press. |
11. | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847 |
12. | Greenberg, Y. K. (Red.). (2008). Encyclopedia of Love in World Religions (T. 2). Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford: ABC-CLIO. |
13. | Haidt, J. (2007). The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651 |
14. | Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books. |
15. | Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, Where Community, Authority, and Sacredness are Foundations of Morality. W Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Pobrano z http://www.myilibrary.com?id=205361 |
16. | Hampton, J. (1986). Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge University Press. |
17. | Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
18. | Hellman, D. (2008). When Is Discrimination Wrong? Harvard University Press. |
19. | Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal Code, Real World: a Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
20. | Hooker, B., & Fletcher, G. (2008). Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(231), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.518.x |
21. | Hosseini, S. R. (2013). Meaning in life: a Wittgensteinian approach. University of Johannesburg. Pobrano z https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za/handle/10210/8676 |
22. | Hurka, T. (1996). Perfectionism (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. |
23. | Kagan, S. (1989). The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
24. | Kagan, S. (2000). Evaluative focal points. W B. Hooker, E. Mason, & D. Miller (Red.), Morality, Rules, and Consequences: a Critical Reader (s. 134–155). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. |
25. | Kamm, F. (2007). Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. |
26. | Kavka, G. (1986). Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton University Press. |
27. | Korsgaard, C. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. |
28. | Lousie, J. (2004). Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54(217), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00370.x |
29. | MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. |
30. | Mulgan, T. (2005). The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press. |
31. | Murphy, L. B. (1998). Institutions and the Demands of Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(4), 251–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00071.x |
32. | Narveson, J. (1988). The Libertarian Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. |
33. | Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. University of California Press. |
34. | Parfit, D. (1997). Equality and Priority. Ratio, 10(3), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00041 |
35. | Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters (T. I). Oxford University Press. |
36. | Portmore, D. (2007). Consequentializing Moral Theories. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88(1), 39–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00280.x |
37. | Portmore, D. (2009). Consequentializing. Philosophy Compass, 4(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00198.x |
38. | Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap. |
39. | Ridge, M. (2006). Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism. The Philosophical Quarterly, (223), 242–253. |
40. | Ridge, M. (2009). Consequentialist Kantianism. Philosophical Perspectives, 23(1), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00178.x |
41. | Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. |
42. | Singer, P. (1977). Animal Liberation. New York: Avon Books. |
43. | Singer, P. (2009). The Life You Can Save. New York: Random House. |
44. | Williams, G. (2006). Infrastructures of Responsibility: the Moral Tasks of Institutions. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 23(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00330.x |