Analiza i Egzystencja

ISSN: 1734-9923     eISSN: 2300-7621    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/aie.2019.46-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Issue archive / 46 (2019)
Neutralność państwa wobec religii w świetle Charlesa Taylora koncepcji sekularyzacji (State’s Neutrality towards Religion in the Light of Charles Taylor’s Secularization Concept)
(State's neutrality towards religion in light of Charles Taylor's concept of secularism)

Authors: Antoni Torzewski
Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego
Keywords: secularism religion state neutrality Taylor
Data publikacji całości:2019
Page range:18 (57-74)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

In the contemporary philosophy secularism is broadly discussed. However, the problem is far more complex than it may seem at the first glance. For secularism is not only state’s separation from religion, but also a number of other postulates and presumptions which are often forgotten. Charles Taylor presents his theory of secularism in the book Secularism and Freedom of Conscience where he distinguishes two groups of postulates of secularism. In this article I will focus myself on five matters concerning the postulate of neutrality towards religion, which arises on the grounds of Taylor concept, but also transcend it. Reflections on the state’s neutrality towards religion also constitute a ground to ask about the sense of secularism and its real application in public life.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Barnat, D. (2013). Świeckość jako podłoże rozumienia. Diametros, 36, 1–26.
2.Barnat, D. (2017). Sekularyzm polityczny a spór o przekonania sumienia. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 4 (64), 293–323.
3.Dawkins, R. (2007). Bóg urojony. Tłum. P. Szwajcer. Warszawa: CiS.
4.Jasiński, K. (2016). Charlesa Taylora rozumienie sekularyzacji. Nurt SVD, 2, 396–415.
5.Kant, I. (1993). Religia w obrębie samego rozumu. Tłum. A. Bobko. Kraków: Znak.
6.Kotarbiński, T. (1987). Pisma etyczne. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
7.Laegaard, S. (2013). Secular Religious Establishment. A Framework for Discussing the Compatibility of Institutional Religious Establishment with Political Secularism. Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), 2 (3), 119–157.
8.Taylor, Ch. (1999). A Catholic Modernity. New York–Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.Taylor, Ch. (2002). Oblicza religii dzisiaj. Tłum. A. Lipszyc. Kraków: Znak.
10.Taylor, Ch. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham–London: Duke University Press.
11.Taylor, Ch. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
12.Taylor, Ch., Maclure, J. (2011). Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Cambridge (MA)–London: Harvard University Press.
13.Rorty, R. (1997). Religious Faith, Intellectual Responsibility and Romance. W: R.A. Putnam (red.), Cambridge Companion to William James (s. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
15.Rorty, R. (2011). An Ethics for Today. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.Rousseau, J.J. (2002). Umowa społeczna. Tłum. A. Peretiakowicz. Kęty: Antyk Marek Derewiecki.
17.Węcławski, T. (1995). Wspólny świat religii. Kraków: Znak.
18.Wittgenstein, L. (1995). Uwagi o religii i etyce. Tłum. W. Sady, M. Kawecka,W. Walentukiewicz. Kraków: Znak.
19.Vattimo, G., Rorty, R. (2005). The Future of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.Vattimo, G. (1999). Belief. Stanford: Stanford University Press.